As it relates to this conversation, Fitz was called a "below average #2" behind the likes of Woods, Jones, etc... So, would you rather have Woods over Fitz? Regardless of what's been called back by penalty, I think I would rather have Fitz any day.
It depends, if you mean one game I'll take Fitz. If you mean right now on my team I'd take Woods because he's 9 years younger and seems to have come into his own the last 3 seasons( 2 previous plus this one) with the Rams.
Don't get me wrong Fitz makes incredible catches and is off to a great start but he is also heavily targeted, ESPN says 24 times in 2 games, and has 13 catches. Woods has 15 targets 10 catches. Fitz has twice as many yards but again Woods has had 2 TD's and another long catch called back, or his stats would look very similar to Fitz, with more TD's, and far less targets.
Fitz is one of the best to ever play and I can't think of a Wr I'd prefer to throw to if I need one catch or even 1 game, but he's 36 years old, my guess is his numbers this year will start to come down in terms of YPC closer to where they've been in recent years.
Fitz has less competition on the roster which means more attention from the defense, but also more chances to make plays. Woods has to share the ball with other Wr's and has a run game which means less attention on him, but also less chances to make plays.