Enjoy an Ads-Free ASFN - lighter and faster too! Become an ASFN-Contributor and help support the site.
Go Back   Arizona Sports Fans Network > Arizona Teams > NAU and All Non-Arizona College Sports

Welcome to ASFN Fan Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.


Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old March 28th, 2003, 08:38 AM   #1
DWKB
AKA Dust Chinstrap
 
DWKB's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 2,877
A$FN: 2,151

1 AZ Team down, 1 To go


Gotta love the rematch. This one means so much more though.



Rock Chalk Jayhawk!!
Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!
DWKB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 28th, 2003, 11:48 AM   #2
schutd
Regular User
 
schutd's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Harlem, NYC
Posts: 4,012
A$FN: 2,200
Shades of 97, eh? Cept this time The Cats are the number 1 seed. Either way, its going to be a stellar matchup.

I never predict victories, but after last nights performance against ND, The Cats looked freaking hungry. And the Hawks had to work hard in their matchup. I like that.

But this is the tourney. And anything can happen. And you KNOW thats true when even ASU wins a game.
schutd is online now   Reply With Quote
Old March 28th, 2003, 12:49 PM   #3
DWKB
AKA Dust Chinstrap
 
DWKB's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 2,877
A$FN: 2,151
Quote:
Originally posted by schutd
Shades of 97, eh? Cept this time The Cats are the number 1 seed. Either way, its going to be a stellar matchup.

I never predict victories, but after last nights performance against ND, The Cats looked freaking hungry. And the Hawks had to work hard in their matchup. I like that.

But this is the tourney. And anything can happen. And you KNOW thats true when even ASU wins a game.

Well I'll say this much, it's pretty obvious that the Zags were a much better team than ASU was so it makes sense that UofA struggled more to get the the Sweet 16 than KU. But on the flip side, I think its safe to say that Duke was a much better team than ND.
DWKB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 29th, 2003, 07:40 AM   #4
schutd
Regular User
 
schutd's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Harlem, NYC
Posts: 4,012
A$FN: 2,200
Absolutely. I was just pointing out that the Cats got some rest on Thursday night, and the Jayhawks had to fight til the end. One would hope that would help us, even if only a little.

Should be another GREAT game today...
schutd is online now   Reply With Quote
Old March 29th, 2003, 06:29 PM   #5
DWKB
AKA Dust Chinstrap
 
DWKB's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 2,877
A$FN: 2,151
Raaaawwwwk....Chaaaaawwwwk...JaaaayyyyyyyyHaaaawww wk.....Kaaaayyyyyy....Uuuuuuuuuu.....


AZ got us first, but we got them best!!!!


In all seriousness though, that was a great game!!!
DWKB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 29th, 2003, 06:33 PM   #6
Chaplin
Shaqtus
 
Chaplin's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 15,618
A$FN: 2,050
Great or not, we didn't deserve to win that game. Hinrich just was unconscious. I hate to blame Lute, and even though that 1-3-1 defense took Collison totally out of the game, I would have liked to see a 2-3 to try to contain Hinrich.
__________________
----------------------------------------------------
"I don't flop. I don't complain. I beat you." - Shaquille O'Neal
Chaplin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 29th, 2003, 07:53 PM   #7
green machine
I rule at posting
 
green machine's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Back in the Valley
Posts: 5,510
A$FN: 1,412
Blog Entries: 2
Send a message via AIM to green machine
Tough game, Kansas played very well. They deserved to win. Congrats to them. The Cats' future is bright, however, our freshmen are awesome.

adam
__________________

adamgreenjournalism.blogspot.com
green machine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 30th, 2003, 11:38 AM   #8
schutd
Regular User
 
schutd's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Harlem, NYC
Posts: 4,012
A$FN: 2,200
Yeah, I won't way that we didn't deserve to win that game. I think both teams deserved to win it. Its one of those matchups where you prefer to see the clock shut off and just have them keep going until no one is left standing. What a dog fight.

Bottom line, If the Cats protect the ball, they win that game. Kudos to the Jayhawks for earning those turnovers, too. For as many as Frye let slip through his fingers, Kansas flat out stole as many.

Igoudala and Adams are going to be huge. Frye needs more bulk. He's snother Loren Woods. And I don't know what happened to him last night, be just looked like he wasnt ready for that big a stage.

To Anderson, you played your heart out for us, and I hope you have success in whatever your next endeavors are.

To Gardner and Walton, no words can describe your importance to the program. May your careers continue and may you both flourish.

Thanks for a great season, Cats.
schutd is online now   Reply With Quote
Old March 30th, 2003, 12:47 PM   #9
Chaplin
Shaqtus
 
Chaplin's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 15,618
A$FN: 2,050
Granted, the turnovers hurt us, but I think the thing that hurt us the most is easily the perimeter defense. Like I said, the 1-3-1 helped inside, but outside it was worthless. That's how we got beat.
__________________
----------------------------------------------------
"I don't flop. I don't complain. I beat you." - Shaquille O'Neal
Chaplin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 31st, 2003, 06:09 AM   #10
schutd
Regular User
 
schutd's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Harlem, NYC
Posts: 4,012
A$FN: 2,200
Valid, but if you shut down COllison, you're going to have to give someone an open look. Hinrich rebounded well from a horrid performance in his previous game, and the rest of the KS team doesnt have the perimeter shooters, so I thought the stratgey was exactly what we needed. We certainly shot well enough on our end to stya within three, even with Hinrich going off.

Take away the points off turnovers, which at one point was 16-0 and THERE'S where the cats lost. I thought we had a pick your poison defense, and Hinrich was able to hit the shots. Good for him. But again, I dont think thats what did us in at all.
schutd is online now   Reply With Quote
Old March 31st, 2003, 07:33 AM   #11
DWKB
AKA Dust Chinstrap
 
DWKB's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 2,877
A$FN: 2,151
You put up a 2-3 zone and you might take away Hinrich but you definately open up the drive from Langford then. Plus maybe a little more room for Collison. I agree with schutd, I don't think the D was what beat you. It was the points off turnovers.
DWKB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 31st, 2003, 08:43 AM   #12
SirChaz
Watch out for #1
 
SirChaz's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Wandering the Universe
Posts: 8,783
A$FN: 1,050
Send a message via AIM to SirChaz Send a message via Yahoo to SirChaz
Congrats to Kansas

It was a well played game. I enjoyed it except the final score.

To many turnovers by the Cats, not enough Frye in the post.
Kansas did a great job.

GO CATS '03-'04
SirChaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 31st, 2003, 08:53 AM   #13
Chaplin
Shaqtus
 
Chaplin's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 15,618
A$FN: 2,050
Quote:
Originally posted by DWKB
You put up a 2-3 zone and you might take away Hinrich but you definately open up the drive from Langford then. Plus maybe a little more room for Collison. I agree with schutd, I don't think the D was what beat you. It was the points off turnovers.
It didn't matter, Langford was driving and pulling up for the little 10 footer several times with the 1-3-1. Mostly because we were too intent on Collison.
__________________
----------------------------------------------------
"I don't flop. I don't complain. I beat you." - Shaquille O'Neal
Chaplin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Sitemap:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:29 PM.



Subscribe in a reader
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007 - 2008, PixelFX Studios
Copyright © 2002 - 2006 ArizonaSportsFans.com
Inactive Reminders By Icora Web Design