June 23rd, 2009, 10:06 AM
|
#1
|
|
Jump Program
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 152
|
Spurs get RJ for Oberto/KurtThomas/Bowen
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=4281291
So they start Parker, Ginobili, Jefferson, Duncan, and whoever at center. Scary lineup.
|
|
|
June 23rd, 2009, 10:10 AM
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 40
|
Yeah, but bowen not being there is good for Nash 
|
|
|
June 23rd, 2009, 10:13 AM
|
#3
|
|
Custom User Title!
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 5,168
|
Great trade for SAS.
Kurt Thomas is tied to so many lopsided trades that teams are trying to obtain him in hopes that he can land them a lucrative deal later on!
__________________
|
|
|
June 23rd, 2009, 10:13 AM
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,460
|
eeehhh... so they trade 3 of their best defenders for a average scorer... not sure this makes them that much better if not worse.
|
|
|
June 23rd, 2009, 10:14 AM
|
#5
|
|
Jump Program
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 152
|
If the Bucks immediately cut Oberto and Bowen to keep them off the salary cap, they could both resign with the Spurs. So the trade could end up as RJ for KT.
|
|
|
June 23rd, 2009, 10:14 AM
|
#6
|
|
...
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 44,426
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nashman
eeehhh... so they trade 3 of their best defenders for a average scorer... not sure this makes them that much better if not worse.
|
Agree. Meh.
__________________
|
|
|
June 23rd, 2009, 10:37 AM
|
#7
|
|
Suns need to get defensive
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: In a van...down by the river.
Posts: 8,074
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nashman
eeehhh... so they trade 3 of their best defenders for a average scorer... not sure this makes them that much better if not worse.
|
An average scorer? If you remove Jefferson's rookie year where he only started in 9 games he's a career 19+ ppg, 3 apg, 5 rpg guy.
Solid.
__________________
Fishing in the Lou
|
|
|
June 23rd, 2009, 10:43 AM
|
#8
|
|
I'm better than Mulli!
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: SoCal
Posts: 10,846
|
we never end up on the "we sent you expiring garbage for a good player" end of these deals. and that sucks.
good deal for spurs. bowen was done. kurt is somewhat useful. oberto is immimently replaceable for the spurs. and now they've got another potent score, got a bit younger, and more athletic.
and we're going to play the bucks' role in whatever deal we swing. awesome. make it happen. then we'll get to watch as we draft robin lopez part deux. FLEXIBLITY!!!
__________________
I no longer have any idea whether Mojorizen CARES!
"Standing mens bathroom troughs sucked rear nevermind the smell." - OmeneX (This just had to be quoted)
|
|
|
June 23rd, 2009, 10:55 AM
|
#9
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 5,864
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ouchie-Z-Clown
we never end up on the "we sent you expiring garbage for a good player" end of these deals. and that sucks.
good deal for spurs. bowen was done. kurt is somewhat useful. oberto is immimently replaceable for the spurs. and now they've got another potent score, got a bit younger, and more athletic.
and we're going to play the bucks' role in whatever deal we swing. awesome. make it happen. then we'll get to watch as we draft robin lopez part deux. FLEXIBLITY!!!
|
That's because we are always in luxury tax hell.
|
|
|
June 23rd, 2009, 11:01 AM
|
#10
|
|
Custom User Title!
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 5,168
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nashman
eeehhh... so they trade 3 of their best defenders for a average scorer... not sure this makes them that much better if not worse.
|
Do you watch basketball?
Bowen degraded faster than Raja did in the last year
Oberto's job was to take fouls so Duncan didnt have to
KT is worth moving to get a legit starting SF, RJ is a great scorer and plays both ends of the floor.
__________________
|
|
|
June 23rd, 2009, 11:11 AM
|
#11
|
|
The Bowles Movement
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
Posts: 12,653
|
San Antonio wins with this one. Two players with high mileage and one who is a role player at best for a multi-faceted player who can put up points and will thrive with a PG like Parker and take pressure off Duncan. For those who thought they would be irrelevant next season, think again.
By the way, how stupid is Milwaukee for making this deal?
__________________
|
|
|
June 23rd, 2009, 11:18 AM
|
#12
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: PHX
Posts: 137
|
hot diggity. how does this always seem to happen to other teams besides us. spurs win again, and is the rebuilding mode in milwaukee ever going to be complete? does michael redd want out now?
|
|
|
June 23rd, 2009, 11:20 AM
|
#13
|
|
Suns need to get defensive
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: In a van...down by the river.
Posts: 8,074
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TJ UofA2004
San Antonio wins with this one. Two players with high mileage and one who is a role player at best for a multi-faceted player who can put up points and will thrive with a PG like Parker and take pressure off Duncan. For those who thought they would be irrelevant next season, think again.
By the way, how stupid is Milwaukee for making this deal?
|
They're a bad team....what do you expect?
Memphis bent over for the LakeShow to give Gasol away. Why? They're a bad team.
These bad teams are constantly trying to dump salary so they can constantly suck so they can consistently get into the lottery and sign their high draft picks so they can dump them later on for more flexability to suck.
__________________
Fishing in the Lou
|
|
|
June 23rd, 2009, 11:23 AM
|
#14
|
|
flamboyantly righteous!
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 3,538
|
Thomas and Oberto were in there to bang with the big guys, Duncan can't...how does this help?
__________________
|
|
|
June 23rd, 2009, 12:53 PM
|
#15
|
|
Suns -> But were entertaining!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Arizona
Posts: 10,265
|
Thomas and Oberto are nothing special and replaceable IMO. This is a fantastic move for two not so great players and an aging Bruce Bowen. What is not to like about this trade.
Some of you want to stand pat with the team we have? Really?
|
|
|
|
|