February 11th, 2008, 09:27 AM
|
#1
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 401
|
Splitting vocals from background music?
Does anyone know how to split the vocals from the background music using a mac? I know that there is software that allows you to essentially delete the vocals and you are then left with karaoke like songs. However, I would like to preserve the actually vocals too. Any help would be awesome!
__________________
|
|
|
February 11th, 2008, 10:57 AM
|
#2
|
|
Plucky Comic Relief
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Gilbert
Posts: 15,210
|
Ummmm. Well, if you had the original track and track software, you could just turn off the vocals. If there's a way to eliminate the vocals from a stereo track without removing significant portions of the instrumentation, that would have to be considered magic. I would be very impressed.
__________________
Before I saw him, I could figure things out. He was the first guy I saw close-up and just didn't get what he was doing. Josh Freese on Vinnie Colaiuta
|
|
|
February 11th, 2008, 11:50 AM
|
#3
|
|
Waxing Gibbous
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Moment, AZ
Posts: 823
|
Well, there is something, not very elegant, that may work. I did it once in a digital audio workstation class with decent results. Basically it works with your average pop songs without a bunch of reverb or backup vocals. Because most pop songs pan vocals to the center of a stereo mix, you can use a technique called "vocal removal". Most audio editing programs have the ability to do this, but don't expect high quality results. Basically you would be removing what is common to both tracks (i.e. the vocals), leaving behind what is different (i.e. the instrumentals).
Basically you split the stereo track into its left and right channels, make both mono, invert all (or a selected part) of one of them, and play back the result. Sometimes it works well, most of the time it doesn't because lots of other things could be panned to the center, and they will go bye-bye as well.
I found this plug-in that might work with some Mac programs.
|
|
|
February 11th, 2008, 01:06 PM
|
#4
|
|
Waxing Gibbous
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Moment, AZ
Posts: 823
|
I apologize for poor reading comprehension, read post waaaaay too quickly. (but spent plenty of time on reply) 
|
|
|
February 11th, 2008, 01:18 PM
|
#5
|
|
badass
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: SE valley
Posts: 11,937
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheKid_1
Does anyone know how to split the vocals from the background music using a mac? I know that there is software that allows you to essentially delete the vocals and you are then left with karaoke like songs. However, I would like to preserve the actually vocals too. Any help would be awesome!
|
I could pretend to provide4 accurate information for the phone numbers of the gals in your signature :wink:
__________________
Quote:
|
Those who fail to plan, plan to fail.
|
#BIRDGANG
Draft a top Guard - check!
|
|
|
February 11th, 2008, 02:34 PM
|
#6
|
|
Plucky Comic Relief
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Gilbert
Posts: 15,210
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by puckhead
Well, there is something, not very elegant, that may work. I did it once in a digital audio workstation class with decent results. Basically it works with your average pop songs without a bunch of reverb or backup vocals. Because most pop songs pan vocals to the center of a stereo mix, you can use a technique called "vocal removal". Most audio editing programs have the ability to do this, but don't expect high quality results. Basically you would be removing what is common to both tracks (i.e. the vocals), leaving behind what is different (i.e. the instrumentals).
Basically you split the stereo track into its left and right channels, make both mono, invert all (or a selected part) of one of them, and play back the result. Sometimes it works well, most of the time it doesn't because lots of other things could be panned to the center, and they will go bye-bye as well.
I found this plug-in that might work with some Mac programs.
|
Now that I think about it, this could really work well for audio optimized for 5.1. Vocals usually in mono, center.
__________________
Before I saw him, I could figure things out. He was the first guy I saw close-up and just didn't get what he was doing. Josh Freese on Vinnie Colaiuta
|
|
|
February 11th, 2008, 04:05 PM
|
#7
|
|
Like a boss
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tempe
Posts: 15,074
|
I don't know about splitting vocals but I'd like to do some splitting with your sig.
__________________
RIP King of Cards
Tim Minnick 9/12/1972-3/4/2007
You'll be missed.
|
|
|
February 11th, 2008, 06:09 PM
|
#8
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Brooklyn, 11222
Posts: 4,866
|
Either assface is a lesbo, or that question about which poster is not a girl back in the trivia thread is now a dead giveaway!
|
|
|
February 12th, 2008, 03:55 AM
|
#9
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 7,159
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by puckhead
Well, there is something, not very elegant, that may work. I did it once in a digital audio workstation class with decent results. Basically it works with your average pop songs without a bunch of reverb or backup vocals. Because most pop songs pan vocals to the center of a stereo mix, you can use a technique called "vocal removal". Most audio editing programs have the ability to do this, but don't expect high quality results. Basically you would be removing what is common to both tracks (i.e. the vocals), leaving behind what is different (i.e. the instrumentals).
Basically you split the stereo track into its left and right channels, make both mono, invert all (or a selected part) of one of them, and play back the result. Sometimes it works well, most of the time it doesn't because lots of other things could be panned to the center, and they will go bye-bye as well.
I found this plug-in that might work with some Mac programs.
|
I concur 100% with this. Adobe Audition has a great Channel Mixer plugin that allows you to do exactly that above. I'm not sure of any cheaper programs that do that though.
Oh, and I totally agree with Assface. Those chicks are smoking hot.
|
|
|
|
|