Enjoy an Ads-Free ASFN - lighter and faster too! Become an ASFN-Contributor and help support the site.
Go Back   Arizona Sports Fans Network > Arizona Teams > Phoenix Suns > NBA Trade forum

Welcome to ASFN Fan Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.


Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old June 25th, 2007, 01:39 AM   #1
azirish
Registered User
 
azirish's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sun City
Posts: 3,876
A$FN: 1,000

Stoudemire and the Base Year Contract Issue


Slin pointed out that Amare's base year contract does not expire until July 1 - after the draft. If you try to run a deal sending Amare in exchange for KG; Real GM trade checker shoots it down (even when throwing in more players like KT and Banks).

This doesn't mean a deal might not be done later, but it seems very unlikely that it could be made to work without draft picks. After the the draft those picks have to be costed into the cap exchange as if they were under contract.
Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!
azirish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 25th, 2007, 01:51 AM   #2
thegrahamcrackr
Registered User
 

Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Scottsdale, Az
Posts: 6,159
A$FN: 1,000
Quote:
Originally Posted by azirish View Post
This doesn't mean a deal might not be done later, but it seems very unlikely that it could be made to work without draft picks. After the the draft those picks have to be costed into the cap exchange as if they were under contract.

Incorrect (well sort of). After the draft those picks still have no salary value until the player has actually signed his rookie deal. Until then, they are simply the rights to a player.

However, first round draft picks cannot be traded until December 15th or 30 days after they sign (whichever is later).

The BYC issue actually isn't an issue at all. They simply agree to a deal verbally, and publicize it so no one can back out. Then they actually consumate it whenever the timing works. Remember how long it took for the Kidd/Marbury trade to actually happen after it was announced?
__________________
Chad is a very special person with a very special job!
thegrahamcrackr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 25th, 2007, 03:13 AM   #3
Gaddabout
Plucky comic relief
 
Gaddabout's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Mesa
Posts: 6,368
A$FN: 5,536
Blog Entries: 5
Quote:
Originally Posted by thegrahamcrackr View Post
Incorrect (well sort of). After the draft those picks still have no salary value until the player has actually signed his rookie deal. Until then, they are simply the rights to a player.

However, first round draft picks cannot be traded until December 15th or 30 days after they sign (whichever is later).

The BYC issue actually isn't an issue at all. They simply agree to a deal verbally, and publicize it so no one can back out. Then they actually consumate it whenever the timing works. Remember how long it took for the Kidd/Marbury trade to actually happen after it was announced?
Thanks for explaining this. It's been a sore point and I hadn't heard anyone explain it to my satisfaction until now. Needless to say, Minny is dead set against trading KG AND trading down in the draft, so an exchange of picks in that scenario is out of the question, anyway.
__________________
Local commentary, sugar-free!
the desert gadabout
Gaddabout is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 25th, 2007, 12:00 PM   #4
azirish
Registered User
 
azirish's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sun City
Posts: 3,876
A$FN: 1,000
Quote:
Originally Posted by thegrahamcrackr View Post
They simply agree to a deal verbally, and publicize it so no one can back out.
Are you sure about that?

The Q for KT deal was publicized widely and then IT changed the conditions of the deal and really jobbed the Suns. "Oral contracts are not worth the paper they're written on." Publicizing the deal does not change that.
azirish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 25th, 2007, 12:36 PM   #5
sunsfn
Registered User
 

Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,507
A$FN: 1,000
Quote:
Originally Posted by azirish View Post
Are you sure about that?

The Q for KT deal was publicized widely and then IT changed the conditions of the deal and really jobbed the Suns. "Oral contracts are not worth the paper they're written on." Publicizing the deal does not change that.
What I remember about the Q deal is that because of the physical and the bad back on Q the Knicks wanted the pick that year and insisted on it or no deal. The suns said ok and went ahead and gave them the pick. That is the changed part, it had nothing to do with the deal overall.
__________________
I don't make jokes. I just watch the government and report the facts. -Will Rogers
sunsfn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 25th, 2007, 01:18 PM   #6
azirish
Registered User
 
azirish's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sun City
Posts: 3,876
A$FN: 1,000
Quote:
Originally Posted by sunsfn View Post
What I remember about the Q deal is that because of the physical and the bad back on Q the Knicks wanted the pick that year and insisted on it or no deal. The suns said ok and went ahead and gave them the pick. That is the changed part, it had nothing to do with the deal overall.
Switching years made a huge difference. The guys the Suns were precluded from drafting in the first round included:

Jack
Carcia
Head
Petro
Maxiell
Lee
azirish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 25th, 2007, 01:44 PM   #7
sunsfn
Registered User
 

Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,507
A$FN: 1,000
Quote:
Originally Posted by azirish View Post
Switching years made a huge difference. The guys the Suns were precluded from drafting in the first round included:

Jack
Carcia
Head
Petro
Maxiell
Lee
Yes, but I thought you were saying the deal was a verbal deal and that is why it changed. I am saying it changed because of a bad physical.
__________________
I don't make jokes. I just watch the government and report the facts. -Will Rogers
sunsfn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 25th, 2007, 06:05 PM   #8
azirish
Registered User
 
azirish's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sun City
Posts: 3,876
A$FN: 1,000
Quote:
Originally Posted by sunsfn View Post
Yes, but I thought you were saying the deal was a verbal deal and that is why it changed. I am saying it changed because of a bad physical.
That was what IT said, but it didn't matter. There was no finished contract and he could easily jerk the Suns, which he did.
azirish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 25th, 2007, 07:27 PM   #9
sunsfn
Registered User
 

Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,507
A$FN: 1,000
Quote:
Originally Posted by azirish View Post
That was what IT said, but it didn't matter. There was no finished contract and he could easily jerk the Suns, which he did.
George,
In a written deal, if there is a problem with a physical, all bets are off!

So, yes this deal did not work out for the suns, but it would have had to be changed wether it was verbal or written, because of Q not passing his physical, and the Knicks not being able to get ins.
__________________
I don't make jokes. I just watch the government and report the facts. -Will Rogers
sunsfn is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Sitemap:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:02 PM.



Subscribe in a reader
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007 - 2008, PixelFX Studios
Copyright © 2002 - 2006 ArizonaSportsFans.com
Inactive Reminders By Icora Web Design