Enjoy an Ads-Free ASFN - lighter and faster too! Become an ASFN-Contributor and help support the site.
Go Back   Arizona Sports Fans Network > Arizona Teams > Arizona Cardinals

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old September 20th, 2009, 05:17 PM   #31
Shane
I'm Coming for YOU!
 
Shane's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2002
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 45,145
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pariah View Post
I honestly don't know what this sentence means.

maybe they're not panicking as much? Is it possible to have gray area around here, or does everything have to swing 100% one way or another?
You said it was more like "we'll miss him" I stated in my response that you were in the "miss" him category. While others are/were in panic mode.

Maybe they shouldn't have panicked to begin with is more my line of thinking. But since they did I asked the question as to whether or not they are past the Haley love now that Whiz called a superb game. Perfectly logical question to see if they swing as hard the other way from week to week.
Enjoy an Ads-Free ASFN - lighter and faster too! Become an ASFN-Contributor and help support the site.
Shane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 20th, 2009, 05:18 PM   #32
Shane
I'm Coming for YOU!
 
Shane's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2002
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 45,145
Quote:
Originally Posted by Donald View Post
As I said before, as a playcaller, Whis has a Super Bowl ring. As a head coach, he had his team leading the Super Bowl with 2 minutes left. As a HC/OC combo package, he isn't proven.

Can he do it? I have no doubts that man can do it. SHOULD he do it? I don't think so.
Your so dumb!
Shane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 20th, 2009, 05:20 PM   #33
Pariah
H.S.
 
Pariah's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Aventine
Posts: 35,345
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shane H View Post
Perfectly logical question to see if they swing as hard the other way from week to week.
And I still think it's perfectly logical to say the jury's still out. One great game, one crappy game. who knows who the real 2009 cardinals are. I think we're probably somewhere in the middle.

...but it sure was great to see the short, quick passing game back.
Pariah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 20th, 2009, 05:21 PM   #34
ajcardfan
I see you.
 
ajcardfan's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 19,124
I see Russel only completed 7 passes for 104 yards and McFadden was the leading rusher with 35 for the Raiders. And, the Chiefs STILL lost 13-10? Wow.
__________________
We live in a world which is full of misery and ignorance, and the plain duty of each and all of us is to try to make the little corner he can influence somewhat less miserable and somewhat less ignorant than it was before he entered it.

T.H. Huxley
ajcardfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 20th, 2009, 05:25 PM   #35
Shane
I'm Coming for YOU!
 
Shane's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2002
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 45,145
Quote:
Originally Posted by ajcardfan View Post
I see Russel only completed 7 passes for 104 yards and McFadden was the leading rusher with 35 for the Raiders. And, the Chiefs STILL lost 13-10? Wow.
That's amazing.
Shane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 20th, 2009, 05:25 PM   #36
Shane
I'm Coming for YOU!
 
Shane's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2002
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 45,145
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pariah View Post
And I still think it's perfectly logical to say the jury's still out. One great game, one crappy game. who knows who the real 2009 cardinals are. I think we're probably somewhere in the middle.

...but it sure was great to see the short, quick passing game back.
I agree with you.
Shane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 20th, 2009, 06:29 PM   #37
D-Dogg
A Whole New World
 
D-Dogg's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On another planet
Posts: 40,794
Send a message via MSN to D-Dogg
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shane H View Post
Your so dumb!
Your so dead.
__________________
You see, Cards fans, when you love a team without likin' it, the games can be long and cold, and contempt comes up with the sun...
D-Dogg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 20th, 2009, 06:32 PM   #38
Shane
I'm Coming for YOU!
 
Shane's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2002
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 45,145
Quote:
Originally Posted by Donald View Post
Your so dead.


You love me!
Shane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 20th, 2009, 07:13 PM   #39
Catfish
Registered
 
Catfish's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,122
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shane H View Post
The way Warner has played against a VERY VERY good Jacksonville D that Held the Colts to 14 point on the road last week.

Can we now dismiss all the "losing Haley is gonna kill us" talk?

Is Whiz now capable of doing both jobs?

I know its only one game? But all of you were panicking about the O and Haley being gone after one game. So is your mind anymore at ease now?
Shane, I made a lot of posts during pre-season and last week
about having an OC. I NEVER said anything about Whiz not being capable of calling plays.----just that it took away from his ability to see the entire game when he had to resort to the play-book so much to find something that would work. I believe we would still be better off with a real OC to free Whiz to do HC functions. This was one game that worked, last week it didn't, and he called as good a game as he could. Just maybe he would have found something that worked better if he didn't have to do HC duties as well.

I would still prefer having an OC AND the HC being two separate people. I never said anything about Haley being better than Whiz at play calling. I happen to think that Whiz calls a more balanced game than Haley didwjen he was with us. (By the way, Haley is calling his own plays now at KC and is doing HC duties, just like Whiz). They are 0-2.
Catfish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 20th, 2009, 07:34 PM   #40
CardLogic
.
 
CardLogic's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 11,531
Quote:
Originally Posted by red desert View Post
No.

Today's win was due in large part, IMO, because Wiz allowed the offense revert back to allowing Warner to take charge, just as Haley did last season. in other words, as long as Wiz allows that, then we're okay. But if wiz wants to change the mindset of the playcalling,then we will miss Haley, and fail.
I don't understand this thinking, really. The offense goes through Whisenhunt and it went through Whiz last year also. Yes, Haley was the OC but Whiz was/is the architect.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Catfish View Post
I would still prefer having an OC AND the HC being two separate people.
And I agree with this thought.
__________________

"...fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell

"Get your facts first, and then you can distort them as much as you please."

-Samuel Langhorne Clemens (Mark Twain)
CardLogic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 20th, 2009, 09:02 PM   #41
overseascardfan
Registered User
 
overseascardfan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Scottsdale
Posts: 2,857
I believe the reason we won today was due to the OL getting its act together and winning the turnover battle, two things that cost us a defeat last week.
__________________
That's right man, no one messes with the Jesus
overseascardfan is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Tags
warner



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Sitemap:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:34 AM.



Subscribe in a reader
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007 - 2008, PixelFX Studios
Inactive Reminders By Icora Web Design