Enjoy an Ads-Free ASFN - lighter and faster too! Become an ASFN-Contributor and help support the site.
Go Back   Arizona Sports Fans Network > Arizona Teams > Arizona Cardinals

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old April 30th, 2012, 04:58 PM   #1
Shane
I'm Coming for YOU!
 
Shane's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2002
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 45,136

Good Whis video from NFL network today


nfl.com/2012/04/30/cardinals-whisenhunt-fitzgerald-not-involved-in-floyd-decision/?module=HP11_headline_stack" target="_blank">http://blogs.<a href="http://www.ari...headline_stack

Should lay to rest the "Fitzgerald is the GM" comments. Even though it won't.

Good stuff on Fitz, Floyd and QB's
Enjoy an Ads-Free ASFN - lighter and faster too! Become an ASFN-Contributor and help support the site.

Last edited by Shane; April 30th, 2012 at 05:02 PM.
Shane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 30th, 2012, 05:12 PM   #2
Vermont Maverick
Registered
 
Vermont Maverick's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Williston, Vermont
Posts: 1,168
Interesting that Whiz said exactly where he was on the board. #7 overall, and the second receiver. Sounds pretty truthful, no reason not to believe that. I'm guessing that means it was Luck, RGIII, Kalil, Claiborne, Blackmon, and Richardson - not necessarily in that order.
Vermont Maverick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 30th, 2012, 05:17 PM   #3
Shane
I'm Coming for YOU!
 
Shane's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2002
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 45,136
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vermont Maverick View Post
Interesting that Whiz said exactly where he was on the board. #7 overall, and the second receiver. Sounds pretty truthful, no reason not to believe that. I'm guessing that means it was Luck, RGIII, Kalil, Claiborne, Blackmon, and Richardson - not necessarily in that order.
Yup I found it interesting too. They had Blackmon rated higher.
Shane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 30th, 2012, 05:27 PM   #4
juza76
Registered
 

Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: milan
Posts: 1,356
for me their board was:
1-luck
2-griffinIII
3-kalil
4-barron
5-clairbone
6-kuechly
juza76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 30th, 2012, 05:33 PM   #5
Shane
I'm Coming for YOU!
 
Shane's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2002
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 45,136
Quote:
Originally Posted by juza76 View Post
for me their board was:
1-luck
2-griffinIII
3-kalil
4-barron
5-clairbone
6-kuechly
You would be wrong. Whiz stated in video they had Floyd rated #7 being there 2nd rated WR.
Shane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 30th, 2012, 05:38 PM   #6
Stout
Hey fudge packers..go for 2 ;)
 
Stout's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: New Castle, PA--Enemy territory!
Posts: 18,853
Great interview. Yeah, even though I didn't want the Floyd pick, it'd be pretty silly to say that Fitz is our GM now.

I do appreciate that even CKW admits that this will be Skelton's first offseason for OTAs and the like. Our coach knows that Skelton hasn't been given the practice and developmental time yet, so hopefully the board at large can all realize it too.
__________________
Lead us to the promised land, Arians.
Stout is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 30th, 2012, 05:43 PM   #7
red desert
Registered
 
red desert's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: A.B.Q. in da house
Posts: 6,194
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shane View Post
http://blogs.nfl.com/2012/04/30/card...headline_stack

Should lay to rest the "Fitzgerald is the GM" comments. Even though it won't.

Good stuff on Fitz, Floyd and QB's
Really? I thought it was the usual Wiz fluff piece. Honestly, his sound bites area a bore. No real info to sink my teeth into.
red desert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 30th, 2012, 06:09 PM   #8
JeffGollin
Registered User
 
JeffGollin's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2002
Location: Holmdel, NJ
Posts: 15,806
Quote:
Originally Posted by red desert View Post
Really? I thought it was the usual Wiz fluff piece. Honestly, his sound bites area a bore. No real info to sink my teeth into.
I think the reason for the fluff was that the interviewer didn't feed him interesting questions.

To me, the story lede sould have been: "Cards get their receiver but use later picks to help the offensive line.

Zero mention was made by the NFLN folk of Massie, Kelemete or Potter (which I felt was the big story of the Cardinal draft).
__________________
ONE HEARTBEAT.
Later (GBR/RIP40 - RIPSKKORP)
JeffGollin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 30th, 2012, 06:35 PM   #9
BEERZ
Oh no, we suck again!
 
BEERZ's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: ASFN
Posts: 8,103
Did some people actually believe this team just does what ever Fitz wants? Fitz is great, but a franchise QB he is not.
__________________
.
.
.
.


Quit inserting logic into my fantasy.-jf-08
BEERZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 30th, 2012, 07:44 PM   #10
Monty
2010 Cardinals Draft Guru
 
Monty's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,209
SIAP.

I dont know if anyone else read this article but azcardinals.com last week ran this piece on how player grades are presented on the Cardinals draft cards. As an example Steve Keim showed the draft card for Patrick Peterson and explained what each element of the card represented.



Link for full size of the card: http://prod.static.cardinals.clubs.n...-CARD-MOCK.jpg

The card itself is pretty self explanatory, but the piece itself is a pretty good exploration of how the Cardinals set up their draft board/war room and the level of work that goes into grading players.

Link for article: http://www.azcardinals.com/news-and-...1-b13eafd313ad

Last edited by Monty; April 30th, 2012 at 07:52 PM.
Monty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 30th, 2012, 08:25 PM   #11
A fan who cares
Registered
 

Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 493
I thought the video was insightful. It's good to have the national sports media like your pick, because you get positive coverage. Not that I need positive coverage to be happy, it's just nice to get Cardinal news from the Networks.
A fan who cares is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 30th, 2012, 08:29 PM   #12
Darkside
Registered
 

Join Date: May 2010
Location: Surprise, AZ
Posts: 2,811
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monty View Post
SIAP.

I dont know if anyone else read this article but azcardinals.com last week ran this piece on how player grades are presented on the Cardinals draft cards. As an example Steve Keim showed the draft card for Patrick Peterson and explained what each element of the card represented.



Link for full size of the card: http://prod.static.cardinals.clubs.n...-CARD-MOCK.jpg

The card itself is pretty self explanatory, but the piece itself is a pretty good exploration of how the Cardinals set up their draft board/war room and the level of work that goes into grading players.

Link for article: http://www.azcardinals.com/news-and-...1-b13eafd313ad
Loved the article, thanks for sharing. Kiem cracked me up when he talked about some players cards:

Besides the height/weight/speed are colored dots. One red dot is a medical risk. Two red dots mean the Cards will stay away because of medical concerns. Three mean a failed physical. A green dot means a positive test for a banned substance at the Combine. Blue means a verified arrest. Yellow is a character concern. “Sometimes a guy looks like a Christmas tree,” Keim said.

Last edited by Darkside; April 30th, 2012 at 08:31 PM.
Darkside is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 30th, 2012, 09:08 PM   #13
Monty
2010 Cardinals Draft Guru
 
Monty's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darkside View Post
Loved the article, thanks for sharing. Kiem cracked me up when he talked about some players cards:

Besides the height/weight/speed are colored dots. One red dot is a medical risk. Two red dots mean the Cards will stay away because of medical concerns. Three mean a failed physical. A green dot means a positive test for a banned substance at the Combine. Blue means a verified arrest. Yellow is a character concern. “Sometimes a guy looks like a Christmas tree,” Keim said.


I think it's an article that gives all us draftniks a little insight into the preparation for and operation of the draft war room. For example I found this quote regarding the construction of the 120 board quite interesting.

Quote:
The “120” board, built to take the guesswork out of the actual draft day, sorts out the parts that can’t easily be listed as a number or letter on such a small card. It’s not as simple as putting the players in descending grade order. Instead, the grade is just the biggest factor in an equation that includes football character, the Cards’ scheme and yes, roster need.
This seems to indicate that there is a separate process for grading a player and a separate process rating that player against his peers (ranking on the 120 board) each of which uses different factors.

Last edited by Monty; April 30th, 2012 at 09:14 PM.
Monty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 30th, 2012, 09:09 PM   #14
A fan who cares
Registered
 

Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 493
I think Graves & co are getting better at drafting.
A fan who cares is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 30th, 2012, 09:20 PM   #15
SoCal Cardfan
Registered
 
SoCal Cardfan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,953
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shane View Post
http://blogs.nfl.com/2012/04/30/card...headline_stack

Should lay to rest the "Fitzgerald is the GM" comments. Even though it won't.

Good stuff on Fitz, Floyd and QB's
I think it's pretty embarrassing he has to "set the record straight" in the first place.

Doesn't lay anything to rest IMO... Him talking about it gives it more credence if anything.
SoCal Cardfan is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Tags
nfl


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Sitemap:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:56 PM.



Subscribe in a reader
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007 - 2008, PixelFX Studios
Inactive Reminders By Icora Web Design