Enjoy an Ads-Free ASFN - lighter and faster too! Become an ASFN-Contributor and help support the site.
Go Back   Arizona Sports Fans Network > Arizona Teams > Arizona Cardinals

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old July 15th, 2006, 07:20 AM   #16
jw7
Woof!
 
jw7's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Ahwatukee
Posts: 7,414
Blog Entries: 1
Send a message via AIM to jw7
Quote:
Originally Posted by MadCardDisease
Unlike previous first round picks, we don't need Lienart to play right away so I'm not worried if he doesn't make training camp on time.
I disagree with this. While we don't need him to play right away, does anyone think Warner is going to make 16 straight games without injury?

He needs to get into camp, learn the system, and more importantly get some preseason experience playing NFL football. The first preseason game is less than a month away and he needs to be throwing in game one and not on the sidelines.
Enjoy an Ads-Free ASFN - lighter and faster too! Become an ASFN-Contributor and help support the site.
__________________


jw7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 15th, 2006, 07:31 AM   #17
masterphomeg
Yeah, I get to play "Left Out"
 
masterphomeg's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Rancho Santa Margarita, CA
Posts: 3,378
I personally think Pope and Watson will be tougher to sign than Leinart. Just a hunch, but it's how I think this will play out. Both of those players know that Cards are counting on them this season, so they may try to take advantage of that.
__________________
"I don't know, Bob...what do you think?"
masterphomeg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 15th, 2006, 08:45 AM   #18
ajcardfan
I see you.
 
ajcardfan's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 19,118
It's really not that hard guys. These rookies all get minimum salaries with the maximum amount of signing bonus to fit their cap number in the rookie pool. It's extremely rare that a guy drafted later gets a larger amount than that. We did it with BJ, but signed Pace just a couple of days later by making up the difference with a roster bonus for the next season.

The Cards and Leinart just have to work out what the future incentives and bonuses will be. At one point, that was a huge problem for this franchise. With some guys, like Wendell Bryant and LJ Shelton, we refused to do anything besides a straight deal. But, that's not the case anymore. It's going to get done. I'd be happy if he signed before camp, but I'm not worried if it takes a few days to get it done.
__________________
We live in a world which is full of misery and ignorance, and the plain duty of each and all of us is to try to make the little corner he can influence somewhat less miserable and somewhat less ignorant than it was before he entered it.

T.H. Huxley
ajcardfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 15th, 2006, 09:17 AM   #19
azcardsfan1616
Fist Pumping With Arians
 
azcardsfan1616's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2002
Location: The Right Side of Rhode Island
Posts: 3,122
Quote:
Originally Posted by jw7
I disagree with this. While we don't need him to play right away, does anyone think Warner is going to make 16 straight games without injury?

He needs to get into camp, learn the system, and more importantly get some preseason experience playing NFL football. The first preseason game is less than a month away and he needs to be throwing in game one and not on the sidelines.
I was going to type the same thing while i was reading the first page. It would be a huge mistake if he is not signed. Warner usually gives you 10 starts. Leinart will play this year and im sure everyone in the cards organization knows it. He needs to learn the system, get familar with Q, fitz, and Edge and most definately play this pre-season. If he holds out and warner gets hurt we will be saying "well theres always next year" again.
azcardsfan1616 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 15th, 2006, 11:10 AM   #20
joeshmo
Kangol Hat Aficionado
 
joeshmo's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,089
As long as Matt is signed in enough time to get some work in all 4 of the preseason games I will be a happy camper. Which probably means he will have to practice a few days before that Pitt game in order for the coaches to even think about playing him for a few series. So my cut off date before I get pissed off in a hold out is the night of August the 9th which means he is in camp by August 10th.

As for the Pope and Watson they will without a doubt be in to camp on time. It isnt even a question. Lets get real, how many 3rd or 4th rounders have ever been involved in a hold out.
__________________
I just spent my live savings on Kangol Hat stock!
joeshmo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 15th, 2006, 12:27 PM   #21
vince56
Registered
 
vince56's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 7,159
Quote:
Originally Posted by joeshmo
Lets get real, how many 3rd or 4th rounders have ever been involved in a hold out.
Was Mark Smith a 2nd or 3rd rounder?
vince56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 15th, 2006, 12:46 PM   #22
azdad1978
Championship!!!!
 
azdad1978's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: ordinance 2257
Posts: 14,959
Quote:
Originally Posted by vince56
Was Mark Smith a 2nd or 3rd rounder?
7th rounder I think.
__________________
Photobucket
azdad1978 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 15th, 2006, 12:50 PM   #23
joeshmo
Kangol Hat Aficionado
 
joeshmo's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,089
Quote:
Originally Posted by vince56
Was Mark Smith a 2nd or 3rd rounder?
He only makes up that portion of the 1% that have in the past and thats the point.

And Mark Smith and his agents were complete idiots combined with the Cards hay day of contract ineptitude. Not a good combo.
__________________
I just spent my live savings on Kangol Hat stock!
joeshmo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 15th, 2006, 01:06 PM   #24
ajcardfan
I see you.
 
ajcardfan's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 19,118
Quote:
Originally Posted by vince56
Was Mark Smith a 2nd or 3rd rounder?
Mark Smith did not hold out on his rookie deal. He held out before the deal was up, and then held out as a tendered restricted free agent the next season.
__________________
We live in a world which is full of misery and ignorance, and the plain duty of each and all of us is to try to make the little corner he can influence somewhat less miserable and somewhat less ignorant than it was before he entered it.

T.H. Huxley
ajcardfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 15th, 2006, 01:07 PM   #25
ajcardfan
I see you.
 
ajcardfan's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 19,118
Quote:
Originally Posted by joeshmo
He only makes up that portion of the 1% that have in the past and thats the point.

And Mark Smith and his agents were complete idiots combined with the Cards hay day of contract ineptitude. Not a good combo.
He didn't hold out on his rookie contract joe. The Cards did draft a DT in the sixth round back in the early to mid 90s who refused to sign his deal and just got another job besides football. His name was Mike Hold, from New Hampshire.
__________________
We live in a world which is full of misery and ignorance, and the plain duty of each and all of us is to try to make the little corner he can influence somewhat less miserable and somewhat less ignorant than it was before he entered it.

T.H. Huxley
ajcardfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 15th, 2006, 03:21 PM   #26
Crimson Warrior
Always a Gentleman
 
Crimson Warrior's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Home of the Thunder
Posts: 3,600
Quote:
Originally Posted by MadCardDisease
Unlike previous first round picks, we don't need Lienart to play right away so I'm not worried if he doesn't make training camp on time.
When was the last time that happened?

2005 - Rolle - badly needed to start

2004 - Fitz - didn't desperately need him to start, but BJ was not sufficient as a #2.

2003 - Pace and Johnson were both "need" picks. Both started

2002 - Wendell "stink up the field" Bryant was desperately needed on the dline.

2001 - Big was a day one starter

2000 - TJ was counted on to start

1999 - was this Wads? I start getting fuzzy since I wasn't on the net much before 2000.

When was the last time that we didn't have the 1st rounder penciled in as a day one starter as soon as they called his name from the podium?
__________________
Best believe someone is paying the pied piper...

Last edited by Crimson Warrior; July 15th, 2006 at 04:26 PM.
Crimson Warrior is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 15th, 2006, 03:53 PM   #27
PACardsFan
Registered User
 
PACardsFan's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2002
Location: York, PA
Posts: 2,734
Quote:
Originally Posted by jw7
I disagree with this. While we don't need him to play right away, does anyone think Warner is going to make 16 straight games without injury?

He needs to get into camp, learn the system, and more importantly get some preseason experience playing NFL football. The first preseason game is less than a month away and he needs to be throwing in game one and not on the sidelines.
I for one hope that Leinart is our 3rd string QB & NEVER sees the field during the regular season. I'll be shocked if Warner goes through the season uscathed, so I'd rather have Navarre playing than Leinart. Why do we want to rush this kid? Navarre has a big arm & would do just fine in this offense. What the Bengals did with Carson Palmer was pure genious. I hope the Cardinals do the same.
PACardsFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 15th, 2006, 04:19 PM   #28
Shane
I'm Coming for YOU!
 
Shane's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2002
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 45,135
Quote:
Originally Posted by PACardsFan
I for one hope that Leinart is our 3rd string QB & NEVER sees the field during the regular season. I'll be shocked if Warner goes through the season uscathed, so I'd rather have Navarre playing than Leinart. Why do we want to rush this kid? Navarre has a big arm & would do just fine in this offense. What the Bengals did with Carson Palmer was pure genious. I hope the Cardinals do the same.

If Navarre is #2 we are in trouble. He has shown nothing that says "he will be fine" Leinart better be the #2 or something is wrong.
Shane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 15th, 2006, 04:36 PM   #29
ReddBird
Registered
 

Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 328
I'm with you, PACardsFan. If Warner goes down, I want to see Navarre step in. And I'd love to see him actually get to play for two or three complete games...just to see if he can do what Green says he can do. I keep hearing that Leinart is the Next Great QB but he hasn't proved it yet on this level. Give him time, let him learn. When I watched the So Cal games, I discovered that Leinart can do good when he's got lots of time. Pushed hard, he rattled. The rushing game gave USC the victory against Arizona -- Leinart looked very ordinary.
ReddBird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 15th, 2006, 04:37 PM   #30
PACardsFan
Registered User
 
PACardsFan's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2002
Location: York, PA
Posts: 2,734
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shane H
If Navarre is #2 we are in trouble. He has shown nothing that says "he will be fine" Leinart better be the #2 or something is wrong.
What chance has Navarre had to show anything. He broke his finger in the 1st half of his only start & then had mop-up duty in another game. As bad as our OL has been, what could anyone expect. The last thing this organization needs is Warner going down in week 3 & Leinart being thrust into a situation he's not ready for. Navarre could easily lead this team to 9 or 10 wins. Leinart will be great real soon, but I hope we don't need him this year.
PACardsFan is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Tags
adrian wilson, alex smith, carson palmer, crimson warrior, david boston, ernie sims, john clayton, leron mccoy, mark smith, preseason game, rookie season, season game, season games, signing bonus



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Sitemap:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:01 PM.



Subscribe in a reader
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007 - 2008, PixelFX Studios
Inactive Reminders By Icora Web Design