Enjoy an Ads-Free ASFN - lighter and faster too! Become an ASFN-Contributor and help support the site.
Go Back   Arizona Sports Fans Network > Other Stuff > Politics and Religion > 2008 Presidential Election

Welcome to ASFN Fan Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.


Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old June 4th, 2007, 12:06 PM   #1
Folster
Registered User
 
Folster's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,320
A$FN: 1,000

Umm.. Democratic Debate?


Where are you dems at? Maybe I missed the thread somewhere.

MANCHESTER, New Hampshire (CNN) -- Democratic presidential hopefuls traded barbs over the war in Iraq Sunday night in New Hampshire, with former Sen. John Edwards blasting two rivals for not taking the lead on a recent war spending bill.

Edwards said his opponents "have been quiet" on calling for a plan to withdraw U.S. troops from Iraq.

"They went quietly to the floor of the Senate, cast the right vote -- but there is a difference between leadership and legislators," Edwards said at the Democratic presidential debate in Manchester, New Hampshire.

"The importance of this is, they're asking to be president of the United States," he said. "And there is a difference between making clear, speaking to your followers, speaking to the American people about what you believe needs to be done, and I think all of us have a responsibility to lead on these issues."

Edwards voted for the October 2002 resolution that authorized the invasion of Iraq, but now calls that vote a mistake.

Sen. Barack Obama, of Illinois, who opposed the war before taking office in 2005, shot back that "I opposed this war from the start." (Watch contenders clash over Iraq war )

"You're about four and a half years late on leadership on this issue," Obama said "And, you know, I think it's important not to play politics on something that is as critical and as difficult as this."

Hillary Clinton also voted to authorize the March 2003 invasion, but the New York senator and former first lady said she was supporting "coercive diplomacy" by pressuring Iraq to allow U.N. weapons inspectors into the country.

But she said President Bush short-circuited the inspections to launch the war; and when it came time to vote on another $100 billion in war spending, "I thought the best way to support our troops was to send a very strong message that they should begin to come home." (Gallery: Behind the scenes at the debate)

Edwards later acknowledged Obama "deserves credit for being against this war from the beginning." And Clinton added, "The differences between us are minor. The differences between us and the Republicans are major."

Kucinich: 'The money's in the pipeline'

Rep. Dennis Kucinich, D-Ohio, an early and outspoken opponent of the invasion who mounted an anti-war campaign in 2004, said the way to end the war was to cut off funding.

"The money's in the pipeline right now, enough to bring the troops home," he said. "Let's end the war, and let's make this a productive evening."

But Sen. Joseph Biden, D-Delaware, said opponents of the war need to realize Democrats do not have the 67 votes needed to override a veto and force an end to the war.

"As long as there is a single troop in Iraq that I know if I take action by funding them, I increase the prospect they will live or not be injured, I cannot and will not vote no to fund them," said Biden, the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

Former Alaska Sen. Mike Gravel, who served in the Senate during the Vietnam War, said anyone who voted to authorize the invasion should not be president.

"We have killed more Americans than was done on the 11th of September," Gravel said. "More Americans died because of their decision. That disqualifies them for president."

The last question was from a local schoolteacher who asked what each candidate would make top priority in the first 100 days in office.
Clinton said she would end the war in Iraq. Obama echoed that goal, and added he would "get moving" on health care. Biden also topped his list with ending the Iraq war, and said he would defuse tensions with Iran and North Korea. Gravel said he would work to convince Democratic congressional leadership to end the war now.

Sen. Christopher Dodd of Connecticut said he would restore constitutional rights damaged by the Bush administration. New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson said he would improve American education. Kucinich's top priority was to help "reshape the world for peace." And Edwards said he would travel the world to "re-establish America's moral authority." (Read full text of each candidate's response)

First time face-off in New Hampshire

Sunday's face-off at St. Anselm College was the first time the Democratic contenders shared a stage in New Hampshire, home of the nation's first presidential primary. The debate was staged by CNN, WMUR and the New Hampshire Union Leader. (Read what CNN's experts thought of the debate)

The war was expected to dominate discussion -- particularly after the heated congressional debate on the spending bill and the Democratic leadership's decision to drop calls for a withdrawal after Bush's May 1 veto.

Nearly 3,500 U.S. troops have been killed in in Iraq, and the war is now widely unpopular. New Hampshire state Sen. Lou D'Allesandro, a Manchester Democrat, said the war has hit close to home in New Hampshire "because of the number of National Guard people there."
"You are witnessing your friends and neighbors passing away or being killed," said D'Allesandro, who has not yet endorsed a candidate.
Clinton has held a consistent lead in recent polls, averaging 41 percent in a CNN survey of national polls in May. Obama trailed with 26 percent, while Edwards rounded out the top tier at 14 percent.
Biden, Kucinich, Richardson and Dodd trailed far behind, with support in the low single digits. Gravel's support failed to hit 1 percent.

Some common ground among the contenders

The hopefuls shared some common ground during Sunday's face-off in Saint Anselm's hockey arena. All nine said they would repeal the U.S. military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy barring homosexuals from serving openly, and all but Gravel said they would oppose making English an official language.

The candidates said they would work toward extending health insurance to all Americans. Clinton, who took on that task in a failed effort during her husband's presidency, said she was "thrilled" to see the issue back on the agenda.

"The most important thing is not the plan, because there are only a few ways to do this," she said. "And we're all talking pretty much about the same things. From my perspective, we have to lower cost, improve quality and cover everybody."

But Kucinich said the other candidates' proposals all assume that private insurers would extend coverage.

"We need a president who is ready to challenge that," said Kucinich, who favors a Canadian-style single-payer system. "And I'm ready to challenge the insurance companies."

The Granite State's primary -- historically a make-or-break contest for presidential campaigns -- is set for January 22. Front-runners go into New Hampshire hoping to demonstrate their strength, while underdogs try to use its tradition of informal, "retail" politics to engineer a breakthrough.

The 10 Republican presidential hopefuls will face off on the same stage at 7 p.m. ET Tuesday.
Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!

Last edited by Folster; June 4th, 2007 at 12:09 PM.
Folster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 4th, 2007, 12:10 PM   #2
dreamcastrocks
You know what ASFN needs?
 
dreamcastrocks's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 26,984
A$FN: 50
I didn't even know that it was on.

I'll have to set my DVR for the repub debate.
__________________
DCR loves DRC
dreamcastrocks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 4th, 2007, 12:13 PM   #3
Divide Et Impera
Registered User
 

Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Maricopa, AZ
Posts: 8,544
A$FN: 2,740
I enjoyed it. There were some really testy moments. Edwards really rapped Clinton and Obama over the recent legislation and the lack of leadership through their silence....

Obama rapped Edwards and Clinton over their original vote on IWR and their failure to read the NIE before voting....

There were some fireworks that night and Kucinich had some excellent points, but he absolutely failed on Darfur....

Overall, I actually think Biden won. He is a firebrand politician....
Divide Et Impera is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 4th, 2007, 12:20 PM   #4
Folster
Registered User
 
Folster's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,320
A$FN: 1,000
Kucinich also failed big time on the dumb Bin Laden question. It's nice to know that if Kucinich has an opportunity to take out Bin Laden he wouldn't.

I believe it was Obama who nailed him on it afterwards.
Folster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 4th, 2007, 12:23 PM   #5
dreamcastrocks
You know what ASFN needs?
 
dreamcastrocks's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 26,984
A$FN: 50
Any replays? Was this on MSNBC or FOX?
__________________
DCR loves DRC
dreamcastrocks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 4th, 2007, 12:24 PM   #6
Folster
Registered User
 
Folster's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,320
A$FN: 1,000
Cnn

Last edited by Folster; June 4th, 2007 at 12:26 PM.
Folster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 4th, 2007, 12:30 PM   #7
Divide Et Impera
Registered User
 

Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Maricopa, AZ
Posts: 8,544
A$FN: 2,740
That's right! He literally BOMBED that OBL question. I accept collateral damages when there is a legitimate justification for them and OBL would be jsut taht justification. On the other hand, I would almost like to see him trotted out for trial and then executed by the hands of the State, but I still wouldn't pass on that opportunity....
Divide Et Impera is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 4th, 2007, 01:07 PM   #8
Donald
G.A.M.
 
Donald's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: In The End Zone
Posts: 30,657
A$FN: 61,200
Send a message via MSN to Donald
Quote:
Originally Posted by Divide Et Impera View Post

Overall, I actually think Biden won. He is a firebrand politician....
I like Biden...he's a Democrat I could vote for. Too bad someone has pictures of him with a goat or something, because he never goes after the nomination very hard.
__________________
Quote:
Mr. Garrison: Kenny, would you please climb that ladder and take down the star above the stage?
Donald is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 4th, 2007, 01:15 PM   #9
82CardsGrad
What is most important to you?
 
82CardsGrad's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Scottsdale
Posts: 8,505
A$FN: 218,850
Quote:
Originally Posted by Donald View Post
I like Biden...he's a Democrat I could vote for. Too bad someone has pictures of him with a goat or something, because he never goes after the nomination very hard.
Agreed... Of all of them, and if I don't start to get any warm & fuzzies from the current batch of Republicans, I could see myself voting for Biden...

I really liked his respons last night regarding the recently passed Iraq funding bill... Straightforward. Pragmatic. Logical...
82CardsGrad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 4th, 2007, 04:03 PM   #10
KloD
Pimping Freedom Ain't Easy
 
Asteroids Champion! Cosmic Defender Champion!
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 8,193
A$FN: 24,013
Quote:
Originally Posted by Folster View Post
It's nice to know that if Kucinich has an opportunity to take out Bin Laden he wouldn't.
Much like the current administration, huh?
KloD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 5th, 2007, 05:44 AM   #11
Djaughe
Ads by Google
 

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: 85249
Posts: 22,973
A$FN: 264

All those hands that went up were willing to sacrifice you and your family like pawns


Here's a snippet of the OBL question:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HCNM-AXWEBU

On a side note its funny how CNN seated the candidates so that we can look at Hillary and Obama with a straight camera shot...meanwhile CNN goes and plants Kucinich and Gravel so far off to the sides. I guess they didn't want them to bother anybody.
Djaughe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 5th, 2007, 05:04 PM   #12
swd1974
Registered User
 
swd1974's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2003
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 13,181
A$FN: 50
Send a message via AIM to swd1974
ONe, thats right, one dem said English should be our national language. The party has become a joke.

Meanwhile, Rudy, McCain and a guy whos name I forgot (the mormon) sound good. The religious answers made me vomit but oh well cant have it all I guess.
__________________
Goal for 2008: Half as many penalties.
swd1974 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 5th, 2007, 05:07 PM   #13
Divide Et Impera
Registered User
 

Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Maricopa, AZ
Posts: 8,544
A$FN: 2,740
I disagree (surprise!)....

Hillary NAILED the "national" vs "official" language question....
Divide Et Impera is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 5th, 2007, 05:48 PM   #14
krepitch
Moderator
 
krepitch's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 9,830
A$FN: 6,059
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by swd1974 View Post
The religious answers made me vomit but oh well cant have it all I guess.
Your house must have filthy when three of the ten Republican candidates said they don't believe in evolution.
krepitch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 5th, 2007, 05:49 PM   #15
krepitch
Moderator
 
krepitch's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 9,830
A$FN: 6,059
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Divide Et Impera View Post
I disagree (surprise!)....

Hillary NAILED the "national" vs "official" language question....
What did she say?
krepitch is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
john edwards


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Sitemap:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:41 AM.



Subscribe in a reader
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007 - 2008, PixelFX Studios
Copyright © 2002 - 2006 ArizonaSportsFans.com
Inactive Reminders By Icora Web Design