Welcome to ASFN Fan Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.
Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!
Dr. Paul's stance is the Federal Government has no business making decisions in either of those areas.
He is stout pro life, he was the Senetor that introduced The Sanctity of Life Act of 2005 that defined human life to begin at conception, and removed challenges to prohibitions on abortion from federal court jurisdiction. It would overturn Roe V Wade and put the laws in the hands of the states
He is stout pro life, he was the Senetor that introduced The Sanctity of Life Act of 2005 that defined human life to begin at conception, and removed challenges to prohibitions on abortion from federal court jurisdiction. It would overturn Roe V Wade and put the laws in the hands of the states
He is stout pro life, he was the Senetor that introduced The Sanctity of Life Act of 2005 that defined human life to begin at conception, and removed challenges to prohibitions on abortion from federal court jurisdiction. It would overturn Roe V Wade and put the laws in the hands of the states
That pretty much sounds like he is making the government make decisions in those areas
He isn't a senator. Never has been.
I think this is what it is about. the provision of public expense of funds, facilities, personnel, or other assistance for the performance of abortions
Plus even if he is the President he can't overturn Roe v. Wade.
He isn't the supreme court.
If it is turned over to the states isn't that taking the federal government out of it?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mulli
It seems that if he truly wanted the Federal Government to stay out of it, he would not have the Federal Government defining when conception begins.
I think this is what it is about. the provision of public expense of funds, facilities, personnel, or other assistance for the performance of abortions
Plus even if he is the President he can't overturn Roe v. Wade.
He isn't the supreme court.
If it is turned over to the states isn't that taking the federal government out of it?
`Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 1253, 1254, and 1257, the Supreme Court shall not have jurisdiction to review, by appeal, writ of certiorari, or otherwise, any case arising out of any statute, ordinance, rule, regulation, practice, or any part thereof, or arising out of any act interpreting, applying, enforcing, or effecting any statute, ordinance, rule, regulation, or practice, on the grounds that such statute, ordinance, rule, regulation, practice, act, or part thereof--
Great an end run around the Supreme Court. Nice one Paul.
GO
Linear Mode
