Enjoy an Ads-Free ASFN - lighter and faster too! Become an ASFN-Contributor and help support the site.
Go Back   Arizona Sports Fans Network > Other Stuff > Politics and Religion > 2008 Presidential Election

Welcome to ASFN Fan Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.


Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old September 23rd, 2008, 12:44 PM   #1
lvgentleman
Gunslingers!
 
lvgentleman's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Vegas, baby, yeah!
Posts: 1,946
A$FN: 39,750

Obama / Palin '08


Summary of the article - in a 269 / 269 split, the outgoing congress chooses the Pres / VP.

House is controlled by the Dems, so Obama becomes President.

In the Senate, with Lieberman defecting, is deadlocked 50 / 50. Cheney steps in and votes for Palin.

Hence - Obama / Palin administration.

Article here.
Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!
__________________
LET'S DO THIS!

Odi profanum vulgus et arceo.
lvgentleman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 23rd, 2008, 12:46 PM   #2
schutd
Regular User
 
schutd's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Harlem, NYC
Posts: 4,064
A$FN: 6,000
Im researching my EU citizenship requirements. Just in case.
schutd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 23rd, 2008, 12:58 PM   #3
Yuma
Out of posting retirement!
 

Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,834
A$FN: 1,000
That's hilarious! Just think, Obama thought Hillary and Bill would be hard to control in the White House! I can just see Michelle Obama and Sarah Palin doing tea together! LOL!
__________________
KOC Rules!
Yuma's Dad RIP 03/22/07


I still have a gut feeling Shaq will be better next season (2008/2009) after our docs have a full off season to work their magic on the Big Saguaro!
Yuma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 23rd, 2008, 02:06 PM   #4
LoyaltyisaCurse
Answers Before Questions
 
LoyaltyisaCurse's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Chatsworth, CA
Posts: 12,414
A$FN: 4,800
This looks alot like my prediction: http://www.arizonasportsfans.com/vb/...21&postcount=1
__________________
Goin' "Double Maverick!"
LoyaltyisaCurse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 23rd, 2008, 04:46 PM   #5
Dback Jon
Random Encounter
 
Dback Jon's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2002
Location: Chandler
Posts: 24,155
A$FN: 69,214
Actually, the premise is incorrect. The NEWLY ELECTED SENATE will pick the VP.

Most likely, a clear Democratic majority Senate, so no Palin.
__________________



R.I.P Tim Minnick

The KING of Cards
Dback Jon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 23rd, 2008, 04:47 PM   #6
cheesebeef
Registered User
 

Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 20,940
A$FN: 6,085
i would die laughing if this happened. Honestly, it would make for a hilarious sitcom/movie.
__________________
Rubarb is what makes my feet look cheese!

Watch Cheesebeef's Short Films on YOUTUBE!

1. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pk4GFsybUwg

2. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUvI-VLklZM
cheesebeef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 23rd, 2008, 04:48 PM   #7
KloD
Pimping Freedom Ain't Easy
 
Cosmic Defender Champion!
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 8,210
A$FN: 21,353
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dback Jon View Post
Actually, the premise is incorrect. The NEWLY ELECTED SENATE will pick the VP.

Most likely, a clear Democratic majority Senate, so no Palin.
That's what I thought, by the time they vote.. the new Senate will be seated.
KloD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 23rd, 2008, 04:50 PM   #8
KloD
Pimping Freedom Ain't Easy
 
Cosmic Defender Champion!
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 8,210
A$FN: 21,353
Quote:
Originally Posted by cheesebeef View Post
i would die laughing if this happened. Honestly, it would make for a hilarious sitcom/movie.
I find it hard to believe they're isn't a pilot already in the works.
KloD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 23rd, 2008, 04:55 PM   #9
Dback Jon
Random Encounter
 
Dback Jon's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2002
Location: Chandler
Posts: 24,155
A$FN: 69,214
Quote:
Originally Posted by KloD View Post
I find it hard to believe they're isn't a pilot already in the works.
The new Odd Couple
__________________



R.I.P Tim Minnick

The KING of Cards
Dback Jon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 23rd, 2008, 05:28 PM   #10
lvgentleman
Gunslingers!
 
lvgentleman's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Vegas, baby, yeah!
Posts: 1,946
A$FN: 39,750
The Senate / House actually, by what is inferred, votes prior to the new Congress being seated.

Per the 12th Amendment: In the event of a tie, the House will vote for President immediately.

The Electoral College votes in each state capital (they never meet as one large group) on the first Monday following second Wednesday in December.

Or 15 December 2008.

The new congress is not sworn in until January 5 2009.
__________________
LET'S DO THIS!

Odi profanum vulgus et arceo.
lvgentleman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 23rd, 2008, 06:50 PM   #11
KloD
Pimping Freedom Ain't Easy
 
Cosmic Defender Champion!
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 8,210
A$FN: 21,353
Quote:
Originally Posted by lvgentleman View Post
The Senate / House actually, by what is inferred, votes prior to the new Congress being seated.

Per the 12th Amendment: In the event of a tie, the House will vote for President immediately.

The Electoral College votes in each state capital (they never meet as one large group) on the first Monday following second Wednesday in December.

Or 15 December 2008.

The new congress is not sworn in until January 5 2009.
I thought they formally count the electoral votes on the 6th day of January. Therefore it would be the new congress that would choose the Pres/VP. The election in Nov. isn't the official vote, that takes place on Jan. 6th.

I might be wrong, but it sounds right from what I remember.

EDIT: Here we go.

Section 15. Counting electoral votes in Congress
Congress shall be in session on the sixth day of January succeeding every meeting of the electors. The Senate and House of Representatives shall meet in the Hall of the House of Representatives at the hour of 1 o'clock in the afternoon on that day, and the President of the Senate shall be their presiding officer. Two tellers shall be previously appointed on the part of the Senate and two on the part of the House of Representatives, to whom shall be handed, as they are opened by the President of the Senate, all the certificates and papers purporting to be certificates of the electoral votes, which certificates and papers shall be opened, presented, and acted upon in the alphabetical order of the States, beginning with the letter A; and said tellers, having then read the same in the presence and hearing of the two Houses, shall make a list of the votes as they shall appear from the said certificates; and the votes having been ascertained and counted according to the rules in this subchapter provided, the result of the same shall be delivered to the President of the Senate, who shall thereupon announce the state of the vote, which announcement shall be deemed a sufficient declaration of the persons, if any, elected President and Vice President of the United States, and, together with a list of the votes, be entered on the Journals of the two Houses. Upon such reading of any such certificate or paper, the President of the Senate shall call for objections, if any. Every objection shall be made in writing, and shall state clearly and concisely, and without argument, the ground thereof, and shall be signed by at least one Senator and one Member of the House of Representatives before the same shall be received. When all objections so made to any vote or paper from a State shall have been received and read, the Senate shall thereupon withdraw, and such objections shall be submitted to the Senate for its decision; and the Speaker of the House of Representatives shall, in like manner, submit such objections to the House of Representatives for its decision; and no electoral vote or votes from any State which shall have been regularly given by electors whose appointment has been lawfully certified to according to section 6 of this title from which but one return has been received shall be rejected, but the two Houses concurrently may reject the vote or votes when they agree that such vote or votes have not been so regularly given by electors whose appointment has been so certified. If more than one return or paper purporting to be a return from a State shall have been received by the President of the Senate, those votes, and those only, shall be counted which shall have been regularly given by the electors who are shown by the determination mentioned in section 5 of this title to have been appointed, if the determination in said section provided for shall have been made, or by such successors or substitutes, in case of a vacancy in the board of electors so ascertained, as have been appointed to fill such vacancy in the mode provided by the laws of the State; but in case there shall arise the question which of two or more of such State authorities determining what electors have been appointed, as mentioned in section 5 of this title, is the lawful tribunal of such State, the votes regularly given of those electors, and those only, of such State shall be counted whose title as electors the two Houses, acting separately, shall concurrently decide is supported by the decision of such State so authorized by its law; and in such case of more than one return or paper purporting to be a return from a State, if there shall have been no such determination of the question in the State aforesaid, then those votes, and those only, shall be counted which the two Houses shall concurrently decide were cast by lawful electors appointed in accordance with the laws of the State, unless the two Houses, acting separately, shall concurrently decide such votes not to be the lawful votes of the legally appointed electors of such State. But if the two Houses shall disagree in respect of the counting of such votes, then, and in that case, the votes of the electors whose appointment shall have been certified by the executive of the State, under the seal thereof, shall be counted. When the two Houses have voted, they shall immediately again meet, and the presiding officer shall then announce the decision of the questions submitted. No votes or papers from any other State shall be acted upon until the objections previously made to the votes or papers from any State shall have been finally disposed of.http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/caseco...ection_15.html

Last edited by KloD; September 23rd, 2008 at 06:53 PM.
KloD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 23rd, 2008, 09:31 PM   #12
hsandhu
Registered User
 

Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,423
A$FN: 1,000
Never would happen. Why?

Because lieberman is tied to mccain, he knows palin is a joke. Plus, biden is his long time friend of course he'll vote for biden.
hsandhu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 24th, 2008, 06:11 PM   #13
lvgentleman
Gunslingers!
 
lvgentleman's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Vegas, baby, yeah!
Posts: 1,946
A$FN: 39,750
Klod - that gets into the argument of USC verses the language of the Constitution.

Regardless, if a tie did happen, a legal challenge would be filed (since they apparently are contradictory), and it would have to go through the courts so that it could be interpreted.
__________________
LET'S DO THIS!

Odi profanum vulgus et arceo.
lvgentleman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 24th, 2008, 06:15 PM   #14
arthurracoon
The Cardinal Smiles
 
arthurracoon's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Tucson/PHX AZ
Posts: 15,423
A$FN: 12,500
that would be hilarious!
__________________
Signed,

arthurpostpadder

arthurracoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 24th, 2008, 08:03 PM   #15
KloD
Pimping Freedom Ain't Easy
 
Cosmic Defender Champion!
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 8,210
A$FN: 21,353
Quote:
Originally Posted by lvgentleman View Post
Klod - that gets into the argument of USC verses the language of the Constitution.

Regardless, if a tie did happen, a legal challenge would be filed (since they apparently are contradictory), and it would have to go through the courts so that it could be interpreted.
Not to argue this further.... BUT.....

I suppose it could be put before the courts, but I don't see the conflict.

The 12th says immediately, but the rules state that the official count is done January 6th. So immediately after the votes are found to be an official tie (On Jan. 6th) the rest of the process would continue. Therefore, the new Congress would make the selections.

I don't see how it can be interpreted any other way. If the vote isn't official, our knowing the results doesn't make it any more so.
KloD is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Sitemap:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:56 PM.



Subscribe in a reader
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007 - 2008, PixelFX Studios
Copyright © 2002 - 2006 ArizonaSportsFans.com
Inactive Reminders By Icora Web Design