Enjoy an Ads-Free ASFN - lighter and faster too! Become an ASFN-Contributor and help support the site.
Go Back   Arizona Sports Fans Network > Other Stuff > Politics and Religion > 2008 Presidential Election

Welcome to ASFN Fan Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.


Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old March 6th, 2008, 07:59 AM   #1
dreamcastrocks
You know what ASFN needs?
 
dreamcastrocks's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 27,543
A$FN: 131,289

Howard Dean now wants to count Florida/Michigan


After stating last week that he did not think that Florida/Michigan should be reseated, he has a change of opinion.


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080306/...imary_scramble


Dean urges do-over voting in Fla., Mich.


WASHINGTON - Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean urged Florida and Michigan party officials to come up with plans to repeat their presidential nominating contests so that their delegates can be counted.


"All they have to do is come before us with rules that fit into what they agreed to a year and a half ago, and then they'll be seated," Dean said during a round of interviews Thursday on network and cable TV news programs.

The two state parties will have to find the funds to pay for new contests without help from the national party, Dean said.

"We can't afford to do that. That's not our problem. We need our money to win the presidential race," he said.

Officials in Michigan and Florida are showing renewed interest in holding repeat presidential nominating contests so that their votes will count in the epic Democratic campaign.

The Michigan governor, top officials in Hillary Rodham Clinton's campaign, and Florida's state party chair all are now saying they would consider holding a sort of do-over contest by June. That's a change from the previous insistence from officials in both states that the primaries they held in January should determine how their delegates are allocated.

Clinton won both contests, but the results were meaningless because the elections violated national party rules.

The Democratic National Committee stripped both states of all delegates for holding the primaries too early, and all Democratic candidates — including Clinton and rival Barack Obama — agreed not to campaign in either state. Obama's name wasn't even on the Michigan ballot.

Florida and Michigan moved up their dates to protest the party's decision to allow Iowa and New Hampshire to go first, followed by South Carolina and Nevada, giving them a disproportionate influence on the presidential selection process.

But no one predicted the race would still be very close at this point in the year.

"The rules were set a year and a half ago," Dean said. "Florida and Michigan voted for them, then decided that they didn't need to abide by the rules. Well, when you are in a contest you do need to abide by the rules. Everybody has to play by the rules out of respect for both campaigns and the other 48 states."

Hey Mr. Dean, how can you abide by the rules to have a primary on a specific date, if that date has already passed?
Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!
dreamcastrocks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 6th, 2008, 08:02 AM   #2
Shane H
It's Cardinal RED
 
Shane H's Avatar
 
Space Invaders Champion!
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 25,833
A$FN: 8,500,000


This is going to be fun watching the Dems tear each other apart over the couple of months. You cant pay for drama like this. ITS FRICKEN GREAT!
__________________
“They said the road comes through Seattle. We came through here and took care of business.” Anquan Boldin




Shane H is online now   Reply With Quote
Old March 6th, 2008, 08:02 AM   #3
Linderbee
That's not Snowflake!!
 
Linderbee's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: MESA! :thud:
Posts: 19,099
A$FN: 500,000
Blog Entries: 1
I'd be fine with this. If they want to have a do-over, that's fine. Obama would be campaigning in those states & it would be much more fair.

The thread title makes it sound as though Dean wants the delegates to count as-is, which I am adamantly against.
__________________
dreamcastrocks--My Hero!!
Linderbee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 6th, 2008, 08:09 AM   #4
Shane H
It's Cardinal RED
 
Shane H's Avatar
 
Space Invaders Champion!
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 25,833
A$FN: 8,500,000
Quote:
Originally Posted by Linderbee View Post
I'd be fine with this. If they want to have a do-over, that's fine. Obama would be campaigning in those states & it would be much more fair.

The thread title makes it sound as though Dean wants the delegates to count as-is, which I am adamantly against.
I 100% agree with that. The fact that these sanction were brought against the states is beyond ludicrous to begin with. The Democratic citizens in those states ABSOLUTELY HAVE A RIGHT to have their votes count in this election and every election.

They shouldnt be penalized because some of the higher ups decided to change a fricken date.

Its beyond stupid.
__________________
“They said the road comes through Seattle. We came through here and took care of business.” Anquan Boldin




Shane H is online now   Reply With Quote
Old March 6th, 2008, 08:09 AM   #5
dreamcastrocks
You know what ASFN needs?
 
dreamcastrocks's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 27,543
A$FN: 131,289
I'm torn.

Technically in the rules, the primary dates can be after Feb 5th, and before the convention. So they could redo the states, and still be within the "rules".

I think that it greatly favors Clinton vs. Obama though.
dreamcastrocks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 6th, 2008, 08:16 AM   #6
Shane H
It's Cardinal RED
 
Shane H's Avatar
 
Space Invaders Champion!
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 25,833
A$FN: 8,500,000
Quote:
Originally Posted by dreamcastrocks View Post
I'm torn.

Technically in the rules, the primary dates can be after Feb 5th, and before the convention. So they could redo the states, and still be within the "rules".

I think that it greatly favors Clinton vs. Obama though.
But the right thing to do. Honestly!
__________________
“They said the road comes through Seattle. We came through here and took care of business.” Anquan Boldin




Shane H is online now   Reply With Quote
Old March 6th, 2008, 08:19 AM   #7
dreamcastrocks
You know what ASFN needs?
 
dreamcastrocks's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 27,543
A$FN: 131,289
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shane H View Post
But the right thing to do. Honestly!
If we have a brokered convention, then yes. I agree.

I'd rather we redo these states if it will prevent a brokered convention.
dreamcastrocks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 6th, 2008, 08:21 AM   #8
Pariah
H.S.
 
Pariah's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Aventine
Posts: 28,605
A$FN: 41,963
When people vote in primaries, is it tax dollars that pays for things like the voting machines and polling stations? Or, does the party pay for everything?
__________________
America cannot have an empire abroad and a Republic at home.
Pariah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 6th, 2008, 08:23 AM   #9
Linderbee
That's not Snowflake!!
 
Linderbee's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: MESA! :thud:
Posts: 19,099
A$FN: 500,000
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shane H View Post
I 100% agree with that. The fact that these sanction were brought against the states is beyond ludicrous to begin with. The Democratic citizens in those states ABSOLUTELY HAVE A RIGHT to have their votes count in this election and every election.

They shouldnt be penalized because some of the higher ups decided to change a fricken date.

Its beyond stupid.
I'm not at all upset that their votes don't count. Those states voted for the rules as they are. Then those states decided that they didn't have to follow the rules that THEY VOTED FOR. If I were a citizen of one of those states, hell yes, I'd be pissed, and I'd be taking it out come election day for whatever officials were responsible.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dreamcastrocks View Post
I'm torn.

Technically in the rules, the primary dates can be after Feb 5th, and before the convention. So they could redo the states, and still be within the "rules".

I think that it greatly favors Clinton vs. Obama though.
I don't think it would affect the outcome that much. I know Obama isn't popular in Michigan/Detroit, but she hasn't been killing him much of anywhere. Given enough time to campaign properly, I think he could come out of those states without losing much, if any, ground.

I just don't think it's going to happen. I don't think either state is going to pony up the dough to make it happen.
__________________
dreamcastrocks--My Hero!!
Linderbee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 6th, 2008, 08:24 AM   #10
Linderbee
That's not Snowflake!!
 
Linderbee's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: MESA! :thud:
Posts: 19,099
A$FN: 500,000
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pariah View Post
When people vote in primaries, is it tax dollars that pays for things like the voting machines and polling stations? Or, does the party pay for everything?
According to the article, the states would have to come up with the money--the party would not be willing to fund it.

edit: the state parties would have to fund, not the national party. Not sure entirely how that works.
__________________
dreamcastrocks--My Hero!!
Linderbee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 6th, 2008, 08:35 AM   #11
dreamcastrocks
You know what ASFN needs?
 
dreamcastrocks's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 27,543
A$FN: 131,289
Quote:
Originally Posted by Linderbee View Post
I'm not at all upset that their votes don't count. Those states voted for the rules as they are. Then those states decided that they didn't have to follow the rules that THEY VOTED FOR. If I were a citizen of one of those states, hell yes, I'd be pissed, and I'd be taking it out come election day for whatever officials were responsible.

I don't think it would affect the outcome that much. I know Obama isn't popular in Michigan/Detroit, but she hasn't been killing him much of anywhere. Given enough time to campaign properly, I think he could come out of those states without losing much, if any, ground.

I just don't think it's going to happen. I don't think either state is going to pony up the dough to make it happen.


I don't think that Hillary will be able to claim much of a delegate advantage. There are a total of 341 from Florida/Michigan. Even if Hillary wins both states by 10%, Hillary will get about 188 delegates to 153. Even with that 35 delegates swing, most people don't think that will be enough to overtake Obama. Who knows what happens to the superdelegates if she wins both states though. Their opinion might change. I'm not sure if Obama will have enough delegates to gain the 2025 needed, even with the included 153 from Florida/Michigan. It is pretty clear that Hillary won't have enough either.
dreamcastrocks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 6th, 2008, 08:43 AM   #12
82CardsGrad
What is most important to you?
 
82CardsGrad's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Scottsdale
Posts: 8,804
A$FN: 164,050
The Dems have literally blown an amazing, historical opportunity... A black man and a women are "this" close to the White House. It should be a celebrated and memorialized affair... Instead, they come up with some whacky, non-populist Super Delegate structure (yes, I know this was actually created decades ago), that in and of itself can destroy the party. They then construct a set of rules and their party represenatives in two states choose to ignore the rules, leading to the great FLA-MI crises we now see playing out today...

The Democratic Party...the party that was supposed to bring faith and trust back to American politics, is literally on the brink of creating more dysfunction and more distrust than anything the Republicans have done over the last 20 years!! Incredible...
82CardsGrad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 6th, 2008, 08:44 AM   #13
earthsci
He said the sheriff is near.
 
earthsci's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2002
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 5,261
A$FN: 4,800
I don't understand. How is Howard Dean "urging" a do-over or how is does he "want to count Florida/Michigan"? What I read was Dean saying - if they want their delegates to count they are welcome to have a do over which abides by the rules. The Democratic National party WILL NOT fund those do-overs. Those are the rules, they agreed to them, they will live with them.
__________________
earthsci is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 6th, 2008, 08:45 AM   #14
Linderbee
That's not Snowflake!!
 
Linderbee's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: MESA! :thud:
Posts: 19,099
A$FN: 500,000
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by 82CardsGrad View Post
The Democratic Party...the party that was supposed to bring faith and trust back to American politics, is literally on the brink of creating more dysfunction and more distrust than anything the Republicans have done over the last 20 years!! Incredible...
I think that's a stretch...
__________________
dreamcastrocks--My Hero!!
Linderbee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 6th, 2008, 08:46 AM   #15
dreamcastrocks
You know what ASFN needs?
 
dreamcastrocks's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 27,543
A$FN: 131,289
Quote:
Originally Posted by earthsci View Post
I don't understand. How is Howard Dean "urging" a do-over or how is does he "want to count Florida/Michigan"? What I read was Dean saying - if they want their delegates to count they are welcome to have a do over which abides by the rules. The Democratic National party WILL NOT fund those do-overs. Those are the rules, they agreed to them, they will live with them.
I didn't write the article....just posted it.
dreamcastrocks is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
howard dean


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Sitemap:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:54 PM.



Subscribe in a reader
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007 - 2008, PixelFX Studios