January 19th, 2008, 07:12 PM
|
#1
|
|
I'm Coming for YOU!
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 45,145
|
Delegate count
Anyone know a good site where you can track the count on delegates as the elections move forwrd? I know donald posted a link to one at one time but I cant find it?
|
|
|
January 19th, 2008, 07:27 PM
|
#3
|
|
I'm Coming for YOU!
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 45,145
|
Thanks dude!
|
|
|
January 28th, 2008, 07:52 AM
|
#4
|
|
Goodbye, Sir. Thank You
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: MESA! :thud:
Posts: 24,385
|
Can we sticky this?
__________________
 dreamcastrocks--My Hero!!
|
|
|
February 1st, 2008, 06:49 PM
|
#5
|
|
I'm Coming for YOU!
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 45,145
|
This one shows how many are up for grabs in the upcoming states. California and NY are HUGE. Those states alone could put Hillary in the drivers seat.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epo...ate_count.html
|
|
|
February 1st, 2008, 07:43 PM
|
#6
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,108
|
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-t...aces_ti_1.html
Good article and comments there about the race tightening up in California.
If Barack and Hillary essentially split the delegates there, California will basically be a "push" and not decisive.
|
|
|
February 1st, 2008, 07:45 PM
|
#7
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,456
|
Vegas odds are usually right. Obama has no chance. Sorry kids.
|
|
|
February 1st, 2008, 07:55 PM
|
#8
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,108
|
http://www.dipdive.com/
David Broder, Washington Post, January 31, 2008:
In the past two weeks, there has been a remarkable shift of establishment opinion against [Hillary Clinton] and against the prospect of placing the party's 2008 chances in the hands of her husband, Bill Clinton.
The prominence of his role in New Hampshire and South Carolina, and the mean-spiritedness of his attacks on Obama, stunned many Democrats. Clinton's behavior underlined the warning raised in this column before Iowa, by a prominent veteran of the Clinton administration, that the prospect of two presidents both named Clinton sharing a single White House would be a huge problem for the Democrats in November if Hillary Clinton is the nominee.
The advantage has shifted back to Barack Obama -- thanks to a growing but largely unremarked-upon tendency among Democratic leaders to reject Hillary Clinton and her husband, the former president.
The New York senator could still emerge from the "Tsunami Tuesday" voting with the overall lead in delegates, but she is unlikely to come close to clinching the nomination. And the longer the race goes on, the better the chances Obama will prevail as more Democratic elected officials and candidates come to view him as the better bet to defeat McCain in November. The Clintons' negatives have brought much support to Obama, most notably that of Ted Kennedy, the most prestigious figure in the Democratic establishment in Washington. But it is also Obama's own appeal that is being talked about across the country, from Massachusetts to Arizona, by the younger generation of governors, senators and representatives who share with him an eagerness to "turn the page" on the battles of the past.
Obama is not inevitable, but the longer the race continues, the greater that hunger will be.
|
|
|
February 1st, 2008, 08:00 PM
|
#9
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,108
|
Major Newspaper Endorsements, CA and National papers
California
Los Angeles Times (1,231,318) -- Obama"has the edge in economic policy, less because of particular planks in his platform than because of his understanding that some liberal orthodoxies developed during the last 40 years have been overtaken by history."
San Francisco Chronicle (451,504) -- Obama "radiated the sense of possibility that has attracted the votes of independents and tapped into the idealism of young people during this campaign."
San Diego Union Tribune (408,392)
Orange County Register (354,632) -- Obama* "can inspire people to idealism with his speeches, and he talks about reaching across party lines to find pragmatic solutions."
Sacramento Bee (330,993) -- Obama "would be a fresh face with a new approach and no old scores to settle."
San Jose Mercury News (263,373) -- Obama "is the best choice to unify and inspire America."
Contra Costa Times (190,613) -- Obama "has a rare combination of youthful optimism and mature sagacity that have made him a national leader and one who would be the best choice for the Democratic presidential nomination."
Riverside Press Enterprise (189,000) -- Obama "brings an optimistic, positive presence to the campaign that offers welcome relief from the harsh partisanship of presidential politics."
Los Angeles Daily News (187,740) -- Obama "has the potential to break apart the old coalitions of American politics and create dynamic new ones in their place."
Fresno Bee (183,744) -- Obama** "is a co-sponsor of an agriculture guest-worker bill that would help assure that Valley farms get the workers they need to harvest crops."
La Opinion (128,553)
Nationwide
USA Today (2,528,437)
Wall Street Journal (2,058,342)
New York Times (1,683,855) -- Clinton "us[ed] her years in the Senate well to immerse herself in national security issues, and has won the respect of world leaders and many in the American military."
Los Angeles Times (1,231,318) -- Obama "offers leadership on education, technology policy and environmental protection unfettered by the positions of previous administrations."
Washington Post (960,684)
Chicago Tribune (957,212) -- Obama "tempered a progressive agenda with a cold dash of realism, often forging consensus with conservative Republicans when other liberals wanted to crusade."
New York Daily News (795,153)
Philadelphia Inquirer (705,965) -- Obama "has provided details of a White House program that, with adjustments, could produce the outcomes this nation needs."
|
|
|
February 2nd, 2008, 07:45 AM
|
#10
|
|
H.S.
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Aventine
Posts: 35,345
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by azsouthendzone
Vegas odds are usually right. Obama has no chance. Sorry kids.
|
Vegas odds are usually right about sports. I'm not so sure about politics.
|
|
|
February 4th, 2008, 05:03 PM
|
#11
|
|
Grey haired old Bird
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Sun City, AZ
Posts: 11,026
|
Thanks for the links. Whatever happens, it will be interesting.
|
|
|
February 5th, 2008, 04:21 AM
|
#12
|
|
Goodbye, Sir. Thank You
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: MESA! :thud:
Posts: 24,385
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Linderbee
Can we sticky this?
|

__________________
 dreamcastrocks--My Hero!!
|
|
|
February 5th, 2008, 08:08 AM
|
#13
|
|
Go Suns
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Phoenix az
Posts: 4,439
|
How many delegates does Arizona have?
__________________
10/18/2012 Bold Prediction
ASU beats Oregon
|
|
|
February 5th, 2008, 08:15 AM
|
#14
|
|
Chopped Liver Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 34,832
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by azsportsfan31
How many delegates does Arizona have?
|
56 pledged (from today's primary)
11 super delegates
67 total delegates
|
|
|
February 5th, 2008, 08:16 AM
|
#15
|
|
Goodbye, Sir. Thank You
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: MESA! :thud:
Posts: 24,385
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by azsportsfan31
How many delegates does Arizona have?
|
DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENTIAL:
Closed primary
67 total delegates*
56 tied to February 5 primary, 11 superdelegates
REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTIAL:
Closed primary
53 total delegates*
50 tied to February 5 primary, 3 unpledged RNC member delegates
__________________
 dreamcastrocks--My Hero!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Sitemap: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:57 AM.
|
|