Enjoy an Ads-Free ASFN - lighter and faster too! Become an ASFN-Contributor and help support the site.
Go Back   Arizona Sports Fans Network > Other Stuff > Politics and Religion > 2008 Presidential Election

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old February 22nd, 2008, 06:30 AM   #31
dreamcastrocks
Chopped Liver Moderator
 
dreamcastrocks's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 34,832
Quote:
Originally Posted by MigratingOsprey View Post
her closing was pretty good and I agree that her attacks ended up coming up very pety and obama did a very good job at focusing the debate on policy - pretty much setting the message of "you say i'm all words and no policy, here i am to discuss policy and you attack me over words?!"

hillary had a really good closing - however, why must she smirk through the whole debate? - beyond annoying - serious issues being discussed and she has to fight back a giggle?!
Watch the youtube above, she plagiarized it.
Enjoy an Ads-Free ASFN - lighter and faster too! Become an ASFN-Contributor and help support the site.
dreamcastrocks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 22nd, 2008, 06:30 AM   #32
abomb
Registered User
 

Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 21,836
How anyone can even consider voting for Hillary is beyond me.
abomb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 22nd, 2008, 06:53 AM   #33
MigratingOsprey
imploding
 
MigratingOsprey's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Goodyear
Posts: 8,039
damn -she even used some of the same hand motions - incredible, especially after her change by xerox commentary
__________________
"Memories and drinks don't mix too well"
MigratingOsprey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 22nd, 2008, 08:22 AM   #34
82CardsGrad
7 x 70
 
82CardsGrad's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Scottsdale
Posts: 19,742
My opinion... Obama is so much more likeable. Just that fact alone will most likely carry him past Clinton...
But, I believe that when they debate side by side on real issues like Heathcare and Foriegn Affairs - he comes off as sophomoric...
Doesn't mean that she would be more effective than he would be - in fact, I'm convinced she wouldn't be... However, it's clear in these settings who is the more polished, seasoned, "inside the beltway" politician. And again - that fact alone could be the demise of Billary...

I will also add that I find it just plain funny how both Obama and Clinton, as well as the other Dem. candidates before they exited, knew how to get a rise from the crowd... As long as they intersperse "George Bush" or "This Administration..." as frequently as possible into their commentary, they are sure to receive applause from the crowd...

The rhetoric is so tiring... I can't wait for the real debates to start...
82CardsGrad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 22nd, 2008, 08:27 AM   #35
Mulli
...
 
Mulli's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 44,458
Quote:
Originally Posted by 82CardsGrad View Post
My opinion... Obama is so much more likeable. Just that fact alone will most likely carry him past Clinton...
But, I believe that when they debate side by side on real issues like Heathcare and Foriegn Affairs - he comes off as sophomoric...
Doesn't mean that she would be more effective than he would be - in fact, I'm convinced she wouldn't be... However, it's clear in these settings who is the more polished, seasoned, "inside the beltway" politician. And again - that fact alone could be the demise of Billary...

I will also add that I find it just plain funny how both Obama and Clinton, as well as the other Dem. candidates before they exited, knew how to get a rise from the crowd... As long as they intersperse "George Bush" or "This Administration..." as frequently as possible into their commentary, they are sure to receive applause from the crowd...

The rhetoric is so tiring... I can't wait for the real debates to start...
The same rhetoric will get the same reaction in the "real" debates.
Mulli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 22nd, 2008, 08:33 AM   #36
Southpaw
Provocateur aka Wallyburger
 
Southpaw's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: via pacis
Posts: 27,663
Blog Entries: 9
America is falling for the " image ". They are buying the package. Very sad.

Get ready for 4 years of leadership about as effective as Jimmy Carter or Gerald Ford... unless Johnny Mac's bid gets him in.

DNC dropped the ball big time on this. The best candidates are gone.
__________________
"I read the news today, oh boy"
Southpaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 22nd, 2008, 08:37 AM   #37
Mulli
...
 
Mulli's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 44,458
Quote:
Originally Posted by wallyburger View Post
America is falling for the " image ". They are buying the package. Very sad.

Get ready for 4 years of leadership about as effective as Jimmy Carter or Gerald Ford... unless Johnny Mac's bid gets him in.

DNC dropped the ball big time on this. The best candidates are gone.
They bought Bill Clinton's image and he was better than those cats (arguably). I just can't see how you can equate Carter and Ford to Obama.
Mulli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 22nd, 2008, 08:39 AM   #38
Southpaw
Provocateur aka Wallyburger
 
Southpaw's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: via pacis
Posts: 27,663
Blog Entries: 9
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mulli View Post
They bought Bill Clinton's image and he was better than those cats (arguably). I just can't see how you can equate Carter and Ford to Obama.
Did you understand that statement? I wasn't speaking about the person or their images, I was talking about " not able to do anything " terms. If elected , Obama won't get Jack S. done.
__________________
"I read the news today, oh boy"
Southpaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 22nd, 2008, 08:41 AM   #39
MigratingOsprey
imploding
 
MigratingOsprey's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Goodyear
Posts: 8,039
I don't think obama is sophmoric in his responses - but he isn't as polished - to me he isn't rehearsed to the point, but actually is thinking about how to phrase his message

however, when his message is presented i think on a base level basis it's more to the point than clintons - when he was rebutting her claim about 15M uninsured he went into better detail with his plan, the failings of past efforts, why his plan would work and difficulties it would face - he just didn't present it super smoothly .......... clinton on the other hand was very smooth in the rhetoric that we will insure everyone and the only way you have a social mandate is if you make it mandatory - if not it wouldn't work using SS as an example ......... but she really didn't respond to the potential downfalls of the mandate that obama brought up
__________________
"Memories and drinks don't mix too well"
MigratingOsprey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 22nd, 2008, 08:41 AM   #40
MigratingOsprey
imploding
 
MigratingOsprey's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Goodyear
Posts: 8,039
Quote:
Originally Posted by wallyburger View Post
If elected , Obama won't get Jack S. done.
why?!
__________________
"Memories and drinks don't mix too well"
MigratingOsprey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 22nd, 2008, 08:50 AM   #41
D-Dogg
A Whole New World
 
D-Dogg's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On another planet
Posts: 40,799
Send a message via MSN to D-Dogg
Quote:
Originally Posted by wallyburger View Post
Did you understand that statement? I wasn't speaking about the person or their images, I was talking about " not able to do anything " terms. If elected , Obama won't get Jack S. done.
Why is that? He will have a democratic senate and house, more than likely. He'll be able to do a lot of what he wants.

Nothing stupid like National Health Care, one would hope, but a lot of his other good plans should get the mark of approval.
D-Dogg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 22nd, 2008, 08:55 AM   #42
Linderbee
Goodbye, Sir. Thank You
 
Linderbee's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: MESA! :thud:
Posts: 24,385
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mulli View Post
Guilty admission: First thing I said when I turned on the debate, "well her hair looks better." Sorry all, appearance on TV is a factor in these things.
I thought the exact same thing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dreamcastrocks View Post
Linder made the "well, at least her necklace isn't messed up" line.
Not during this debate...I just said that they get up from the table at the break to fix their make up & when else are they going to fix her necklace (referring to a much earlier debate in which her messed up necklace was bugging me & I commented on it)

Quote:
Originally Posted by 82CardsGrad View Post
My opinion... Obama is so much more likeable. Just that fact alone will most likely carry him past Clinton...
But, I believe that when they debate side by side on real issues like Heathcare and Foriegn Affairs - he comes off as sophomoric...
Doesn't mean that she would be more effective than he would be - in fact, I'm convinced she wouldn't be... However, it's clear in these settings who is the more polished, seasoned, "inside the beltway" politician. And again - that fact alone could be the demise of Billary...
I felt that Obama came off that way a little with regards to foreign affairs, but not so much that I felt he looked bad, just that Hillary had a better, more polished answer.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 82CardsGrad View Post
I will also add that I find it just plain funny how both Obama and Clinton, as well as the other Dem. candidates before they exited, knew how to get a rise from the crowd... As long as they intersperse "George Bush" or "This Administration..." as frequently as possible into their commentary, they are sure to receive applause from the crowd...

The rhetoric is so tiring... I can't wait for the real debates to start...
I got sick of how many times Hillary said, "George Bush". I don't blame him entirely for our pitfalls...I think "this administration" is a much more accurate term. I'd venture to say Hillary used both far more than Obama. She seems to be a "focus on the sins of the past so vote for me" type of candidate, whereas Obama is more "yes, the past sucked, let's change it for the future so vote for me" type of candidate. I prefer the latter, obviously.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MigratingOsprey View Post
I don't think obama is sophmoric in his responses - but he isn't as polished - to me he isn't rehearsed to the point, but actually is thinking about how to phrase his message
I was telling dcr last night that Hillary just sounds so rehearsed to me, where even though I've heard the same things out of Obama a lot now, it still sounds genuine. I don't mind that he's not as polished in the debates, or, doesn't SOUND as polished. I like that he thinks about what he's going to say, and then says it. I don't want canned, pre-planned answers that really just avoid the subject. I want to know what they're THINKING.
__________________
dreamcastrocks--My Hero!!
Linderbee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 22nd, 2008, 08:57 AM   #43
Linderbee
Goodbye, Sir. Thank You
 
Linderbee's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: MESA! :thud:
Posts: 24,385
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Donald View Post
Why is that? He will have a democratic senate and house, more than likely. He'll be able to do a lot of what he wants.

Nothing stupid like National Health Care, one would hope, but a lot of his other good plans should get the mark of approval.
and that's the "stupid" thing my family & I are really hoping gets done. Can't tell you how long it's been since I've been to the doctor. I haven't had my meds for my fibro in well over a year. National Health Care isn't stupid to everyone.
__________________
dreamcastrocks--My Hero!!
Linderbee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 22nd, 2008, 09:13 AM   #44
D-Dogg
A Whole New World
 
D-Dogg's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On another planet
Posts: 40,799
Send a message via MSN to D-Dogg
Quote:
Originally Posted by Linderbee View Post
and that's the "stupid" thing my family & I are really hoping gets done. Can't tell you how long it's been since I've been to the doctor. I haven't had my meds for my fibro in well over a year. National Health Care isn't stupid to everyone.
The fact that we can't afford both Social Security and Medicare as it is, makes government-provided Universal Health Care stupid.

There are better ways to fix health care than allowing the government to get involved and red-tape the f out of it, and simply push up our national bankruptcy from 3 decades to 1 or 2.

Last edited by D-Dogg; February 22nd, 2008 at 09:16 AM.
D-Dogg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 22nd, 2008, 09:24 AM   #45
MigratingOsprey
imploding
 
MigratingOsprey's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Goodyear
Posts: 8,039
i personally think it's a poor idea as well and one of my main sticking points

however, I have little confidence anyone will get it done so it's fallen down my priority lists

if one of the plans were to go through, i think obamas could be a little more palatable as it seems like there would be less ingrained bureaucracy and cost
__________________
"Memories and drinks don't mix too well"
MigratingOsprey is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Tags
john edwards, john kerry, ron paul

 
You may also search for:


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Sitemap:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:11 AM.



Subscribe in a reader
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007 - 2008, PixelFX Studios
Inactive Reminders By Icora Web Design