Welcome to ASFN Fan Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.
Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!
View Poll Results: How do you feel about the Bush Admin's Foreign Policy?
Great! weeded out fake-friends, in tight with real allies, & let the hostiles know we'll kick ass.
7
21.88%
Fine - we've kept our critical allies and stood up for US interests around the globe.
8
25.00%
Not thrilled - fewer friends and more enemies, and our global prestige and security seem weaker.
2
6.25%
Pretty much a disaster. We're a diplomatic bull in a china shop.
13
40.63%
Gee - Do we even have a foreign policy besides the war in Iraq?
1
3.13%
Who needs foreign policy?! Take care of the home front and screw the world!
So - CURRENT Administration's Foreign Policy - do you like it? hate it? proud of or embarrassed by it? ummm... can you describe it? find it? Buck stops where, in your opinion(s)? Anyone at the top impress you? Appall you?
Have at it, O ye polarized friends!
Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!
__________________ Hoping for Audacity
Well, in truth I'm actually not a total hawk, but I'm not a dove either -- I'm more like an angry pigeon flying over the political arena after a really big meal. -Abba Gav
Last edited by AZZenny; November 15th, 2005 at 09:26 PM.
hahaha
"US interests" - That usually means the interests of a few ultra rich movers and shakers - oh yeah - and cheaper bananas for the common folk.
The mind wash and propaganda victory of the elites over the public is to admired for its' effectiveness...
__________________
"Seachicken - it's what's for dinner" - me (until the 'Hawks sweep the Cards)
Every man has at least a bit of womanizer in him.
Check out Dephinger and Stoutpounder on our respective MySpace pages.
If the U.S. gets proactive - we're labeled the 'Global Police'...when things turn to crap...we're called in to be the 'Global Janitor' to clean up the mess.
If the U.S. gets proactive - we're labeled the 'Global Police'...when things turn to crap...we're called in to be the 'Global Janitor' to clean up the mess.
That's why I voted the 6th choice.
__________________
"Seachicken - it's what's for dinner" - me (until the 'Hawks sweep the Cards)
Every man has at least a bit of womanizer in him.
Check out Dephinger and Stoutpounder on our respective MySpace pages.
Our current foreign policy has ruined the support that we had for the war on Terror. After 9/11 pretty much every country in the world lined up to help fight the global war on terror. The countries of the world were united like never seen before.
Then the current adminstration decided to use 9/11 as an excuse to fight their own wars not realated to Terror. They alienated several of our allies and threw a monkey wrench in the global effort to fight terror.
IMO we should take care of the US first and stop being the world police. When other countries of the world need our help then yes we should be the first country there to support them in their time of need.
__________________ Give a person a fish and you feed them for a day; teach that person to use the Internet and they won't bother you for weeks.
__________________
"Seachicken - it's what's for dinner" - me (until the 'Hawks sweep the Cards)
Every man has at least a bit of womanizer in him.
Check out Dephinger and Stoutpounder on our respective MySpace pages.
When there is a major disaster like an earth-quake or a sunami, don't you think we should provide help? How is that being a Janitor? It's called being a good neighbor.
__________________ Give a person a fish and you feed them for a day; teach that person to use the Internet and they won't bother you for weeks.
Last edited by MadCardDisease; November 16th, 2005 at 03:56 PM.
yeah - I'd rather have my tax dollars help disaster victims than line the pockets of Dick and his friends
__________________
"Seachicken - it's what's for dinner" - me (until the 'Hawks sweep the Cards)
Every man has at least a bit of womanizer in him.
Check out Dephinger and Stoutpounder on our respective MySpace pages.
Anarchy:
1 a : absence of government b : a state of lawlessness or political disorder due to the absence of governmental authority c : a utopian society of individuals who enjoy complete freedom without government
2 a : absence or denial of any authority or established order b : absence of order : DISORDER
__________________
"Get your facts first, and then you can distort them as much as you please."
-Samuel Langhorne Clemens
1 a : absence of government b : a state of lawlessness or political disorder due to the absence of governmental authority c : a utopian society of individuals who enjoy complete freedom without government
2 a : absence or denial of any authority or established order b : absence of order : DISORDER
I don't think so. Where does he state he wants no Government in this statement:socially liberal, non-religious, ficsal conservative, semi-isolationist ?
Its the non-religious thing? Religion is supposed to seperate from Government, go reread the Bill of Rights. It is easily accessible.
__________________
"Let the rabbits wear glasses."
I don't think so. Where does he state he wants no Government in this statement:socially liberal, non-religious, ficsal conservative, semi-isolationist ?
Its the non-religious thing? Religion is supposed to seperate from Government, go reread the Bill of Rights. It is easily accessible.
Maybe you ought to go read the Bill of Rights thread.
Jeezzzsss, lighten up King! It was a friggen tounge-in-cheek statement. Notice the little blue smilie winkin' at you!!!
__________________
"Get your facts first, and then you can distort them as much as you please."
-Samuel Langhorne Clemens
Linear Mode
