My two cents:
Her exemption was fine - the whole purpose of an exemption is to allow someone who couldn't or didn't qualify a chance. These people are generally high profile. The argument that she's taking someone's spot is petty and stupid. It is true that sometimes a sponsor's exemption will use it to get into the top 125 (David Gossett, for instance), but you can't complain because ONE spot was used up in a way that will increase the earnings on the entire tour because of the publicity (and Annika is certainly going to increase the size of the pie for the men by playing).
Lorrie Kane had it right - she said that IF Annika plays GREAT, she MIGHT make the cut. The cold reality is that she will probably miss the cut by 10-15 strokes. She may even come in dead last.
How is she going to handle the thick rough and 470 yard par fours with fast, hard, greens and tough pin positions that she NEVER sees on the ladies tour?
John Smoltz said that he played a round with Tiger and Annika - and BEAT Annika (he didn't say by how much). If John Smoltz can beat Annika in the only round he plays with her (and she has no pressure), how is she going to beat the real pros in a pressure situation? She ISN'T. She'll shoot 80+ in at least one of those rounds. The person who said she might withdraw with an injury might have it right.
It takes guts for her to play with the guys, and I respect her for that. But this will only show how much better the guys are.
I remember when people said that Mia Hamm should play for the US mens soccer team. That is hilarious, because the truth is that a good, quick, all-star
high school player would dominate Mia Hamm or any other woman player. It isn't even the same game. Same in basketball, tennis, golf.
THe only sport women can compete with men in is pool. And they still aren't nearly as good.........