Welcome to ASFN Fan Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.
Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!
Has ASU Ever Reigned Supreme Over The PAC-10 At Anytime?
Ok just for willy nilly ASU fans.. Have you ever owned the PAC at any given time?
USC owns football and yes, baseball.. More titles than ASU in each..
UCLA owned the PAC for decades in basketball.. Then UofA came along to hold the torch for a few decades keeping the PAC in the national spotlight when no one wanted to or could..
As I was typing this, I now see why ASU fans have inferiority complex.. Always been good enuff just to be the brides maid but never the bride.. Im starting to pity you guys as I type this..
*a tear forms in Gee!'s eye*
Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!
__________________ I'm your favorite poster's, favorite poster
Defending the crown is harder than chasing it
Then UofA came along to hold the torch for a few decades keeping the PAC in the national spotlight when no one wanted to or could..
You must be kidding. The Pac-10 has had many teams keeping it in the spotlight. Quit acting like Arizona "carries" the entire conference in basketball.
You must be kidding. The Pac-10 has had many teams keeping it in the spotlight. Quit acting like Arizona "carries" the entire conference in basketball.
You didnt read my post did you? In the 80's and 90's UofA held the torch for PAC-10 in basketball.. Stanford had a couple good years, but nothing of the magnitude UofA had..
__________________ I'm your favorite poster's, favorite poster
Defending the crown is harder than chasing it
You didnt read my post did you? In the 80's and 90's UofA held the torch for PAC-10 in basketball.. Stanford had a couple good years, but nothing of the magnitude UofA had..
Still - are you kidding?
UCLA won a title in 1995.
Heck, in 1997 UofA was the Pac-10's 5th best team. UCLA made the Elite 8 and Stanford and Cal were in the Sweet 16.
Heck, in 1997 UofA was the Pac-10's 5th best team. UCLA made the Elite 8 and Stanford and Cal were in the Sweet 16.
Quit acting like UofA "carried" the Conference.
National Champions
1997
NCAA Tournament Final Four
1988, 1994, 1997, 2001
Pac-10 Conference Tournament Champions
1988, 1989, 1990, 2002
Pac-10 Conference Regular Season Champions
1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1993, 1994, 1998, 2000, 2003, 2005
As has been stated by Russ and others, the Pac-10 is what it is today because of Lute Olson and Arizona. Lute forced the rest of the PAC to step it up or face domination by the UofA. That's indisputable, even to the haters.
Pac-10 Conference Tournament Champions
1988, 1989, 1990, 2002
Pac-10 Conference Regular Season Champions
1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1993, 1994, 1998, 2000, 2003, 2005
As has been stated by Russ and others, the Pac-10 is what it is today because of Lute Olson and Arizona. Lute forced the rest of the PAC to step it up or face domination by the UofA. That's indisputable, even to the haters.
Looks like U of A finished first in the conference less than half the time in the 80's and 90's. I would have thought it was more.
For a guy who couldn't get into either school, you sure are big into the rivalry.
Well, that would have to mean I tried to get into one.. I will say this.. I wasnt trying to get into ASU but they sure did make me feel at home once upon at time.. And thats all Imma say about that..
__________________ I'm your favorite poster's, favorite poster
Defending the crown is harder than chasing it
Looks like U of A finished first in the conference less than half the time in the 80's and 90's. I would have thought it was more.
Exactly - which was my point. Gee's making it sound like the whole conference was carried by one team. The conference was 5, 6, or even 7 teams deep most years. In 1997 5 teams made the NCAA's and two more made the NIT.
UofA, like 'em or not, was up and down. One year a Final Four and the next a first round exit. They did not carry the conference. They were helped by playing in a tough conference.
Exactly - which was my point. Gee's making it sound like the whole conference was carried by one team. The conference was 5, 6, or even 7 teams deep most years. In 1997 5 teams made the NCAA's and two more made the NIT.
UofA, like 'em or not, was up and down. One year a Final Four and the next a first round exit. They did not carry the conference. They were helped by playing in a tough conference.
ASU wouldnt have the Swoosh on thier jersys if it wasnt for UofA.. Like it or not, you owe the Wildcats for that..
__________________ I'm your favorite poster's, favorite poster
Defending the crown is harder than chasing it
"Well I've been completely obliterated on the other point I was trying to make over and over, so I guess Ill talk about shoe companies"
Go ahead and live in your own world buddy.. Just like I was denied from both ASU and UofA.. If you cant see what Im talking bout as far as the Swoosh, well, you must think the world thinks Arizona as a state is first and foremost known for college football..
__________________ I'm your favorite poster's, favorite poster
Defending the crown is harder than chasing it
Tetris Champion!
Linear Mode
