Welcome to ASFN Fan Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.
Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!
Leave it to 82 to defend (yes, concidering you are the ONLY one here that is making your argument, that is what you are doing) Dana, but throw personal insults at posters.
"defend"?? Uh - Ok KloD... If accusing me of defending makes you feel as though you have made whatever point it is you are attempting to make, go for it buddy!
"personal insults"?? I commended the guy for tossing out a super-terrific idea! Geeesh!
Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!
So, because she didn't know about the Cuban Missile Crisis, this means she does not possess a "basic understanding" of U.S. History??
Interesting...
As spokeswomen representing the Office of the Presidency of the United States of America - a knowledge of our history should not only be an expectation but a requirement as well.
The reporter asked a relevant question in which she had no clue about. Its not like a reporter asked her to compare/contrast the Boxer Rebellion with the dissidents in Tibet.
She failed to establish that she has a "basic understanding" of U.S. History.
As spokeswomen representing the Office of the Presidency of the United States of America - a knowledge of our history should not only be an expectation but a requirement as well.
The reporter asked a relevant question in which she had no clue about. Its not like a reporter asked her to compare/contrast the Boxer Rebellion with the dissidents in Tibet.
She failed to establish that she has a "basic understanding" of U.S. History.
I get that Jughead... As I've said, I am not attempting to defend the woman. How she made it to the point she is at in life, and seems to not know of the Bay of Pigs is surprising... However, I think it's a stretch to suggest that because she appeared to not possess knowledge of this specific matter, that she somehow does not possess a "basic understanding" of U.S. History...
I get that Jughead... As I've said, I am not attempting to defend the woman. How she made it to the point she is at in life, and seems to not know of the Bay of Pigs is surprising... However, I think it's a stretch to suggest that because she appeared to not possess knowledge of this specific matter, that she somehow does not possess a "basic understanding" of U.S. History...
Sorry It wasn't my suggestion - it was something she created.
So far Perino has proven that she does not have a "basic understanding" of American history.