|
|
Welcome to ASFN Fan Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.
Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!
|
|
July 3rd, 2003, 08:45 AM
|
#136
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 541
A$FN: 50
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Krangthebrain
I don't understand how you don't see the difference.
Men with men, two adults consenting.
Men with boys, one adult with a child.
|
I understand the difference just fine. I never said I consent or agree with NAMBLA's claims. Frankly, the organization makes me hurl and I believe they should be shut down. What I am pointing out is that they make the same claims homosexuals do. They claim that the man/boy love they promote is natural.
NAMBLA claims that everything is acceptable as long as the boy consents.
So why do homosexuals get to make certain claims and fight for certain rights but not NAMBLA?
|
|
|
|
Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!
|
|
|
|
July 3rd, 2003, 08:48 AM
|
#137
|
|
Jolly Nihilist
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Old Town Scottsdale
Posts: 6,858
A$FN: 1,240
|
strongbad
... even a weirdo like me knows that there is validity in protecting children. I can't even LOOK at high school girls anymore, not even college girls... ok, maybe grad students...
Behavior between 2 adult homos is.... ADULT.
Why do right wingers always play the "slippery slope" card? It's a bogus argument
|
|
|
July 3rd, 2003, 08:52 AM
|
#138
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 541
A$FN: 50
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Krangthebrain
I can't wait until Science proves that homosexuality is biologically based. Right wingers won't have a leg to stand on. Every gay person I know, will say that they didn't choose to be gay, and I would think you would agree with that Jon.
|
I am glad you admit that science hasn't proven that homosexuality yet. Frankly, from what I read on some of the AOL boards, right wing christians seem to already have an acceptable answer if science ever does prove homosexuality to be biological.
Krang, what do you think your homosexual friends will say if science proves one's sexuality is not biologically pretermined? Do you really think their choice of sexual partners will change?
|
|
|
July 3rd, 2003, 08:57 AM
|
#139
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 541
A$FN: 50
|
Re: strongbad
Quote:
Originally posted by andikrist
... even a weirdo like me knows that there is validity in protecting children. I can't even LOOK at high school girls anymore, not even college girls... ok, maybe grad students...
Behavior between 2 adult homos is.... ADULT.
Why do right wingers always play the "slippery slope" card? It's a bogus argument
|
And again, I am not a right winger. All I did is show people that there is other organizations out there that make the same claims as homosexuals have.
I believe if the pattern of our culture continues it is only a matter of time before organizations such as NAMBLA become acceptable and legal. Most likely it will be when we are all long gone and buried, but the future can be predicted by looking at the past.
What were people saying about homosexuality 50 years ago?
|
|
|
July 3rd, 2003, 09:01 AM
|
#140
|
|
Random Encounter
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Chandler
Posts: 24,136
A$FN: 49,214
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Strong Bad
I understand the difference just fine. I never said I consent or agree with NAMBLA's claims. Frankly, the organization makes me hurl and I believe they should be shut down. What I am pointing out is that they make the same claims homosexuals do. They claim that the man/boy love they promote is natural.
NAMBLA claims that everything is acceptable as long as the boy consents.
So why do homosexuals get to make certain claims and fight for certain rights but not NAMBLA?
|
If a groups claims that human sacrifice is natural, does that make it right?
You are trying to compare apples and oranges. Consenting Adults vs non-consent.
Children do not have the mental reasoning to consent.
IF you can't tell the difference between gays and Nambla, there is no use in discussing this.
__________________
R.I.P Tim Minnick
The KING of Cards
|
|
|
July 3rd, 2003, 09:16 AM
|
#141
|
|
Keep ya' pimp hand tight
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Griesheim, Germany
Posts: 11,781
A$FN: 10,490
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Dback Jon
If a groups claims that human sacrifice is natural, does that make it right?
You are trying to compare apples and oranges. Consenting Adults vs non-consent.
Children do not have the mental reasoning to consent.
IF you can't tell the difference between gays and Nambla, there is no use in discussing this.
|
Exactly.
__________________
26-year-old Saermengsi last season rated average 25.1 minutes, with 7.5 hours, 2.7 times and 2.7 backboard secondary attack, he Yifusen general as the replacement came in March Yifusen injuries ever period of time, three matches in a row, his secondary attack will reach 10. By Sun team, he could strengthen outer lane line, but also as the replacement fullback scored his general customary activities in the stadium two wings. On the season Saermengsi-ball hit rate reached 30%. He was in flames and Jones made a three-year teammate, Jones said that the organizers he pitches, but he can also shooting. His shooting is deceptive.
|
|
|
July 3rd, 2003, 09:17 AM
|
#142
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 541
A$FN: 50
|
Jon, NAMBLA does not accept non-consenting boys. Read their mtaerial and you will see that they talk about consenting adults with consenting boys.
Quote:
We condemn sexual abuse and all forms of coercion. Freely-chosen relationships differ from unwanted sex. Present laws, which focus only on the age of the participants, ignore the quality of their relationships. We know that differences in age do not preclude mutual, loving interaction between persons. NAMBLA is strongly opposed to age-of-consent laws and all other restrictions which deny men and boys the full enjoyment of their bodies and control over their own lives.
NAMBLA does not provide encouragement, referrals or assistance for people seeking sexual contacts.
NAMBLA does not engage in any activities that violate the law, nor do we advocate that anyone else should do so.
|
If you refuse to see the similarities with what homosexuals went through 50 or so years ago and with what NAMBLA is going through today you are willfully being ignorant. Actually NAMBLA is far ahead of the homosexuals way back in the 1950s because of what homosexuals went through.
Just as there are many different groups of christians (using an example that you mentioned) there are also many different groups of sexual preference. Who's to say NAMBLA's claims are not as valid as the homosexual claims?
Last edited by Strong Bad; July 3rd, 2003 at 09:22 AM.
|
|
|
July 3rd, 2003, 09:19 AM
|
#143
|
|
Keep ya' pimp hand tight
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Griesheim, Germany
Posts: 11,781
A$FN: 10,490
|
Re: Re: strongbad
Quote:
Originally posted by Strong Bad
And again, I am not a right winger. All I did is show people that there is other organizations out there that make the same claims as homosexuals have.
I believe if the pattern of our culture continues it is only a matter of time before organizations such as NAMBLA become acceptable and legal. Most likely it will be when we are all long gone and buried, but the future can be predicted by looking at the past.
What were people saying about homosexuality 50 years ago?
|
Nope. It isn't a matter of time before Nambla becomes legal. No reasonable person believes that men with boys is ok. For a group with twisted beliefs like NAMBLA to become legitimate, the Supreme Court would have to rule that it is alright for men to be with boys. Not going to happen in a thousand years, and it is illogical and unreasonable to think so.
__________________
26-year-old Saermengsi last season rated average 25.1 minutes, with 7.5 hours, 2.7 times and 2.7 backboard secondary attack, he Yifusen general as the replacement came in March Yifusen injuries ever period of time, three matches in a row, his secondary attack will reach 10. By Sun team, he could strengthen outer lane line, but also as the replacement fullback scored his general customary activities in the stadium two wings. On the season Saermengsi-ball hit rate reached 30%. He was in flames and Jones made a three-year teammate, Jones said that the organizers he pitches, but he can also shooting. His shooting is deceptive.
|
|
|
July 3rd, 2003, 09:20 AM
|
#144
|
|
Keep ya' pimp hand tight
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Griesheim, Germany
Posts: 11,781
A$FN: 10,490
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Strong Bad
Jon, NAMBLA does not accept non-consenting boys. Read their mtaerial and you will see that they talk about consenting adults with consenting boys.
If you refuse to see the similarities with what homosexuals went through 50 or so years ago and with what NAMBLA is going through today you are willfully being ignorant.
|
Children, under the law and in the belief of 99% of all adults, are not able to consent.
__________________
26-year-old Saermengsi last season rated average 25.1 minutes, with 7.5 hours, 2.7 times and 2.7 backboard secondary attack, he Yifusen general as the replacement came in March Yifusen injuries ever period of time, three matches in a row, his secondary attack will reach 10. By Sun team, he could strengthen outer lane line, but also as the replacement fullback scored his general customary activities in the stadium two wings. On the season Saermengsi-ball hit rate reached 30%. He was in flames and Jones made a three-year teammate, Jones said that the organizers he pitches, but he can also shooting. His shooting is deceptive.
|
|
|
July 3rd, 2003, 09:22 AM
|
#145
|
|
Keep ya' pimp hand tight
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Griesheim, Germany
Posts: 11,781
A$FN: 10,490
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Strong Bad
I am glad you admit that science hasn't proven that homosexuality yet. Frankly, from what I read on some of the AOL boards, right wing christians seem to already have an acceptable answer if science ever does prove homosexuality to be biological.
Krang, what do you think your homosexual friends will say if science proves one's sexuality is not biologically pretermined? Do you really think their choice of sexual partners will change?
|
The preponderence of evidence so far, shows that it is reasonable to assume that homosexuality is biological, not a choice. Most Scientist generally regard it as such.
Strongbad, do you actually believe someone would choose to be homosexual? As a hetero, you've heard all the jokes about homosexuals, and seen the torment that hetero males put homosexuals through. Do you want to believe that anyone would choose that?
__________________
26-year-old Saermengsi last season rated average 25.1 minutes, with 7.5 hours, 2.7 times and 2.7 backboard secondary attack, he Yifusen general as the replacement came in March Yifusen injuries ever period of time, three matches in a row, his secondary attack will reach 10. By Sun team, he could strengthen outer lane line, but also as the replacement fullback scored his general customary activities in the stadium two wings. On the season Saermengsi-ball hit rate reached 30%. He was in flames and Jones made a three-year teammate, Jones said that the organizers he pitches, but he can also shooting. His shooting is deceptive.
|
|
|
July 3rd, 2003, 09:26 AM
|
#146
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 541
A$FN: 50
|
Re: Re: Re: strongbad
Quote:
Originally posted by Krangthebrain
Nope. It isn't a matter of time before Nambla becomes legal. No reasonable person believes that men with boys is ok. For a group with twisted beliefs like NAMBLA to become legitimate, the Supreme Court would have to rule that it is alright for men to be with boys. Not going to happen in a thousand years, and it is illogical and unreasonable to think so.
|
I think the Supreme Court just overturned some laws regarding the illegal act of homosexuality.
None of us can predict the future 100% accurately, but the similarities between the homosexual movement 50-60 years ago and the NAMBLA movement of today are very similar.
You state that boys cannot give consent. Why? Because the law says so. Laws of this country are made by people and people's attitude changes over time. Abortion, homosexuality and more have all seen a legal and cultural change in the past 50 years. What makes you think the people will not change their thinking on NAMBLA?
|
|
|
July 3rd, 2003, 09:33 AM
|
#147
|
|
Keep ya' pimp hand tight
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Griesheim, Germany
Posts: 11,781
A$FN: 10,490
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: strongbad
Quote:
Originally posted by Strong Bad
I think the Supreme Court just overturned some laws regarding the illegal act of homosexuality.
None of us can predict the future 100% accurately, but the similarities between the homosexual movement 50-60 years ago and the NAMBLA movement of today are very similar.
You state that boys cannot give consent. Why? Because the law says so. Laws of this country are made by people and people's attitude changes over time. Abortion, homosexuality and more have all seen a legal and cultural change in the past 50 years. What makes you think the people will not change their thinking on NAMBLA?
|
But homosexuality is sex between two consenting ADULTS.
That (ADULT) is the key word Strongbad, not the consenting part. As Jon said, you are comparing apples and oranges.
Children are sacred. Maybe you just don't get it, or you are being extremely stubborn, trying to prove a point that does not exist.
__________________
26-year-old Saermengsi last season rated average 25.1 minutes, with 7.5 hours, 2.7 times and 2.7 backboard secondary attack, he Yifusen general as the replacement came in March Yifusen injuries ever period of time, three matches in a row, his secondary attack will reach 10. By Sun team, he could strengthen outer lane line, but also as the replacement fullback scored his general customary activities in the stadium two wings. On the season Saermengsi-ball hit rate reached 30%. He was in flames and Jones made a three-year teammate, Jones said that the organizers he pitches, but he can also shooting. His shooting is deceptive.
|
|
|
July 3rd, 2003, 09:39 AM
|
#148
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 541
A$FN: 50
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Krangthebrain
The preponderence of evidence so far, shows that it is reasonable to assume that homosexuality is biological, not a choice. Most Scientist generally regard it as such.
Strongbad, do you actually believe someone would choose to be homosexual? As a hetero, you've heard all the jokes about homosexuals, and seen the torment that hetero males put homosexuals through. Do you want to believe that anyone would choose that?
|
Are we going to have another scientific evolution discussion? I love it when science uses the terms assumption, reasonable and preponderence of evidence so far. In reality all that means is that they don't know and their belief is based on an educated guess system.
I also said that I have seen some answers from the religious right wingers that give a reasonable conclusion of non-participation if homosexuality is ever proven to be biological.
Krang, your concept that homosexuality has to be biological based on what homosexuals have endured is anything but scientific. Humans have gone through a lot for just about everything. Let's use your arguments on another we discussed at length. There are scientists who do not believe in evolution. I am sure you've heard and even passed on jokes about those scientists as they have been continually ridiculed, made fun of and even tormented as evokutionary media have pointed them out and defamed their good names ... do you want to believe they would choose that?
|
|
|
July 3rd, 2003, 09:41 AM
|
#149
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 541
A$FN: 50
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: strongbad
Quote:
Originally posted by Krangthebrain
But homosexuality is sex between two consenting ADULTS.
That (ADULT) is the key word Strongbad, not the consenting part. As Jon said, you are comparing apples and oranges.
Children are sacred. Maybe you just don't get it, or you are being extremely stubborn, trying to prove a point that does not exist.
|
Actually, homosexuality is sexual activity between members of the same gender. You are including the ADULT part in your definition because it satisfies YOUR sense of morality. A point homosexuals made regarding their sexual preference a number of years ago.
Of course I am comparing apples to oranges. Your only problem is that they are still fruit. Homosexuality and NAMBLA both claim to be natural and acceptable when all parties involved are consenting. Homosexuality and NAMBLA may be different but they are still sexual preferences.
|
|
|
July 3rd, 2003, 11:30 AM
|
#150
|
|
Jolly Nihilist
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Old Town Scottsdale
Posts: 6,858
A$FN: 1,240
|
strong bad...
ok - i still maintain that consenting adults have the right of free association. Freaking NAMBLA, pedophile priests, bad stepfathers - get a boot in the face from me.
You draw a line in one location, i draw a line a little farther - but i still draw a line...
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Sitemap: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 |