Enjoy an Ads-Free ASFN - lighter and faster too! Become an ASFN-Contributor and help support the site.
Go Back   Arizona Sports Fans Network > Other Stuff > Politics and Religion

Welcome to ASFN Fan Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.


Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old January 2nd, 2007, 06:01 AM   #1
40yearfan
Takin' a bite outa the Niners
 
40yearfan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Buckeye, AZ.
Posts: 24,194
A$FN: 7,001

So much for bi-partisanship


Democrats To Start Without GOP Input
Quick Passage of First Bills Sought

By Lyndsey Layton and Juliet Eilperin
Washington Post Staff Writers
Tuesday, January 2, 2007; Page A01

As they prepare to take control of Congress this week and face up to campaign pledges to restore bipartisanship and openness, Democrats are planning to largely sideline Republicans from the first burst of lawmaking.

House Democrats intend to pass a raft of popular measures as part of their well-publicized plan for the first 100 hours. They include tightening ethics rules for lawmakers, raising the minimum wage, allowing more research on stem cells and cutting interest rates on student loans.

But instead of allowing Republicans to fully participate in deliberations, as promised after the Democratic victory in the Nov. 7 midterm elections, Democrats now say they will use House rules to prevent the opposition from offering alternative measures, assuring speedy passage of the bills and allowing their party to trumpet early victories.

Nancy Pelosi, the Californian who will become House speaker, and Steny H. Hoyer of Maryland, who will become majority leader, finalized the strategy over the holiday recess in a flurry of conference calls and meetings with other party leaders. A few Democrats, worried that the party would be criticized for reneging on an important pledge, argued unsuccessfully that they should grant the Republicans greater latitude when the Congress convenes on Thursday.

The episode illustrates the dilemma facing the new party in power. The Democrats must demonstrate that they can break legislative gridlock and govern after 12 years in the minority, while honoring their pledge to make the 110th Congress a civil era in which Democrats and Republicans work together to solve the nation's problems. Yet in attempting to pass laws key to their prospects for winning reelection and expanding their majority, the Democrats may have to resort to some of the same tough tactics Republicans used the past several years.

Democratic leaders say they are torn between giving Republicans a say in legislation and shutting them out to prevent them from derailing Democratic bills.

"There is a going to be a tension there," said Rep. Chris Van Hollen (Md.), the new chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. "My sense is there's going to be a testing period to gauge to what extent the Republicans want to join us in a constructive effort or whether they intend to be disruptive. It's going to be a work in progress."

House Republicans have begun to complain that Democrats are backing away from their promise to work cooperatively. They are working on their own strategy for the first 100 hours, and part of it is built on the idea that they might be able to break the Democrats' slender majority by wooing away some conservative Democrats.

Democrats intend to introduce their first bills within hours of taking the oath of office on Thursday. The first legislation will focus on the behavior of lawmakers, banning travel on corporate jets and gifts from lobbyists and requiring lawmakers to attach their names to special spending directives and to certify that such earmarks would not financially benefit the lawmaker or the lawmaker's spouse. That bill is aimed at bringing legislative transparency that Democrats said was lacking under Republican rule.

Democratic leaders said they are not going to allow Republican input into the ethics package and other early legislation, because several of the bills have already been debated and dissected, including the proposal to raise the minimum wage, which passed the House Appropriations Committee in the 109th Congress, said Brendan Daly, a spokesman for Pelosi.

"We've talked about these things for more than a year," he said. "The members and the public know what we're voting on. So in the first 100 hours, we're going to pass these bills."

But because the details of the Democratic proposals have not been released, some language could be new. Daly said Democrats are still committed to sharing power with the minority down the line. "The test is not the first 100 hours," he said. "The test is the first six months or the first year. We will do what we promised to do."
Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!
40yearfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 2nd, 2007, 06:26 AM   #2
Divide Et Impera
Registered User
 

Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Maricopa, AZ
Posts: 8,605
A$FN: 2,740
Quote:
House Democrats intend to pass a raft of popular measures as part of their well-publicized plan for the first 100 hours. They include tightening ethics rules for lawmakers, raising the minimum wage, allowing more research on stem cells and cutting interest rates on student loans.
All these things they wish to pass are contrary to the current GOP "leadership". If the Dems want to uphold their commitments to their constituents and to the American people based on the platform they were voted in on, they have to get these acts through....

Where's your outrage over Bush's lack of partisanship with regards to Iraq in spite of the opposition from the American public, the Iraq report, the growing resistance politically (even from his own party) and the newly released commentary from Ford?

It seems to me you are nitpicking the tiny details while enabling egregious mistakes to go unchecked....
Divide Et Impera is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 2nd, 2007, 07:54 AM   #3
40yearfan
Takin' a bite outa the Niners
 
40yearfan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Buckeye, AZ.
Posts: 24,194
A$FN: 7,001
Quote:
Originally Posted by Divide Et Impera View Post
All these things they wish to pass are contrary to the current GOP "leadership". If the Dems want to uphold their commitments to their constituents and to the American people based on the platform they were voted in on, they have to get these acts through....

Where's your outrage over Bush's lack of partisanship with regards to Iraq in spite of the opposition from the American public, the Iraq report, the growing resistance politically (even from his own party) and the newly released commentary from Ford?

It seems to me you are nitpicking the tiny details while enabling egregious mistakes to go unchecked....

There was no opposition during the initial phases, only after the Demos changed their minds. They voted to give the president the authority to start the war so they were in on the original part.

What the Demos are proposing is exactly opposite of what they stated during the election process. Why don't you address that issue?

I'm not surprised by this as it is a life long pattern.
40yearfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 2nd, 2007, 08:00 AM   #4
Divide Et Impera
Registered User
 

Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Maricopa, AZ
Posts: 8,605
A$FN: 2,740
They are doing the things they promised to get the votes. They are going to enact the laws that were the basis of their platform. They are doing exactly what they stated during the election process. They are not, however, going to let their promises be roadblocked. There's time for partisanship on other things. With regards to their campaign promises, they need to get those through and the GOP would only serve to be a roadblock to those initiatives that the American people voted for. The American voice is more important than the GOP voice. This is a representative democracy....
Divide Et Impera is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 2nd, 2007, 08:09 AM   #5
40yearfan
Takin' a bite outa the Niners
 
40yearfan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Buckeye, AZ.
Posts: 24,194
A$FN: 7,001
Quote:
Originally Posted by Divide Et Impera View Post
They are doing the things they promised to get the votes. They are going to enact the laws that were the basis of their platform. They are doing exactly what they stated during the election process. They are not, however, going to let their promises be roadblocked. There's time for partisanship on other things. With regards to their campaign promises, they need to get those through and the GOP would only serve to be a roadblock to those initiatives that the American people voted for. The American voice is more important than the GOP voice. This is a representative democracy....

So you are saying the Demos weren't roadblocks to the conservative agenda?

We were promised a bipartisian Congress by the Demos during the election period. They have already renigged on that and no amount of double speak will change that. It is simply the arrogant liberal attitude that their agenda is not to be questioned, only accepted. Same thing they accused the Repubs of. The more things change, the more they stay the same.
40yearfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 2nd, 2007, 08:35 AM   #6
Divide Et Impera
Registered User
 

Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Maricopa, AZ
Posts: 8,605
A$FN: 2,740
How convenient for you to feign indignation now....
Divide Et Impera is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 2nd, 2007, 09:37 AM   #7
40yearfan
Takin' a bite outa the Niners
 
40yearfan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Buckeye, AZ.
Posts: 24,194
A$FN: 7,001
Indignation? Nope. Just pointing out that no matter which party is in power, they will act the same.
40yearfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 2nd, 2007, 01:24 PM   #8
RedStorm
*** CENSORED ***
 
RedStorm's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2002
Location: Gilbert
Posts: 6,348
A$FN: 7,895
Quote:
Originally Posted by 40yearfan View Post
Indignation? Nope. Just pointing out that no matter which party is in power, they will act the same.
Hey 40...Don't burst DEI or any other liberal Demo bubble too soon with the truth.
__________________
The greatest lies are told before a marriage, after a hunt and during an election - Count Bismark
RedStorm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 2nd, 2007, 07:44 PM   #9
conraddobler
I want my 2$
 
conraddobler's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,344
A$FN: 800
Quote:
Originally Posted by 40yearfan View Post
Indignation? Nope. Just pointing out that no matter which party is in power, they will act the same.
Imagine that a politician lying... go figure.



Just a suggestion 40, next time muzzle the nutjobs in your party, they scare us independents so that we all herd up and vote for the other guys.

Then maybe you wouldn't be suffering this indignation in the first place.
__________________
At what point then is the approach of danger to be expected? I answer, if it ever reach us, it must spring up amongst us. It cannot come from abroad. If destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher. As a nation of freemen, we must live through all time, or die by suicide.

~Abraham Lincoln Lyceum Address
conraddobler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 2nd, 2007, 09:14 PM   #10
40yearfan
Takin' a bite outa the Niners
 
40yearfan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Buckeye, AZ.
Posts: 24,194
A$FN: 7,001
Quote:
Originally Posted by conraddobler View Post
Imagine that a politician lying... go figure.



Just a suggestion 40, next time muzzle the nutjobs in your party, they scare us independents so that we all herd up and vote for the other guys.

Then maybe you wouldn't be suffering this indignation in the first place.
They are no worse than the nutjobs in the Demo party (Dean, Gore). As I said, I am not indignant. Just enjoying pointing the finger at the party in power.
40yearfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 2nd, 2007, 11:22 PM   #11
arthurracoon
The Cardinal Smiles
 
arthurracoon's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Tucson/PHX AZ
Posts: 15,415
A$FN: 12,500
Quote:
Originally Posted by 40yearfan View Post
As I said, I am not indignant. Just enjoying pointing the finger at the party in power.
__________________
Signed,

arthurpostpadder

arthurracoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
nancy pelosi


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Sitemap:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:34 PM.



Subscribe in a reader
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007 - 2008, PixelFX Studios
Copyright © 2002 - 2006 ArizonaSportsFans.com
Inactive Reminders By Icora Web Design