I love this part, which we all have known for awhile, but it still bothers me:
"NASA's shuttle team knew about the foam strike shortly after launch, but presumed the light material could not pierce the tough carbon panels that protect the wings. "
Man, we do space walks without any effort these days, and NO ONE at NASA suggested anyone go take a look at the place the foam hit?
I love this part, which we all have known for awhile, but it still bothers me:
"NASA's shuttle team knew about the foam strike shortly after launch, but presumed the light material could not pierce the tough carbon panels that protect the wings. "
Man, we do space walks without any effort these days, and NO ONE at NASA suggested anyone go take a look at the place the foam hit?
Just baffles me...
Mike
There was a guy I used to work with that used to work at NASA. After the Shuttle explosion, he brought in a piece of the heat shield that he took when he left NASA.
I was shocked that the heat shield tiles are only about half of an inch thick! He said that if the under-belly of the Shuttle were missing a piece the size that he had (about one square inch) it would cause the same kind of tragedy.
__________________ Moses parted the Red Sea, Oppenheimer split the atom, but dotKen cut the crap. - Steve Antczak
On the news last night was a guy from NASA that wanted to ask another agency to take a look with telescopes or satellites while the shuttle was in orbit. The guy's name was Roca I think. NASA decided there was no danger.
Sounds to me like there wasn't much they could do and had a little wishful thinking.
I didn't get the whole story. It was only a teaser for the hour long program on either NBC or ABC.