Rivercard

So Russ, got any inside scoop on this?

--------------------------------------------------------

Salmon fishing closed for California, Oregon
John Koopman, Chronicle Staff Writer

SAN FRANCISCO -- No commercial or recreational salmon fishing will be allowed off the coast of California and most of Oregon this year.

The Pacific Fishery Management Council voted Thursday to cancel the chinook fishing season in an effort to reverse the catastrophic disappearance of California's fabled run of the pink fish popularly known as king salmon.

"I think it's probably the right thing to do," said Barbara Emley, 64, who has run a commercial fishing boat with her husband out of Fisherman's Wharf since 1985.

"It's tough, though. We're going to lose our (fishing) community. People are going to have to figure out what to do with five months of no income."

Just hours after the vote, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger declared a state of emergency and sent a letter to President Bush asking for his help in obtaining federal disaster assistance. In addition, the governor's office announced that Schwarzenegger will sign legislation to appropriate about $5.3 million for coastal salmon and steelhead fishery restoration projects.

"California's salmon runs are a treasured state resource and provide significant contributions to our economy and our environment," Schwarzenegger said. "Today's decision by the Pacific Fishery Management Council underscores our responsibility to quickly free up state and federal resources to help the fishing industry cope with the devastating economic impacts closing the season will have.

The Pacific Fishery Management Council, meeting in SeaTac, Wash., considered a variety of options for saving the salmon because too few fall-run chinook came back to spawn in the Sacramento River and its tributaries in autumn.

Fishing ban the only option
In the end, it decided the only option was to halt fishing throughout the salmon habitat all along the California and Oregon coasts, the first time that's happened since the federal agency was created 22 years ago to manage the Pacific Coast fishery. Its management plan required it because of the low numbers of salmon and only an emergency ruling by Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez could change the requirement, and that, according to fisheries experts, is unlikely.

The council's recommendation will be forwarded to the National Marine Fisheries Service for approval by May 1.

"This is a disaster for West Coast salmon fisheries, under any standard," said council Chairman Don Hansen. "There will be a huge impact on the people who fish for a living, those who eat wild-caught king salmon, those who enjoy recreational fishing, and the businesses and coastal communities dependent on these fisheries."

The commercial salmon season off California and Oregon typically span from May 1 to Oct. 31. The recreational season was to have begun on April 5, but was delayed until the council made its decision.

The council canceled the seasons after the fall run in the Sacramento River and its tributaries saw the number of spawning fish drop from more than 800,000 just six years ago to slightly more than 68,000 last year. Experts are predicting that a little more than 50,000 fish will be in the river this autumn.

The Sacramento fall spawning season was the last great salmon run along the giant Central Valley river system, including the San Joaquin River, and nobody knows for sure what has caused the precipitous decline of the chinook salmon. The National Marine Fisheries Service has pointed to a sudden lack of nutrient-rich deep ocean upwellings caused by ocean temperature changes as a possible cause. But most biologists say it is a combination of factors, including agricultural pollution, water diversions from the delta and damaged habitat.

"The reason for the sudden decline of Sacramento River fish is a mystery at this time," said council Executive Director Don McIsaac. "The only thing that can be done in the short term is to cut back the commercial and recreational fishing seasons to protect the remaining fish. The longer-term solution will involve a wide variety of people, agencies, and organizations. But for now, unfortunately, those involved in the salmon fisheries are paying the price."

Millions in losses
If the ban holds, it would mean the loss of $20.7 million that commercial and recreational salmon fishing brings into the California economy each year. The 400 or so commercial fishermen in the state stand to lose 70 to 80 percent of their annual incomes.

Losses in Oregon would top $9 million. At least 1,000 fishermen troll the waters for king salmon between Santa Barbara to Washington state.

Zeke Grader, executive director of the Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations, said he was disappointed that the decision had to be made, but he doesn't fault the council.

"We're trying to get a disaster declaration to get (fishermen) through this and get them some money until things can be turned around," he said.

The next step, he said, is to get the commercial fishermen actively involved in the decision-making process for addressing water issues in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta.

"We've really got our work cut out for us," he said. "We knew there were problems, but this year they really came home to roost."

Tina Swanson, senior scientist at the Bay Institute and a fish biologist, said problems in either the ocean or the river system can disrupt the salmon population, but problems in both areas can be catastrophic. And that is essentially what has happened, she said.

"We can't do anything about conditions in the ocean," she said, "but we can control what goes on in the river. We need to do a better job of management to protect the salmon habitat.

"This isn't something that happened in just one year. It's been going on for some time."

Meanwhile, the people who fish for a living and those who do it recreationally will not be the only ones to feel the effects of the ban. Consumers will be hurt, as well.

Salmon in fancy restaurants will likely go for around $40 a portion, about twice the normal price.

Michael Weller, executive chef with the California Culinary Academy in San Francisco, said salmon is so popular among consumers that they will continue to buy the fish at markets, even if the price rises substantially.

At restaurants, however, Weller predicted that chefs will not replace wild salmon with the less-tasty farm-raised variety. Instead, he said, consumers will most likely see greater choices of striped bass or halibut.

The price fishermen get for their catch has gone up from about $1.75 a pound three years ago to about $5.50 a pound, but to most anglers, the situation isn't about money anymore. It's about survival of a species.

Salmon off-limits
The problem: Record low numbers of salmon returning from the ocean to the Sacramento River.

What happened? The Pacific Fishery Management Council voted for a ban on commercial and sport chinook fishing off the coast of California and most of Oregon.

What's next? The council's recommendation is expected to be approved by the National Marine Fisheries Service by May 1.

Russ Smith

I don't salmon fish but I have read quite a bit about this. There's a bunch of potential reasons for it from global warming making the ocean too warm to predation by other fish species. But you ask anybody who's been around salmon fishing for years and they'll tell you it's the same thing that caused the decline of the delta smelt which led to them shutting off the pumps in the Delta earlier this year that I mentioned several months back.

The combination of diversion of water to Southern California, and agriculture, is killing the salmon runs. Runoff from agriculture leads to very high levels of pollutants that kill the salmon smolt, and the water diversion leads to lots of smolts being sucked through the pumps. I know this is true because I know guys who've caught salmon in San Luis Reservoir, it's a man made lake South of the Delta that gets all its' water from the Delta, people fish there for striped bass but there have been several accidental catches of salmon in recent years which proves the smolt are getting sucked through the pumps and apparently some survive and get bigger in San Luis.


There's a hatchery program to plant salmon but for years it's been the biggest joke around, they're finally bowing to pressure and changing it. They'd take all the smolt and release them in the same places every year, it got to where everyone including the predatory fish knew when and where.

So they'd unload these trucks and dump the fish into the water and people swear you could literally see the wave of striped bass hanging out waiting for the smolt to eat. Then beyond that would be the wave of boats lining up to catch the striped bass. There were numerous proposals to change the releases, to make it illegal to fish near there during a release etc but they finally changed it this year so they're going to put them in pens, take them out into current and let them get acclimated and then slowly release them which will hopefully increase the numbers that survive. But again these are hatchery fish it's the decline of the native fish that's the big scare.

There's a front page article in my paper today about the Stagnaro family who've been fishing commercially out of Santa Cruz for like 100 years. They have a restaurant and shop on the SC Pier, they take people out fishing etc. They are actually in danger of bankruptcy due to the closure they're trying to survive until tuna season by doing whale watching and eco tours with their fishing boats.

the main thing is the whole reason the Delta Smelt crisis was so important is they were the canary in the coal mine they were the fish that signalled something is SERIOUSLY wrong in the Delta. Striped bass numbers are declining too and now we know the salmon are in steep decline.

__________________
"This space available"

Gaddabout

Russ is right. It's no secret at all.

__________________
Local commentary, sugar-free!
the desert gadabout

Dback Jon

Damn scare tactics environmentalists causing humans jobs. Humans should have the right to catch as many salmon as they want. No fish should cost a human a job. This decision is saying that fish are more important than humans...











(NOTE: Posted so others won't have to make this argument).

__________________



R.I.P Tim Minnick

The KING of Cards

Russ Smith

Well the Stagnaros are pretty clear they don't want to catch the last salmon and nobody they know does either. The problem is this is a case where it's really not the commercial fishing or sport fishing that's the problem. It's not helping of course although most of the hatchery fish are paid for by fishing license money, but the problem here is the spawing habitats of these fish are decimated because of the damage in the Delta. now the ocean is apparently too warm for them in certain places so they're getting hit on both ends of their life cycle.

There are definitely humans to blame too. There's a story in the paper right now about this incredibly rich guy who just got indicted for poaching Steelhead. Apparently on his ranch house in Gilroy there's a stream that runs through it that has a small population of native steelhead. DFG employees noticed it and were paying attention because the guy was diverting water from the stream for use on his land(illegally). At some point they discovered quite a few fish that were obstructed from getting upstream because of the dam this guy had put in his property. They did the correct paperwork to go in and order the guy to take down the dam but when they got there, the fish were gone, and there were "signs of poaching including fishing rods and lines with hooks."

The guy keeps saying look I'm rich, I can afford to charter a jet and fly to Idaho if I want to go trout fishing, why the hell would I poach Steelhead? But the DFG has brought charges against him they're endangers and he's facing federal charges. If he's guilty I hope they nail him good.

The reality is that for well over 100 years all these fish survived side by side and thrived, it wasn't until man started diverting water and dumping agricultural runoff into the Delta that fish pops. started to decline. The "experts" keep talking about predatory non native fish destroying the salmon runs but it's complete BS it's the water not the fish that are the problem.

__________________
"This space available"