Welcome to ASFN Fan Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.
Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!
Republican Fundraisers On Wall St Shy Away From Bush
.
Quote:
Wall Street's enthusiasm for US President George W. Bush appears to have cooled as the presidential race tightens and concerns grow about foreign policy and fiscal deficits.
Some leading fundraisers of Mr Bush's re-election bid have stopped active campaigning and others privately voice reservations.
The New York financial community is expected to give the Republicans a lavish welcome when the president's party arrives for its national convention next week. Wall Street has been a big contributor to Mr Bush's record-breaking re-election fund. But one senior Wall Street figure, once talked of as a possible Bush cabinet member, said that he and other prominent Republicans had been raising money with increasing reluctance. “Many are doing so with a heavy heart and some not at all.” He cited foreign policy and the ballooning federal deficit as Wall Street Republicans' main concerns.
A Republican in the financial services industry concurs. “Many of them may be maxed out,” he said, referring to campaign contributions that have hit the legal ceiling, “but they are backing away from Bush.”
The deficit has been criticised by Peter Peterson, chairman and co-founder of Blackstone Group, the New York investment firm, and former commerce secretary under President Richard Nixon. In his new book, Running on Empty, he accuses both parties of recklessness but attacks the Republican leadership for a “new level of fiscal irresponsibility”.
One New York dinner in June 2003 raised more than $4m, partly thanks to the efforts of Stan O'Neal, chief executive of Merrill Lynch. Yet Mr O'Neal has done no fundraising for the campaign at all since then and friends say he is not supporting Mr Bush. “He is best described as independent,” said one. Another senior Wall Street figure, who has given money to the campaign, said he was among many Wall Street bosses who were impressed with Mr Bush's handling of the September 11 attacks. “But since then, I have lost faith over foreign policy and tax,” he said.
Even those who are campaigning for Mr Bush sound increasingly defensive. “Whether or not you like him, you can't change leaders during a war,” said the head of one Wall Street firm.
We get the FT at the office (it is printed on orangeish paper). I guess since it is based in London, you could draw some conclusions about it "leaning". This whole deficit situation will ending up being a problem, at some point, if there is not serious attention paid to it. Thus, Wall Streets concern really shouldn't be all that surprising.
The deficit has been criticised by Peter Peterson, chairman and co-founder of Blackstone Group, the New York investment firm, and former commerce secretary under President Richard Nixon. In his new book, Running on Empty, he accuses both parties of recklessness but attacks the Republican leadership for a “new level of fiscal irresponsibility”.
Wall Street should be getting nervous. The more the government borrows the more the cost of money goes up. Inflation increases which acts as a kind of regressive tax.
Of course all this is tempered with the possibility of Kerry spending more. Which is not completely unlikely.
__________________
“votes are collared under democracy, not by talking sense but by talking nonsense.” ~H. L. Mencken
I don't think the GOP will lose control of congress, so maybe if Kerry were elected his spending would be held in check some.
It almost seems unreal that he would spend more than Bush already has. Of course if the economy continues to show improvement they will probably raise spending accordingly.
It wont make ant difference anyway. I think Kerry wants to cut the deficit in half in 5 years or something. Maybe one of Kerry's ASFN campain managers can correct me on that.
It is a nice gesture but the amount of money this government spends is obscene. I really wonder how long it can keep these commitments it has undertaken.
__________________
“votes are collared under democracy, not by talking sense but by talking nonsense.” ~H. L. Mencken
It almost seems unreal that he would spend more than Bush already has.
Agreed, that's not going to happen if the GOP controls Congress. In fact, if Kerry wins and the GOP controls Congress, I think budget bashing may come back into vouge.
Last edited by WizardOfAz; September 2nd, 2004 at 11:25 AM.
Linear Mode
