Welcome to ASFN Fan Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.
Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!
Toggle Bonds - Yet Another High Wire Act While doing some research on "toggle bonds" and “covenant light” deals, I came across an article in the GlobeAndMail called Private Equity's High-Wire Act that describes both nicely. This following excerpt is further proof of just how insane credit lending has become.
Behind the veneer of the self-congratulation, jaw-dropping riches and plain excess – witness Blackstone Group chief Steve Schwarzman, who made $400-million last year and hired Rod Stewart to perform at his 60th birthday party – the first cracks are beginning to appear. Some private equity players say too many deals are getting done at prices that are too high; on average, buyouts firms in the U.S. are paying roughly 50 per cent more for assets than they were in 2001.
The bidding wars are great for shareholders of public companies, but afterward, they also leave those businesses encumbered with far too much debt, much of it borrowed under looser terms than ever. Some of the biggest buyout deals of the past few years – Freescale Semiconductor in the U.S., Masonite International in Canada – are already showing some financial strain.
Today, a few bankers have publicly voiced concern about foolish lending, among them Bank of America chief executive officer Ken Lewis, who recently got the attention of the world's banks when he said: “We are close to a time when we'll look back and say we did some stupid things.”
In the U.S., banks hold just 20 per cent of “leveraged loans,” a term that describes not just buyout loans but other junk debt, according the Standard & Poor's.
The other 80 per cent is held by institutional investors – hedge funds, mutual funds, pensions, insurance companies and so on. The biggest buyers are financial engineers who acquire a bunch of loans, pool them together as collateralized loan obligations, or CLOs, and sell them off in pieces – very often to those same hedge, mutual and pension funds.
CLOs didn't exist during the big buyout wave of the late 1980s, and they didn't become “dominant” buyers of high-risk loans until 2002 and 2003, says Steven Miller, who analyzes the speculative loan market for S&P. While they've been a haven for the banks as a place to easily offload speculative loans, the presence of CLOs creates a longer daisy chain – middlemen upon middlemen – dividing those loans up into ever-smaller slices.
The result is that the banks, now acting more as loan brokers, are less vigilant about the kinds of loans they arrange, since they know that they likely won't be holding the loan for long.
Does this sound familiar? It should – because it's similar to the way the U.S. subprime mortgage operated during its high-growth years. Mortgage brokers, scurrying to sign up clients as quickly as they could, were lax in weeding out customers with poor credit. When those borrowers began to default in large numbers, the usual buyers for subprime debt quit purchasing it, and those left holding billions in poor-quality loans – companies like New Century Financial – went broke, out of business, or swallowed their losses.
The fees for arranging loans are as alluring for the commercial banks as they were for subprime lenders.
“It's like crack cocaine for them,” says the unnamed private equity partner. In LBO deals, “the banks don't care any more about the [quality of] credit. As long as they can sell it all, they're fine.”
Large private equity firms know this and are taking advantage. The heated competition for their business means not only cheap money, but easy terms.
So-called “covenant light” deals, such as Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co.'s $26-billion takeover of First Data, remove many of the usual conditions attached to loans; borrowers aren't required to keep their debt below 6 times their annual EBITDA, for example, or to ensure that their interest payments consume no more than half of their cash flow. (EBITDA is earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization.)
The idea is to “make it harder for the banks to find a default that would allow them to call the loan,” says Jay Swartz, a lawyer at Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP who works on private equity transactions. How many big LBOs are being done covenant light? When it comes to deals by KKR, Blackstone Group and other large private equity shops, “virtually all” are done this way now, confesses a New York-based banker for a large Canadian financial institution.
Three years ago, U.S. firms taken over in LBOs had free cash flow that equalled 2.6 times their interest expense - so if the business took a dive and cash flow fell by half, they could still make their payments. That's no longer the case. The cash-flow coverage ratio has shrunk to 1.7 times, according the S&P's Mr. Miller, the lowest level since the bull market of the late 1990s.
These are the subprime borrowers of the corporate world, and they, too, have their own inventions for making a heavy debt load a little bit easier. The housing industry had adjustable-rate mortgages; Wall Street has "toggle bonds," which allow the borrower to choose to pay interest by issuing more bonds, paying even higher interest, instead of cash.
Toggle bonds are not a totally new concept, but they tend to be issued only in exuberant times. They have proven to be dangerous in an economic downturn.
It's easy to understand why a company would want to sell a toggle bond, but harder to reckon the appeal for those buying them. Who wants to lend money to a company that's so strapped for dough, it can't even pay its interest in cash?
The reasons are simple. Many hedge funds use borrowed money themselves to amplify returns. So all they need to do is find some debt that's yielding, say, 10 per cent, buy a lot of it with money they've borrowed at 7 or 8 per cent, and collect a healthy spread - and fat fees - in between.
And if that strategy explodes in their faces because they end up holding some worthless junk debt? So be it. For as long as it lasts, it's an easy route to profits. Hedge funds get into trouble and are forced to close shop all the time, but no one ever asks them to return their fees (generally 2 per cent plus 20 per cent of the investing profits).
"Why would you not just take the highest possible risk with other people's money? If there's literally no downside, it's the rational thing for you to do," says Mr. Fridson.
The history of such lowly debt like that is not very encouraging; usually, more than one-third of it goes into default within the first three years. It's not a question of whether a large LBO implodes, but when it will happen and who will be left holding the bag.
It's no secret there have been relatively few defaults on even the junkiest of junk so far this year. The reason is simple: companies that would (and should) have been wiped off the face of the earth by default were given a lease on life by investors willing to refinance that debt on insanely favorable terms to the debtors, regardless of risk.
“The process feeds on itself until the patient dies”
The speculative action in LBOs, junk financed buybacks, and toggle bonds is indeed quite like that of junkies hooked on crack cocaine. It's fitting that the words junk and dealers both apply. The only difference is this high comes from debt leverage instead of cocaine. And why not pile on the risk and shoot for the stars with as much leverage as possible? After all it's OPM (other people's money) being bet. In both cases the next fix takes more and more leverage to generate the same high. And in both cases the process feeds on itself until the patient dies. But before this all blows up, enormous fees are generated for the dealers, in this case investment bankers and hedge funds.
Fantasy Land for Corporate Treasurers
The Standard discusses toggle bonds in Junk bonds spark jitters.
"Defaults are almost non-existent today and, well, we know that doesn't hold forever," said Thomas Lee, who stepped down last year from Thomas H Lee Partners, the Boston-based takeover firm he founded 32 years ago.
"When the economy goes bad, defaults will spike up from 1 percent into the 9 percent level," Lee said at the Milken Institute Global Conference in Los Angeles last month. "If that happens then the financing part grinds to a halt" for LBOs, he said. More than half of the junk bonds sold this year were used to pay for leveraged buyouts and mergers and acquisitions, notes Barclays Capital.
Money is so easy to come by that for the first time some investors agreed to let borrowers choose to make interest payments in cash or in additional bonds. "This is fantasy land for corporate treasurers," said Edward Altman, a professor of finance at New York University's Stern School of Business.
The growth of toggle bonds is a symptom of too-easy credit, Fridson said. Giving companies the ability to pay interest with more debt rather than cash shows they "have a reasonable likelihood of needing to exercise that option," he said.
Companies are piling on debt even as the economy slows. Total debt for about 300 companies rated BB and B rose by 16 percent last year, double its growth in 2005, according to Fitch.
Ford Motor lost US$282 million in the first quarter and is US$23 billion deeper in debt than it was a year ago. The Dearborn, Michigan-based company's US$3.7 billion of 7.45 percent bonds due in 2031 trade at a yield premium of 4.63 percentage points, down from 5.38 a year ago, according to Trace, the bond-price reporting system of the NASD. Ford is rated Caa1 by Moody's.
More than US$108 billion of so- called covenant-lite loans, or those that do not hold borrowers to limits on quarterly debt, have been completed this year, compared with a total of US$36 billion in the previous 10 years, according to S&P's LCD.
"The normal thing is two to four years after the issuance for defaults," said NYU's Altman. "Deals with little covenants, toggles, push back the timeline. But it's gotta happen."
Note that as Ford went $23 billion deeper in debt the presumed risk of default dropped given that spreads fell by 75 basis points.
Postponing the Day of Reckoning
Investment News describes toggle bonds and distressed debt in general the situation in Returns on distressed debt piquing investor interest.
Distressed debt can be risky, but that hasn’t stopped investors from turning to it in search of extra yield, industry observers say. Returns on distressed debt — junk bonds with a very high likelihood of default — were a strong 11.4% in the first quarter, outstripping all other asset classes, according to a recent report from Standard & Poor’s in New York.
But there isn’t a lot of distressed debt available for those investors who hope to jump on the bandwagon, said David Keisman, an analyst at Moody’s Investors Service in New York.
There is so much liquidity in the market right now that financing is easy to come by, he said. Companies that normally would have found themselves in default have been able to refinance their debt, Mr. Keisman added.
But are these “rescues” permanent or are defaults merely being pushed off for a later date? That is a distinction Mr. Keisman said is impossible to determine until it is too late. “No one is forecasting much of a default rate in 2007,” he said.
There have been 10 sales of toggle bonds this year, totaling $5.14 billion — a record, according to S&P.
The effect of toggle bonds, as well as some of the rescue financing, however, will be to push off junk bond defaults to a later date, said Martin Fridson, chief executive of FridsonVision LLC, a New York high-yield research firm.
Junk bonds — and distressed debt, in particular — will continue to win fans, because it is hard to predict what the catalyst might be for a rise in defaults, said Rick Fulmer, a Denver-based vice president and bond trader with D.A. Davidson & Co. of Great Falls, Mont.
Because spreads between high-yield bonds and U.S. Treasuries are much tighter than normal, investors have to take on more risk for less reward. But the economy still is strong, and companies still are able to pay off their debt, Mr. Fulmer said.
The Catalyst
Here's an interesting sentence from the above article: "It is hard to predict what the catalyst might be for a rise in defaults."
I strongly disagree. The catalyst is easy to predict (even if the timing itself is difficult). It will be a sudden change in risk tolerances of hedge funds, investors, and/or others to do these deals.
I talked about sudden changes in sentiment in Consumer Sentiment Wanes as Housing Slumps.
Flashback Summer 2005
Floridians were camping out overnight in lines to buy Florida condos. Prices were soaring. Did prices start falling or did the pool of fools willing to buy Florida condos at increasingly absurd prices dry up first?
Flash Forward Summer 2007
Will stock prices drop first or will the pool of fools willing to finance increasingly absurd leveraged buyout deals and debt financed stock buybacks dry up first?
In 2005 the conventional wisdom was that it would take much higher interest rates to sink housing. Conventional wisdom was wrong: the catalyst was a sudden and sustained change in the willingness of fools to invest in Florida houses . In short: the pool of greater fools simply dried up.
Whether it's housing, leveraged buyouts, toggle bonds, distressed debt in general, or stock prices, it will be a change in appetite for risk that leads the charge.
With that thought in mind let's turn or focus on the question: "But are these 'rescues' permanent or are defaults merely being pushed off for a later date? That is a distinction [that] is impossible to determine until it is too late."
Too Late Already
I suggest that it is possible to determine whether or not it's too late. Furthermore I suggest that it's already too late.
Flashback December 13 2005: It's Too Late. This is what I wrote:
I think it's too late.
In fact I know it's too late.
How do I know?
The following Email I received tonight should explain it nicely.
When you see stuff like this, not only is it too late, it's way too late.
Just and there was too much housing and subprime garbage in 2005 to be unwound, there is now too many toxic CDOs, toxic CLOs, toxic toggle bonds, toxic LBOs, and simply too much toxic stuff in general to be unwound. And when the unwinding attempt really gets going (it has now barely started) there simply will not be any bids for most of this toxic garbage. Want proof? Just ask Bear Stearns. The debacle at Bear Stearns is but a drop in the bucket for what's to come.
These things die by fear, there is no fear now, fear is healthy and it keeps us from doing stupid things, the absence of any fear is what causes the greatest mistakes ever made.
When all forms of loans go bad the concept of risk is reintroduced and when it takes hold you can't pry money out of lenders hands, when the money stops the music stops too.
The sad thing is not just the greedy will pay, we'll all pay dearly for years, the loss of faith in the system will drag us down for years and years, but we'll have great stories to tell our grandchildren.
Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!
__________________
At what point then is the approach of danger to be expected? I answer, if it ever reach us, it must spring up amongst us. It cannot come from abroad. If destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher. As a nation of freemen, we must live through all time, or die by suicide.
~Abraham Lincoln Lyceum Address
Last edited by conraddobler; June 25th, 2007 at 10:28 AM.
Even more of just what you have been saying all along....
Quote:
Breaking News from MoneyNews.com
Bank of International Settlements:
Credit Boom May Spark Depression
The Bank of International Settlements (BIS) is warning that the global economy could be on the brink of a major depression similar to the one that occurred in the 1930s.
The BIS said that years of loose monetary policy have fueled a dangerous credit bubble leaving the global economy more vulnerable to an economic catastrophe than is generally understood.
In its 77th Annual Report for the financial year April 1, 2006-March 31, 2007 that was submitted to the BIS’ annual general meeting held in Basel on June 24, the BIS — which one source described as "the ultimate bank of central bankers" — noted that the Great Depression that began in 1929 caught many off guard and unprepared.
"Virtually nobody foresaw the Great Depression of the 1930s, or the crises which affected Japan and southeast Asia in the early and late 1990s. In fact, each downturn was preceded by a period of non-inflationary growth exuberant enough to lead many commentators to suggest that a 'new era' had arrived," said the bank.
Several worrying signs, including mass issuance of new types of credit instruments, soaring levels of household debt, extreme appetite for risk shown by investors and entrenched imbalances in the world currency system, have all made the Bank wary the global economy is at serious risk.
The BIS pointed to China as a possible spark that could cause a sudden global downturn.
The BIS said "China may have repeated the disastrous errors made by Japan in the 1980s when Tokyo let rip with excess liquidity." "The Chinese economy seems to be demonstrating very similar, disquieting symptoms," the BIS claimed, noting China's credit and asset boom.
[Editor's Note: 2007: Year of Financial Reckoning?]
The Bank described China's booming economy as "unstable, unbalanced, uncoordinated and unsustainable" — a comment apparently made by Chinese premier Wen Jiabao.
The BIS also took a swipe at the U.S. Federal Reserve, noting that the central bank was rethinking the easy credit policies of former Fed chief Alan Greenspan.
The BIS was not sanguine about the dollar, citing America's huge trade and deficit imbalances with U.S. external liabilities growing to over $4 trillion from 2001 to 2005.
"The dollar clearly remains vulnerable to a sudden loss of private sector confidence," the BIS report stated.
Worrisome too is the bubble created by private equity deals and hedge fund activity.
"Sooner or later the credit cycle will turn and default rates will begin to rise," the BIS said.
"The levels of leverage employed in private equity transactions have raised questions about their longer-term sustainability. The strategy depends on the availability of cheap funding,"
The warnings of the BIS should not come as a surprise to readers of MoneyNews.com. While we are not predicting a 1930's style depression, we have warned that a global credit boom has put that global economy in jeapordy.
Again, this is from an email, so no link, but this is from the cheerleaders again. When the cheerleaders stop rooting for the team....
The Saudis control most of the U S money. The Royal family, can you say dictators, know that some day their own people will take them down. They are happy to keep that money in U S. British and Swiss banks for safekeeping, so they lend it back to us. The Chinese are in the same position. So far, so good. Guess the U S military might is good for something.
__________________
In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way.
Franklin D. Roosevelt
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." --Voltaire
Last edited by wallyburger; June 26th, 2007 at 08:50 AM.
The Saudis control most of the U S money. The Royal family, can you say dictators, know that some day there own people will take them down. They are happy to keep that money in U S. British and Swiss banks for safekeeping, so they lend it back to us. The Chinese are in the same position. So far, so good. Guess the U S military might is good for something.
They're all already done with it.
They won't just kill us overnight but they have to save themselves too, after all it's just pieces of paper.
Watch the 10 year bond rate soar, that means people no want no more worthless paper, they're done.
__________________
At what point then is the approach of danger to be expected? I answer, if it ever reach us, it must spring up amongst us. It cannot come from abroad. If destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher. As a nation of freemen, we must live through all time, or die by suicide.
Even more of just what you have been saying all along....
Again, this is from an email, so no link, but this is from the cheerleaders again. When the cheerleaders stop rooting for the team....
In the past before people were able to study case history of this stuff it snuck up more, but there is no denying you can see it.
The only question will be how it's dealt with, you can have a depression that lasts about a year and it'll clear out the pipes and everyone moves on, or you can try and avoid it and make it a way of life for 15 years, we'll see I guess.
__________________
At what point then is the approach of danger to be expected? I answer, if it ever reach us, it must spring up amongst us. It cannot come from abroad. If destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher. As a nation of freemen, we must live through all time, or die by suicide.
They won't just kill us overnight but they have to save themselves too, after all it's just pieces of paper.
Watch the 10 year bond rate soar, that means people no want no more worthless paper, they're done.
... and the faith in the bond rate means they expect the US dollar to be strong enough to pay off that bond, or the rate is high because dollar is devalued. ???????
__________________
In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way.
Franklin D. Roosevelt
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." --Voltaire
Conrad is proving to be prophetic, while certain *other* numerically named posters are proving themselves pathetic....
Careful he's going to be in here talking up the DOW rocketing ahead on news of the worst home price delcines in 16 years.
Take a look at the DOW, the stock market opened higher, got the news, fell then powered higher.
This is classic volatility that may continue all the way until the fall, greed dies hard and only loses out to fear.
There is something about winter comming I think that makes the reality hit in October, that's a good bet for when the last Bull dies.
__________________
At what point then is the approach of danger to be expected? I answer, if it ever reach us, it must spring up amongst us. It cannot come from abroad. If destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher. As a nation of freemen, we must live through all time, or die by suicide.
... and the faith in the bond rate means they expect the US dollar to be strong enough to pay off that bond, or the rate is high because dollar is devalued. ???????
When the Bond price falls the yield rises, falling bonds means investors just don't want to hold them and demand higher returns to do so, their higher returns are higher mortgage rates for all of us.
__________________
At what point then is the approach of danger to be expected? I answer, if it ever reach us, it must spring up amongst us. It cannot come from abroad. If destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher. As a nation of freemen, we must live through all time, or die by suicide.
When the Bond price falls the yield rises, falling bonds means investors just don't want to hold them and demand higher returns to do so, their higher returns are higher mortgage rates for all of us.
So if the yield is high enough, the bonds won't be dumped?????Now the burden is on the american taxpayer to buy back the bonds in the future at a higher rate???? Oh boy.
__________________
In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way.
Franklin D. Roosevelt
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." --Voltaire
So if the yield is high enough, the bonds won't be dumped?????Now the burden is on the american taxpayer to buy back the bonds in the future at a higher rate???? Oh boy.
Well it's actually worse than that, the debt is financed with this stuff, the line item for interest could double easily.
In fact it probably will, not to mention destroy the housing market, wasteland style.
This actually props up the $ and makes those Saudis happy.
We need x Billions of $ per day to fund our shortfalls, if the world is tired of giving us money then we've got to pay more for it and in a global credit crunch, it's not just a little more, it's an INSANE amount more.
Picture easy times at low rates, double the rates and turn that smile upside down and watch people start shooting themselves.
__________________
At what point then is the approach of danger to be expected? I answer, if it ever reach us, it must spring up amongst us. It cannot come from abroad. If destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher. As a nation of freemen, we must live through all time, or die by suicide.
~Abraham Lincoln Lyceum Address
Last edited by conraddobler; June 26th, 2007 at 09:05 AM.
Well it's actually worse than that, the debt is financed with this stuff, the line item for interest could double easily.
In fact it probably will, not to mention destroy the housing market, wasteland style.
This actually props up the $ and makes those Saudis happy.
We need x Billions of $ per day to fund our shortfalls, if the world is tired of giving us money then we've got to pay more for it and in a global credit crunch, it's not just a little more, it's an INSANE amount more.
Picture easy times at low rates, double the rates and turn that smile upside down and watch people start shooting themselves.
Got any idea how it affects my " I Bonds "???
Maybe I should hedge and invest in Chesebrough-Pond's, Inc.
__________________
In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way.
Franklin D. Roosevelt
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." --Voltaire
Last edited by wallyburger; September 26th, 2008 at 08:16 AM.
I've seen applications like this one before, wildly successful pillar of the community, above reproach but upon looking at the numbers they look like a financial turd, debt to the eyeballs, barely 10$ left over to eat with but drives a killer new car, big house, kids have the best clothes.
Contrast that with a guy who looks rough but has no debt and has 250,000 in a 401k account but the other guy would laugh at the financially responsible guys truck.
__________________
At what point then is the approach of danger to be expected? I answer, if it ever reach us, it must spring up amongst us. It cannot come from abroad. If destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher. As a nation of freemen, we must live through all time, or die by suicide.
I normally wouldn't listen to a thing this guy says, in fact I read the whole thing to tear it apart, it apears he wrote a decent article for once and I don't see any major holes in it, on top of that he explained it in a very easy to understand manner which isn't as easy to do as it looks.
During the height of the real estate bubble, I wrote a column saying that the crash was coming and suggested selling any piece of real estate that was overpriced, questionable, or non-performing. As expected, I received angry replies.
Today, I'm predicting the next crash, what I believe will cause it, and why it'll be a severe blow to the global economy. The signs are already here.
Busts Beat Booms
First of all, it's no big deal to predict booms and busts. All markets boom and bust. It's just easier to predict a bust because the signs are so obvious -- like excess euphoria, easy access to money, huge profits, and scores of happy amateurs entering the market.
Booms are harder to predict. They start silently, like oak acorns buried in the ground -- you don't notice them until they're towering trees. For example, few people recognized Microsoft or Google for the giants they were until after they'd become major players and the big profits had been made.
Paradoxically, that means busts are better because we can see them coming. This gives us time to prepare, and makes it easier to capitalize on them.
The Year the Dollar Died
The coming bust started in 1971. That was the year Richard Nixon took the United States off the gold standard, thus converting the U.S. dollar from money to currency -- that is, from an asset to a liability, and an instrument of debt. That was the year the dollar died.
After Nixon was forced out of office, the U.S. economy went into a slump under presidents Ford and Carter. We had high inflation and low growth, otherwise known as "stagflation," before Ronald Reagan and his dedication to supply-side economics -- Reganonomics -- came along.
Reagan cut taxes and started borrowing money, increasing the national debt. As a nation and as a people, we began borrowing and spending to spur the economy. And the economy boomed until 2000.
A World of Debt
It began to sink after 9/11. We lowered interest rates and began printing more money. In 2003 and 2004, the Bank of Japan created 35 trillion yen to save the dollar and their economy. It was l
