Enjoy an Ads-Free ASFN - lighter and faster too! Become an ASFN-Contributor and help support the site.
Go Back   Arizona Sports Fans Network > Other Stuff > Politics and Religion

Welcome to ASFN Fan Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.


Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old February 17th, 2005, 09:35 PM   #1
nidan
The Terminator
 
nidan's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2002
Location: Scottsdale
Posts: 15,312
A$FN: 12,489

Frontline - Rumsfeld's War


If you get the chance everybody should watch this on PBS. It's aired this week and is probably repeating.

No this is not liberal GW bashing, watch and we can talk about it. You won't be wasting your time.
Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!
__________________


DogTv
nidan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 17th, 2005, 10:36 PM   #2
nathan
Moderator
 

Join Date: May 2002
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 4,546
A$FN: 23,950
I watched it Tuesday night. It's amazing that he and Wolfowitz thought they knew better than the generals what kind of troop numbers would be necessary.
__________________
sponsored by black
nathan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 18th, 2005, 04:31 AM   #3
wallyburger
Agent Provocateur
 
wallyburger's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: via pacis
Posts: 17,856
A$FN: 15,000
For a synopsis see;

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/pentagon/
__________________
In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way.

Franklin D. Roosevelt

"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities."

--Voltaire
wallyburger is online now   Reply With Quote
Old February 18th, 2005, 09:17 AM   #4
nidan
The Terminator
 
nidan's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2002
Location: Scottsdale
Posts: 15,312
A$FN: 12,489
It reminds me of the documentries I see on Vietnam with politicians micromanaging the military.

I especially like the part about deemphasising the inconvient parts of the 'Powell Doctrine' which is what the US military created (CP was a primnary author) to reconstruct themselves after that war.

Or how recruitment is at a 30 year low.
__________________


DogTv
nidan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 18th, 2005, 09:45 AM   #5
Djaughe
Ads by Google
 

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: 85249
Posts: 22,973
A$FN: 364
Quote:
Originally Posted by wallyburger
Thanks for the link!
Djaughe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 18th, 2005, 10:20 AM   #6
SunCardfan
Registered User
 

Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,421
A$FN: 1,000
Quote:
Originally Posted by nidan
It reminds me of the documentries I see on Vietnam with politicians micromanaging the military.

I especially like the part about deemphasising the inconvient parts of the 'Powell Doctrine' which is what the US military created (CP was a primnary author) to reconstruct themselves after that war.

Or how recruitment is at a 30 year low.
Sometimes I wonder if they edit these things.. I mean I could see some generals agreeing with the numbers and others disagreeing and the show just shows the ones that didn't agree with Rumsfeld. Rumsfeld has come back many times before and stated what really happened and I think most of the time it makes him look better.

As for low numbers, I think that it to be expected. People don't like risking their lives and many join the military for salary and a new adventure. Not because they want to actually kill people or be killed....
SunCardfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 18th, 2005, 11:12 AM   #7
Djaughe
Ads by Google
 

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: 85249
Posts: 22,973
A$FN: 364
Quote:
Originally Posted by SunCardfan
...As for low numbers, I think that it to be expected. People don't like risking their lives and many join the military for salary and a new adventure. Not because they want to actually kill people or be killed....
Nid was a little off....the frontline report cites military recruitment being at a 3 year low...not 30.
Djaughe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 18th, 2005, 12:27 PM   #8
SunCardfan
Registered User
 

Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,421
A$FN: 1,000
ahh 3, 30, 300 When it helps your argument go with what feels right
SunCardfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 18th, 2005, 12:33 PM   #9
Djaughe
Ads by Google
 

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: 85249
Posts: 22,973
A$FN: 364
Quote:
Originally Posted by SunCardfan
ahh 3, 30, 300 When it helps your argument go with what feels right
Frankly I'm not sure of what the argument is.
Djaughe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 18th, 2005, 08:41 PM   #10
nidan
The Terminator
 
nidan's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2002
Location: Scottsdale
Posts: 15,312
A$FN: 12,489
Quote:
Originally Posted by Djaughe
Nid was a little off....the frontline report cites military recruitment being at a 3 year low...not 30.
Sorry, my mistake
__________________


DogTv
nidan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 18th, 2005, 08:48 PM   #11
nidan
The Terminator
 
nidan's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2002
Location: Scottsdale
Posts: 15,312
A$FN: 12,489
It's not about editing, geeze are you realy reaching so hard to find a way to justify this.

I saw the testimony of the secretery of the army, a 4 Star general under oath to congress. He told them it would require 100,000s of troops to control Iraq after the conflict, are you suggesting he was lying to congress ?

Rumsfeld was pissed to the max because this was not he message he wanted to send. Ther fact that it was the truth didn't matter.

The original battle plans called for 480,000 troops ], if I remember the numbers correctly].

This show was not real complimentry of the Clinton era either, they reported that the pentagon, was in general looking forward to the new administration as "Now we will adults in charge". This alsted until the poiticans started micromanaging miltiary strategy.

I'm serious folks, this sounded like one of those documenteries on the Vietnam era. I watched one a couple of weeks ago, detailed how we bombed a plant for a month. On orders from the white house they fly exactly the same flitgh path every day at the same time every day for month on direct orders from the president. The actual target was destroyed in about the first 5 days.

How is this any different ? I'll tell you how it is different, GW supported seem unable to consider that anything is wrong ?
__________________


DogTv
nidan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 18th, 2005, 08:51 PM   #12
nidan
The Terminator
 
nidan's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2002
Location: Scottsdale
Posts: 15,312
A$FN: 12,489
Love the sarcasam, thanks.

This abuse of our military by the poiticians disgusts me and I cannot understand why it doesn't disgust us all ? Particulary some the pretend to support our troops. Go buy some more car magnets.

Yes, I am mad about this. If we are going to fight a war at least let the military make military decsions.
__________________


DogTv
nidan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 18th, 2005, 09:02 PM   #13
nidan
The Terminator
 
nidan's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2002
Location: Scottsdale
Posts: 15,312
A$FN: 12,489
Quote:
Originally Posted by SunCardfan
Sometimes I wonder if they edit these things.. I mean I could see some generals agreeing with the numbers and others disagreeing and the show just shows the ones that didn't agree with Rumsfeld. Rumsfeld has come back many times before and stated what really happened and I think most of the time it makes him look better.
The ones that didn't agree with Rumsfeld were the top commanders, including the general Franks who finally bowed to political pressure. Colin Powell certainly didn't agree with the plan and I think we would agree he has some experience on the matter.

Rumsfeld went shoping until he found a Colonel that agreed with him. Thisis not tough to do in any large organization. The way you phrased it demeans the opinions on the Generals in command of the Army, where they wrong or incompetant ?

It also says that Rumsfeld took direct control of military promotions, something apparently not done before. Sounds like he wanted to make sure that he had total control.

Why is it so difficult to believe that Rumsfeld [and indirectly GW] may have done something wrong or at least unadvisable. Do you want to go back to Vietnam era military planning ?
__________________


DogTv
nidan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 18th, 2005, 09:10 PM   #14
SunCardfan
Registered User
 

Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,421
A$FN: 1,000
Quote:
Originally Posted by nidan
The ones that didn't agree with Rumsfeld were the top commanders, including the general Franks who finally bowed to political pressure. Colin Powell certainly didn't agree with the plan and I think we would agree he has some experience on the matter.

Rumsfeld went shoping until he found a Colonel that agreed with him. Thisis not tough to do in any large organization. The way you phrased it demeans the opinions on the Generals in command of the Army, where they wrong or incompetant ?

It also says that Rumsfeld took direct control of military promotions, something apparently not done before. Sounds like he wanted to make sure that he had total control.

Why is it so difficult to believe that Rumsfeld [and indirectly GW] may have done something wrong or at least unadvisable. Do you want to go back to Vietnam era military planning ?
Hey maybe you're right on this one, not sure. Especially if he had to find someone to agree with. Demeaning a four star general though? Common.... That would mean you are being demeaning to the secretary of defence and the president of the united states... Leaders that are judged by the people to be higher ranking...you never seem to mind ripping on them... There are many four star generals in the past that have been wrong...
SunCardfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 18th, 2005, 09:12 PM   #15
SunCardfan
Registered User
 

Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,421
A$FN: 1,000
Oh by the way the military is very political...they are politicans and you especially have to be a politician to become a four star general..if you piss anybody off that's important you never get promoted that high..noone has to watch his ass and kiss others more than a high ranking solider who wants to keep getting promoted...
SunCardfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Sitemap:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:35 AM.



Subscribe in a reader
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007 - 2008, PixelFX Studios
Copyright © 2002 - 2006 ArizonaSportsFans.com
Inactive Reminders By Icora Web Design