Welcome to ASFN Fan Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.
Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!
Economy Must Improving - Senate Gives Itself A Raise
Senate Approves Pay Increase for Itself
By JIM ABRAMS, Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON - For the fifth straight year, members of Congress will see a jump in their paychecks in 2004, with election-year salaries rising from the current $154,700 to about $158,000.
The Senate, on a 60-34 vote Thursday, rejected a proposal to exempt senators from a cost-of-living increase going to all civilian federal workers and military personnel. Last month the House, by a similar convincing margin, also turned back an attempt to deny lawmakers an automatic share of the COLA increase.
As in past years, the effort to deny senators their pay raise was led by Sen. Russ Feingold, D-Wis., who has a policy of returning to the Treasury any pay he receives that is above his salary when he began his six-year term.
"How can Congress give itself a $3,400 pay raise while nearly 9 million people are unemployed, and 2 million have been out of work for more than half a year," Feingold asked.
With the latest increase, he said, members will have received five consecutive pay hikes totaling more than $21,000.
Congressional salaries showed little movement in the 1990s, when Republicans gained majorities in Congress under a platform of curtailing overall government spending, but in recent years lawmakers have accepted their COLAs with little fanfare.
"I think that our representatives of government deserve a pay raise consistent with the work that we've produced," said Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist.
"This is not a pay raise. This is an increase that's required by law," said Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Ted Stevens, R-Alaska. The question, Stevens said, "is whether the cost-of-living provision in this bill should provide to members as it does to other people who work for the federal government."
The $90 billion spending bill for the Transportation and Treasury departments in fiscal 2004 includes a 4.1 percent COLA for most federal workers and military personnel. Under a complicated formula, that translates to 2.2 percent for members of Congress, Vice President Cheney and Supreme Court justices. The raise goes into effect automatically unless lawmakers vote to exempt themselves from it.
That's slightly less than the average wage increase in private business. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, wages among all nongovernment workers rose an average 2.7 percent from July 2002 through June 2003.
Sen. Joseph Biden, D-Del., who voted against the Feingold measure, said it was "a no-win situation under any circumstances" because going back to the first days of Congress "there is not a single dollar amount that you could put out to the public" that they would think appropriate.
The White House objected to the 4.1 percent raise for civilian workers, saying it went beyond the president's request by $2.1 billion and exceeded the inflation rate.
The raise does not affect president Bush's salary of $400,000. Currently, the vice president, top leaders in the House and Senate and the chief justice receive $198,600. Associate justices of the Supreme Court get $190,100.
Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!
This is precisely why it rarely good that one particular political party controls multiple areas of the federal government. It removes the checks and balances system.
Originally posted by Chris_Sanders This is precisely why it rarely good that one particular political party controls multiple areas of the federal government. It removes the checks and balances system.
Congress has voted itself raises every year that I can remember regardless of who had a majority. Although I do like how you are trying to spin this as if its only republicans who shaft the tax-payer.
Originally posted by Chris_Sanders This is precisely why it rarely good that one particular political party controls multiple areas of the federal government.
I don't see a point to this statement other then saying that since the Republicans have a majority in congress and control the White House that is why they voted to give themselves raises.
When in fact history shows us that it doesn't matter who controls what, Congress nearly always gives themselves a yearly raise.
If you had said this about partial birth abortion bans or the tax cut, then I may not have agreed but I would have understood the position since that is something that can get pushed through because of a single political party having complete control over that entire process.
Linear Mode
