Enjoy an Ads-Free ASFN - lighter and faster too! Become an ASFN-Contributor and help support the site.
Go Back   Arizona Sports Fans Network > Other Stuff > Politics and Religion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old October 12th, 2006, 01:28 PM   #1
40yearfan
Hit me with your best shot
 
40yearfan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ.
Posts: 29,332

Chris Wallace: Registered Democrat


Thursday, Oct. 12, 2006 9:45 a.m. EDT
Chris Wallace: Registered Democrat


Bill Clinton accused interviewer Chris Wallace of doing a "nice conservative little hit job” when Wallace recently grilled him about his administration’s pursuit of Osama bin Laden on "Fox News Sunday.”


Evidently Clinton didn’t do his homework regarding Wallace’s political leanings. The Washington Post did – and found that the newsman has been a registered Democrat for more than 20 years.


Wallace, who lives in Washington, told the Post: "The reason I’m a registered Democrat is that in Washington, D.C., there is really only one party. If you want a say in who’s going to be the next mayor or councilman, you have to vote in the Democratic primary.”


Wallace also said he’s voted for members of both parties, and insisted that he keeps his politics out of his work: "However I vote personally, I think I’m professional enough that it doesn’t have anything to do with the way I cover the news.”
Enjoy an Ads-Free ASFN - lighter and faster too! Become an ASFN-Contributor and help support the site.
40yearfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 12th, 2006, 01:33 PM   #2
Mulli
Witness for the Prosecution!!
 
Mulli's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Northwest Gotham
Posts: 31,503
What is the point?
__________________
Mulli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 12th, 2006, 01:47 PM   #3
40yearfan
Hit me with your best shot
 
40yearfan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ.
Posts: 29,332
The point is that Clinton called him out as a member of the conservative party.
40yearfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 12th, 2006, 03:21 PM   #4
DWKB
Registered
 
DWKB's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2002
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 5,956
Quote:
Originally Posted by 40yearfan View Post
Wallace, who lives in Washington, told the Post: "The reason I’m a registered Democrat is that in Washington, D.C., there is really only one party. If you want a say in who’s going to be the next mayor or councilman, you have to vote in the Democratic primary.”

So, since he lives in D.C. and it carries a vast majority Demo vote. He registered Democrat so he can vote for the most appealing candidate that might take office instead of "wasting" his vote?

That doesn't sounds an aweful like semantics and doesn't show Wallace's political leanings, it shows the futility of the electorial system.

Ya know, if you know a Demo will get elected, register that way so you can vote against the most liberal in the Primary?
__________________
Constantly making conclusive and hyperbolic claims doesn't make you a dissident, it makes you an easily used tool.
DWKB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 12th, 2006, 04:03 PM   #5
Linderbee
Moderator
 
Linderbee's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: MESA! :thud:
Posts: 21,527
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by 40yearfan View Post
The point is that Clinton called him out as a member of the conservative party.
Clinton never said he was a Republican. He said he was conservative. And Chris Wallace pretty much said as much--the "only" reason he is registered Dem is so he can vote in the primary, since that's the party that always wins in DC, apparently.

Since I am liberal, I would never say the "only" reason I'm registered Dem is so I can vote in the primary.
__________________
dreamcastrocks--My Hero!!

11/23/09: I'm putting it in writing. Matt Leinart will be a great QB. When the time comes for all you haters to eat crow, I'll be there serving it to you, wearing a #7 on my chest.

"I can't see Jesus rolling in an Escalade"
Linderbee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 12th, 2006, 04:48 PM   #6
KloD
Pimping Freedom Ain't Easy
 
Cosmic Defender Champion!
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 8,949
Hell, I am registered as a republican 40. Would you claim me a conservative? If you believe Wallace has a liberal bone in his body, you have those blinders on that you accuse others of possessing.
KloD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 12th, 2006, 06:31 PM   #7
Mulli
Witness for the Prosecution!!
 
Mulli's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Northwest Gotham
Posts: 31,503
Quote:
Originally Posted by 40yearfan View Post
The point is that Clinton called him out as a member of the conservative party.
Why take a shot at an ex-president? Isn't he a tad irrelevant?
__________________
Mulli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 12th, 2006, 07:05 PM   #8
Divide Et Impera
Registered User
 
Divide Et Impera's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Maricopa, AZ
Posts: 9,821
I'm actually registered as a Republican, too....
__________________
Quintus: People should know when they are conquered.

Maximus: Would you, Quintus? Would I?
Divide Et Impera is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 13th, 2006, 05:45 AM   #9
Absolute Zero
Registered User
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,172
Quote:
Originally Posted by 40yearfan View Post
The point is that Clinton called him out as a member of the conservative party.

What is this "conservative" party that you speak of?
__________________
http://outsidethewalls.com/
Absolute Zero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 13th, 2006, 05:49 AM   #10
wallyburger
Agent Provocateur
 
wallyburger's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: via pacis
Posts: 22,006
Quote:
Originally Posted by Absolute Zero View Post
What is this "conservative" party that you speak of?
The opposite of the "liberal" party?????
__________________

"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities."

--Voltaire
wallyburger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 13th, 2006, 05:57 AM   #11
Pariah
H.S.
 
Pariah's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Aventine
Posts: 31,417
I'm not registered as a republican.
Pariah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 13th, 2006, 06:08 AM   #12
Absolute Zero
Registered User
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,172
Quote:
Originally Posted by wallyburger View Post
The opposite of the "liberal" party?????
The liberal party? That must be the big spending party that is currently in control of Congress and the White House and spending $248 billion more each year than it is bringing in. Dang liberals!
__________________
http://outsidethewalls.com/
Absolute Zero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 13th, 2006, 07:07 AM   #13
CardFan67
Don't touch my tail!
 
CardFan67's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: So Cal
Posts: 4,217
Send a message via Yahoo to CardFan67
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pariah View Post
I'm not registered as a republican.
I switched about 6 years ago and registered Independent... I don't know if it is the same in every region but if you are registered independent you get a ton of garbage in the mail near election time. I have since switched back just due to the mail I was recieving. But there is no party that I consider myself affiliated with.
CardFan67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 13th, 2006, 07:41 AM   #14
40yearfan
Hit me with your best shot
 
40yearfan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ.
Posts: 29,332
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mulli808 View Post
Why take a shot at an ex-president? Isn't he a tad irrelevant?

Ah ha. And there-in lies the real issue. Liberals feel because CW was asking hard questions, he was picking on BC. BC overreacted and it became a conservative/liberal issue rather than a chance for BC to explain why he did what he did. He had a rational explanation, but chose to take the antagonistic route. Misread on his part and only adding to the gulf between the two parties.
40yearfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 13th, 2006, 07:42 AM   #15
Mulli
Witness for the Prosecution!!
 
Mulli's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Northwest Gotham
Posts: 31,503
Quote:
Originally Posted by 40yearfan View Post
Ah ha. And there-in lies the real issue. Liberals feel because CW was asking hard questions, he was picking on BC. BC overreacted and it became a conservative/liberal issue rather than a chance for BC to explain why he did what he did. He had a rational explanation, but chose to take the antagonistic route. Misread on his part and only adding to the gulf between the two parties.
I was referring to you taking a shot.
__________________
Mulli is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Sitemap:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:54 AM.



Subscribe in a reader
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007 - 2008, PixelFX Studios
Inactive Reminders By Icora Web Design