Does Hamm have a point?
I would have given the gold to the Korean because the gold medal is more of a symbol anyways and he would have been thought of as the big story of the olympics and would have been lauded by everyone.
After reading what Hamm said, he does have a point though. He said the olympic committe isn't supposed to be able to go back to look at the video afterwords but if they did they would see that the Korean did four holds instead of the three allowed which would have docked his score anyways. So possibly if the match had been scored the right way Hamm may have one anyways...