September 11th, 2006, 03:39 AM
|
#1
|
|
The Cardinal Smiles
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Nashville
Posts: 16,488
|
Physics Help!
I have a hw due today at 1pm
this is the last problem on the assignment...some help?
City A lies directly west of city B. When there is no wind, an airliner makes the round trip flight of distance s between them in a flight time of t1 while traveling at the same speed in both directions. When a strong, steady wind is blowing from west to east and the airliner has the same air speed as before, the round trip takes a flight time of t2.
How fast is the wind?
__________________
Signed,
arthurpostpadder
|
|
|
September 11th, 2006, 03:40 AM
|
#2
|
|
The Cardinal Smiles
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Nashville
Posts: 16,488
|
I have the velocity when theres no wind: v = 2s/t1
i think i also have the avg velocity when there is wind: Vavg = s/t2
__________________
Signed,
arthurpostpadder
|
|
|
September 11th, 2006, 06:43 AM
|
#3
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 9,104
|
42...
IHNFC (there is a reason I was a jarhead!!)
__________________
 All Hell is breakin loose!!!!!
nothing worth having is freely given... it is earned through hard work and sacrifice.
I'm sorry Thomas!!!
|
|
|
September 11th, 2006, 07:21 AM
|
#4
|
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 16,771
|
Is this an African or European flight?
|
|
|
September 11th, 2006, 07:25 AM
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Maricopa, AZ
Posts: 13,786
|
I just forwarded this thread to your instructor for cheating....
__________________
Quintus: People should know when they are conquered.
Maximus: Would you, Quintus? Would I?
|
|
|
September 11th, 2006, 07:25 AM
|
#6
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Maricopa, AZ
Posts: 13,786
|
__________________
Quintus: People should know when they are conquered.
Maximus: Would you, Quintus? Would I?
|
|
|
September 11th, 2006, 08:42 AM
|
#7
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 4,884
|
Arthur, you know the following:
t1=s/v+s/v=2s/v
t2=s/(v+w)+s/(v-w)
v=2s/t1
s, t1, t2, and v are all known. All that's left is to do the algebra (and make sure everything is in terms of s, t1, and t2). You have to multiply those fractions in the t2 equation by (v-w)/(v-w) and (v+w)/(v+w) respectively to get a common denominator (v^2-w^2). The rest I'll leave up to you.
|
|
|
September 11th, 2006, 09:43 AM
|
#8
|
|
The Cardinal Smiles
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Nashville
Posts: 16,488
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by nm132
Arthur, you know the following:
t1=s/v+s/v=2s/v
t2=s/(v+w)+s/(v-w)
v=2s/t1
s, t1, t2, and v are all known. All that's left is to do the algebra (and make sure everything is in terms of s, t1, and t2). You have to multiply those fractions in the t2 equation by (v-w)/(v-w) and (v+w)/(v+w) respectively to get a common denominator (v^2-w^2). The rest I'll leave up to you.
|
ok
so i get:
t2 = 2vs/(v^2-w^2)
then i solve for w to get (and i plug in 2s/t1 for v):
w = sqrt(v^2 - 2vs/t2)
is this correct? because the online program says its not.
__________________
Signed,
arthurpostpadder
|
|
|
September 11th, 2006, 10:35 AM
|
#9
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 4,884
|
You have to plug stuff into an online program? That sucks. If it asks for a solution involving algebra is it able to discriminate between different ways you can write the answer?
Yeah I think that answer is right. That's what I got for w, with it simplifying to the form: w=2s/t1*sqrt(1-t1/t2)
which passes the sanity check of t1=t2 -> w=0.
Maybe there's something we're missing but everything seems right to me.
|
|
|
September 11th, 2006, 10:54 AM
|
#10
|
|
Frell.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 21,131
|
Yeah I was a Sociology/Criminology major in college... sorry Arthur.
But good luck!
__________________
Rest in peace, Skkorp. We'll never forget you.
|
|
|
September 11th, 2006, 11:03 AM
|
#11
|
|
The Cardinal Smiles
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Nashville
Posts: 16,488
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by nm132
You have to plug stuff into an online program? That sucks. If it asks for a solution involving algebra is it able to discriminate between different ways you can write the answer?
Yeah I think that answer is right. That's what I got for w, with it simplifying to the form: w=2s/t1*sqrt(1-t1/t2)
which passes the sanity check of t1=t2 -> w=0.
Maybe there's something we're missing but everything seems right to me.
|
yup
it sucks
it said i was off by a multiplicative factor....
stupid masteringphsics.com....
__________________
Signed,
arthurpostpadder
|
|
|
September 11th, 2006, 11:16 AM
|
#12
|
|
The Cardinal Smiles
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Nashville
Posts: 16,488
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by nm132
You have to plug stuff into an online program? That sucks. If it asks for a solution involving algebra is it able to discriminate between different ways you can write the answer?
Yeah I think that answer is right. That's what I got for w, with it simplifying to the form: w=2s/t1*sqrt(1-t1/t2)
which passes the sanity check of t1=t2 -> w=0.
Maybe there's something we're missing but everything seems right to me.
|
i think it plugs in numbers to check
i entered both forms of the solution (simplified and unsimplified)...wrong both times
i hate doing physics on a computer...
__________________
Signed,
arthurpostpadder
|
|
|
September 11th, 2006, 11:22 AM
|
#13
|
|
The Cardinal Smiles
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Nashville
Posts: 16,488
|
wow...im an idiot.
s is the round trip distance...not one way...
__________________
Signed,
arthurpostpadder
|
|
|
September 11th, 2006, 11:36 AM
|
#14
|
|
The Cardinal Smiles
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Nashville
Posts: 16,488
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by arthurracoon
wow...im an idiot.
s is the round trip distance...not one way...
|
yup...i got it...
thanks nm132!

__________________
Signed,
arthurpostpadder
|
|
|
September 11th, 2006, 11:43 AM
|
#15
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 4,884
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by arthurracoon
wow...im an idiot.
|
Me too. I was reading your post about it telling you that you were off my a multiplicative factor and then realized what the issue was. 
|
|
|
|
|