Enjoy an Ads-Free ASFN - lighter and faster too! Become an ASFN-Contributor and help support the site.
Go Back   Arizona Sports Fans Network > Other Stuff > Movies and Entertainment

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old July 22nd, 2003, 10:42 PM   #1
Brian in Mesa
BIM™
 
Brian in Mesa's Avatar
 
Tetris Champion!
Join Date: May 2002
Location: The Dark Side
Posts: 38,955
Send a message via MSN to Brian in Mesa Send a message via Yahoo to Brian in Mesa

Roman Polanski


Roman Polanski in libel suit with Vanity Fair


Eils Lotozo
Knight Ridder Newspapers
July 15, 2003


We're not sure why a guy who's been on the lam from sex-related felony charges for more than 20 years should be fretting so about his reputation, but Roman Polanski, winner of this year's Best Director Oscar for "The Pianist," is said to be lining up an all-star cast from some of his best-known films to testify in a libel suit against Vanity Fair.

The magazine wrote a year ago that in 1969 he made a sexual overture to a Swedish beauty at a restaurant when he stopped in New York en route to the funeral of his wife, actress Sharon Tate. Tate was murdered by followers of cultist Charles Manson when she was eight months pregnant.

Polanski, 69, who lives in Paris because of the indictment in a California court, is hoping to testify via video link, the Times of London reported.

Polanski copped to statutory rape after having sex with a 13-year-old at Jack Nicholson's home in 1977. In 1978, he fled to France upon learning the judge wanted to tear up the plea bargain and send him to prison.

On his wish list of witnesses for the trial that begins in November are Mia Farrow, Catherine Deneuve and "Pianist" best actor winner Adrien Brody.

Polanski is suing in London because British libel laws will force the magazine to prove it did not commit libel. But extradition treaties between Britain and the United States will keep Polanski in France.

Find this article at:
http://www.azcentral.com/ent/celeb/0715polanski.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

How dare Vanity Fair say something negative about the child-molester also known as Roman Polanski... :roll:
Enjoy an Ads-Free ASFN - lighter and faster too! Become an ASFN-Contributor and help support the site.
__________________
HONEY BADGER DON'T CARE
Brian in Mesa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 20th, 2005, 08:23 AM   #2
Brian in Mesa
BIM™
 
Brian in Mesa's Avatar
 
Tetris Champion!
Join Date: May 2002
Location: The Dark Side
Posts: 38,955
Send a message via MSN to Brian in Mesa Send a message via Yahoo to Brian in Mesa
Editor Stands by Claim Against Polanski
By JILL LAWLESS, Associated Press Writer

A New York magazine editor testified Wednesday that Roman Polanski made "tasteless and vulgar" advances to a woman at a Manhattan restaurant shortly after the death of his wife, Sharon Tate.

Testifying in Polanski's libel lawsuit against publisher Conde Nast, Lewis Lapham, editor of Harper's magazine, confirmed that he was the source of an anecdote related in a 2002 article in Vanity Fair magazine.

The article reported Polanski had tried to seduce a woman at Elaine's restaurant while he was traveling to Los Angeles for his wife's funeral. Tate, who was pregnant, was killed by followers of serial killer Charles Manson in August 1969.

Polanski, who testified Monday by video link from Paris, called the story "an abominable lie" that "dishonors my memory of Sharon."

Lapham, 70, told the jury in High Court that he was with model Beatte Telle when Polanski sat at their table.

"He began to talk to her in a forward way. He began to praise her beauty and speak to her — romance her," Lapham said.

"At one point he (Polanski) had his hand on her leg and said to her, `I can put you in movies. I can make you the next Sharon Tate.' He meant it as a compliment. He was attempting to impress her, wanting to express his admiration for her looks," Lapham said.

"I was impressed by the remark, not only because it was tasteless and vulgar, but because it was a cliche."

Conde Nast now accepts that the incident didn't happen before Tate's funeral, but says it was about two weeks later. The publisher maintains the article is substantially true.

Lawyers for Conde Nast have attempted to paint Polanski as a "fugitive from morality" and a fantasist incapable of telling the truth on important matters.

Polanski conceded during his testimony that he was unfaithful and has little memory of the weeks following his wife's death.

The director, now 71, has lived in France since fleeing child-sex charges in the United States in 1978. He was unwilling to come to Britain for fear of extradition.

On Tuesday, Mia Farrow, star of Polanski's 1968 film, "Rosemary's Baby," described his sense of "despair and bewilderment and loss" after Tate's murder.

Farrow said she had been with Polanski that night at Elaine's and he had been "unable to talk about anything else ... He just kept saying over and over, `Why? Why?'"

Conde Nast is based in New York, but libel actions concerning the international media are often brought in British courts because they are considered friendlier to claimants than U.S. courts.
__________________
HONEY BADGER DON'T CARE
Brian in Mesa is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Sitemap:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:36 AM.



Subscribe in a reader
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007 - 2008, PixelFX Studios
Inactive Reminders By Icora Web Design