June 2nd, 2003, 09:02 AM
|
#1
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Brooklyn, 11222
Posts: 4,866
|
New Matrix RELOADED thread. (spoilers)
3 out of 5 stars, I guess.
I think the CGi was WAY overdone. I would have liked more wire tirckery like in the first one, as you still have the human element in that technique and the movements aren't perfect like a computer makes them. The technology is sure impressive, but I like wire stunts better still.
The Wachowski brothers had their hands tied a bit in that the original movie was so fantastic, because its exposed the premise of what the matrix is. With the audience knowing that going in, they had to develop a story within those confines, and that seemed to lower the story to that of an average action flick, and not the psychological/philosphical drama the original one was...
With that in mind, they tried WAY too hard to keep the philosphical edge in the movie by cramming it down your throat with cryptic and arcain dialogue. It muddled up the film.
The dance/orgy/Neo love scene sequence was the stupidest addition to the film, and TOTALLY contrived. I thought it was totally lame. When I saw those dummies dancing, I started rooting for the machines.
The freeway scene was a thrill ride, but overdone in my opinion. Maybe I'm just not ready for complete CGI takeover of stunts yet. Who knows.
IM a dumbass, I dodnt know to wait out the credits.
Overall, this film was enjoyable, but doesnt hold a torch to the original, which was absolutely breathtaking on so many levels.
|
|
|
June 2nd, 2003, 10:27 AM
|
#2
|
|
Public Enemy #1
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 21,227
|
Re: New Matrix RELOADED thread. (spoilers)
Quote:
Originally posted by schutd
3 out of 5 stars, I guess.
Overall, this film was enjoyable, but doesnt hold a torch to the original, which was absolutely breathtaking on so many levels.
|
I liked the first movie a lot, but it seems to me that it's being really overrated. It's a good movie and all, but nowhere near some of the great movies of our generation like Star Wars or even Blade Runner.
|
|
|
June 2nd, 2003, 10:43 AM
|
#3
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Brooklyn, 11222
Posts: 4,866
|
Hard to compare them, I think. Star Wars was amazing for it's time, but it is after all almost 30 years old now. I liked the premise of and the philosophy of the atrix more, but Star Wars is Star Wars and you'd be hard pressed to rate other sci fi adventure films above it.
Blade Runner I tend to agree with. A fantastic film, start to finish. A futuristic Film Noir that addresses many social concerns prevelant when it was released (and still so today for that matter).
I dont think The Matrix is overrated at all. But thats probably personal opinion. I can watch that movie over and over again. And I regularly do.
Nowhere near Blade Runner or Star Wars? I disagree. I think its damn near. Id be hard pressed to pick between Star Wars and The Matrix (from a purely cinematic standpoint, not from a nostalgic standpoint. Star Wars screenplay is prety awful, IMO, and thats a HUGE part of a film to me) and I have to take Blade RUnner above The Matrix, but not by the wide margin you suggest.
|
|
|
June 2nd, 2003, 10:44 AM
|
#4
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Kandahar Province, AFG
Posts: 13,871
|
Re: Re: New Matrix RELOADED thread. (spoilers)
Quote:
Originally posted by Chaplin
I liked the first movie a lot, but it seems to me that it's being really overrated. It's a good movie and all, but nowhere near some of the great movies of our generation like Star Wars or even Blade Runner.
|
I read "Do Androids dream of Electric Sheep" before I saw Blade Runner, and I have to admit that I thought Blade Runner was terrible.
The book was just so much better, that I spent the entire time thinking about how I need to get a copy of the book.
__________________
“Somewhere a True Believer is training to kill you. He is training with minimum food or water, in austere conditions, day and night. The only thing clean on him is his weapon. He doesn’t worry about what workout to do—his rucksack weighs what it weighs, and he runs until the enemy stops chasing him. The True Believer doesn’t care ‘how hard it is’; he knows he either wins or he dies. He doesn’t go home at 1700; he is home. He knows only the ‘Cause.’ Now, who wants to quit?”
NCOIC of the Special Forces Assessment and Selection Course in a welcome speech to new SF candidates
On life after football: "I wouldn't mind being a sports commentator. Having my own segment, working for ESPN, my own talk show. Part time trainer. Part time car mechanic. Part time Sprint cell phone salesman. Part time car washman. Grocery store baggage man. Football coach. Model. Actress. Stripper. And I even have dreams of being the next crocodile hunter." - Darnell Dockett
|
|
|
June 2nd, 2003, 10:46 AM
|
#5
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Brooklyn, 11222
Posts: 4,866
|
Re: Re: Re: New Matrix RELOADED thread. (spoilers)
Quote:
Originally posted by Krangthebrain
I read "Do Androids dream of Electric Sheep" before I saw Blade Runner, and I have to admit that I thought Blade Runner was terrible.
The book was just so much better, that I spent the entire time thinking about how I need to get a copy of the book.
|
A perfect example of a book ruining a film! Heh.
I never seem to have this problem, because..... well..... I never seem to read. Embarrasing to admit. But when I do, its usually not fiction.
|
|
|
June 2nd, 2003, 10:50 AM
|
#6
|
|
Public Enemy #1
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 21,227
|
Even Minority Report was much better than the first Matrix as well.
Can I watch the Matrix over and over? No. I disliked the 20 minute Morpheus speech in the beginning more than almost anything else from both movies (the rave scene and the architect convo are the only things worse).
Matrix is a great movie, a great sci-fi action movie. But is it among the best sci-fi movies of all time? No way. Not even close. It is perhaps technologically much better than Star Wars, but Star Wars has a mythology about it--Matrix does not.
|
|
|
June 2nd, 2003, 11:44 AM
|
#7
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Brooklyn, 11222
Posts: 4,866
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Chaplin
Even Minority Report was much better than the first Matrix as well.
|
Well thats a matter of taste then, because I thought Minority Report was totally underwhelming. A good film, for sure, a good premise as well, but The MAtrix to me was the perfect combination of testoterone fueled action, good filmmaking, excellent choreography, philosophy, and was visually off the hook as well. Minority Report just didnt have the on screen energy that The Matrix did. It wasnt even close IMO.
Star Wars has mythology, sure, but so what? Is it a pre requisite for good Sci-fi? I don't think so. Or by Mythology, do you mean the elevated geek like following that the series has spawned? If thats what you mean, I find that to be the most annoying part of Star Wars fandom. The mythology is inherent in the film, and brought to absurdist-like proportions by the films followers.
And which 20 minute Morpheus speach are we talking about? When he explains what the MAtrix is to Neo for the first time? Maybe an example of poor exposition, but how else could you tell it without making the movie 5 hours long? It was a needing vehicle, as Neo had just been "freed" and theres no other way to bring someone up to speed.
About the only thing I thought was done REALLY well with Reloaded was the twist they threw into the story by divulging what the purpose of "the One" really was. A good twist. Too bad it was muddied in that philosophical aural assault by the architect. Because that point was more important tan any other in the whole film, and it was lost in all the jargon.
|
|
|
June 2nd, 2003, 01:38 PM
|
#8
|
|
Public Enemy #1
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 21,227
|
Quote:
Originally posted by schutd
About the only thing I thought was done REALLY well with Reloaded was the twist they threw into the story by divulging what the purpose of "the One" really was. A good twist. Too bad it was muddied in that philosophical aural assault by the architect. Because that point was more important tan any other in the whole film, and it was lost in all the jargon.
|
But IMO that hurts the film immensely. That first speech by Morpheus in the first movie could have been written much better. As a writer, the quality of writing means a lot to me in a film. It's actually the script that makes the difference between the two cuts of Blade Runner. And just like a movie can be underwritten, it can be overwritten--which both Matrix movies are. But that's just my preference.
As to the mythology, Star Wars is more than just a movie, it is, as cliched as it sounds, a way of life. That's what makes it better.
|
|
|
June 2nd, 2003, 03:09 PM
|
#9
|
|
An Army of One
Join Date: May 2003
Location: lat: 35.231 lon: -111.550
Posts: 13,072
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Chaplin
But IMO that hurts the film immensely. That first speech by Morpheus in the first movie could have been written much better. As a writer, the quality of writing means a lot to me in a film. It's actually the script that makes the difference between the two cuts of Blade Runner. And just like a movie can be underwritten, it can be overwritten--which both Matrix movies are. But that's just my preference.
As to the mythology, Star Wars is more than just a movie, it is, as cliched as it sounds, a way of life. That's what makes it better.
|
I was not impressed with the Morheus speech either. It sounded like someone wrote it in 10 minutes. It was supposed to be inspiring, but I thought it was dull. The Arhitect speech was a confusing, techno-babble mess IMO.
I liked the first Matrix much better. Loved the first two Star Wars movies, but haven't found much to love since.
__________________
|
|
|
June 2nd, 2003, 04:06 PM
|
#10
|
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Mesa
Posts: 35,580
|
When Neo is fighting the 100 agent Smiths...he almost looked "cartoonish" and that was displeasing to me. Also, the original Matrix had a "reality vs. make-believe" feel to it. By that I a mean, it was believeable to a certain extent....now Neo is flying around and everybody is doing crazy stunts off cars and crap like that. The movie is cool but it really lost a certain edge that the first one had.
|
|
|
June 2nd, 2003, 05:29 PM
|
#11
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 30,778
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Chaplin
But IMO that hurts the film immensely. That first speech by Morpheus in the first movie could have been written much better. As a writer, the quality of writing means a lot to me in a film. It's actually the script that makes the difference between the two cuts of Blade Runner. And just like a movie can be underwritten, it can be overwritten--which both Matrix movies are. But that's just my preference.
As to the mythology, Star Wars is more than just a movie, it is, as cliched as it sounds, a way of life. That's what makes it better.
|
As a writer, I am shocked at your opinion of Minority Report. That movie had all the tools at it's disposal and failed miserably, not to mention it was ridiculously predictable. Talk about a movie not following the rules it set out for itself. Gotta say, it looked incredible though - although almos anything Januz Kaminski touches looks awesome.
And Blade Runner - man - is it me or is that a movie that you either love and revere or just hate it and don't understand what all the fuss is about. I don't know anyone that thinks Blade Runenr is just OK - it's always one extreme or the other.
__________________
Rubarb is what makes my feet look cheese!
Mulli is smarter than the Cheese!
|
|
|
June 2nd, 2003, 05:57 PM
|
#12
|
|
An Army of One
Join Date: May 2003
Location: lat: 35.231 lon: -111.550
Posts: 13,072
|
Quote:
Originally posted by cheesebeef
As a writer, I am shocked at your opinion of Minority Report. That movie had all the tools at it's disposal and failed miserably, not to mention it was ridiculously predictable. Talk about a movie not following the rules it set out for itself. Gotta say, it looked incredible though - although almos anything Januz Kaminski touches looks awesome.
And Blade Runner - man - is it me or is that a movie that you either love and revere or just hate it and don't understand what all the fuss is about. I don't know anyone that thinks Blade Runenr is just OK - it's always one extreme or the other.
|
I agree completely with your review of Minority Report. The basic plot, who was the murderer, was laughable! It was basically the same as Monsters Inc.. Yeah, the killer is the leader, the mentor etc. How many movies have used that plot? Dozens? Hundreds? That movie could have been so much better.
Loved Blade Runner. Loved the look, the plot, the characters. One of the best sci-fi movies ever IMO.
__________________
|
|
|
June 2nd, 2003, 06:11 PM
|
#13
|
|
Formerly Chandler Mike
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 16,343
|
I was bored out of my mind in Bladerunner, and I've only seen Minority Report once, as opposed to seeing The Matrix at least 15 times.
I could watch Matrix over and over, and I don't think in any way was it overrated. If anything, it's better that Minority Report, if not just as good.
How else do you explain a sequel that smashed all kinds of opening records for an R-rated movie? Or for any movie for that matter?
People LOVED the first one, wanted to see the second. I can't imagine a sequel to Minority Report would even come close to what Reloaded did.
Mike
|
|
|
June 3rd, 2003, 07:16 AM
|
#14
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Circle City, IN
Posts: 1,910
|
Eh, Equilibrium was better than all of them. 
__________________
"To take from one because it is thought that his own industry and that of his father's has acquired too much, in order to spare to others, who, or whose fathers have not exercised equal industry and skill, is to violate arbitrarily the first principle of association--'the guarantee to every one of a free exercise of his industry and the fruits acquired by it.'" - Thomas Jefferson
|
|
|
June 3rd, 2003, 07:47 AM
|
#15
|
|
Public Enemy #1
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 21,227
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Chandler Mike
People LOVED the first one, wanted to see the second. I can't imagine a sequel to Minority Report would even come close to what Reloaded did.
Mike
|
Whatever. This has nothing to do with what a "sequel" to Minority Report would do. And I don't care what a movie "does". Dumb and Dumberer is going to make a ton of money, does that make it some great thing??
By the way, I saw Matrix Reloaded again last night, and my original thought that the Oracle had a hand in creating the Matrix is wrong. The Oracle was created (probably by the Architect) to give the machines an idea of human physiology in order to exploit them to their fullest capacity. But somewhere along the way, she became almost human herself.
The Matrix is basically a cycle--everything is Zion, but in order to keep the human defiance in check (stemming from making different choices), the Matrix created Zion and the One in order to complete a cycle. Everything up until the point Neo has to make a choice points to him choosing the door with the Source. Unfortunately, this 6th "One" has something the other 5 "Ones" didn't have: Trinity. It is this choice that screws everything up. Of course, the architect says that if he chooses that door the human race will be exterminated. But he was probably just blowing smoke up Neo's arse.
|
|
|
|
|