Discussion in 'Polls' started by LoyaltyisaCurse, Aug 22, 2006.
This 1st installment of a my cynical poll have fun...
[email protected] Installment...these should be fun.
I was wondering why LIAC wanted to borrow a roll of tin foil from me.
I'll take door #3. Everytime I think this whacko admin has reached their limit in audacity, they disappoint me and take it another step further.
How does the tin foil hat figure into this scenario?
we picked the same thing!
I sure as hell hope so. Either us or the Israelis need to take Iran and Syrian out. But, I'm gonna go with 3, I doubt we will attack. My guess is that we will take Israel off the leash, arm them with everything we've got and sit back and enjoy.
I need help.
I am suprised I am the only person to select no. I can't believe they would strike Iran until Iraq is more stable. It would be political suicide.
He won't. We don't even have enough troops in Iraq. Even a basic game of Risk would tell you attacking Iran right now is impossible.
I agree. Unless Iran forces our hand.
We are talking about "attacking" not necessarily "invading" though.
I put the tin foil comments for those who think its conspiracy theory... Something tells me attack will happen right before election to give the Pubs a boost...
why do you think it would give them a boost? if, like you claim, most of america is sick of the "crazy neo-con agenda," wouldn't that hurt republicans?
They just THINK it will give them a boost, because they're stupid.
Agreed. And, even if Iran did force our hand, would we have the resources to lauch an adequate attack?
Separate names with a comma.