<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Breaking Murphy&#8217;s Law</title>
	<link>http://www.arizonasportsfans.com/2007/09/breaking-murphys-law/</link>
	<description>The number one Arizona Sports fan site on the planet</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 17:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: qxqrotybgb</title>
		<link>http://www.arizonasportsfans.com/2007/09/breaking-murphys-law/#comment-2692</link>
		<author>qxqrotybgb</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 05:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.arizonasportsfans.com/2007/09/breaking-murphys-law/#comment-2692</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://uk.geocities.com/pharmacyhdekille/qbfvi/movies-porn-index.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;movies porn index&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://uk.geocities.com/pharmacyhdekille/qbfvi/movies-porn-index.htm" >movies porn index</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zezkfytmzy</title>
		<link>http://www.arizonasportsfans.com/2007/09/breaking-murphys-law/#comment-2587</link>
		<author>zezkfytmzy</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 19:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.arizonasportsfans.com/2007/09/breaking-murphys-law/#comment-2587</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://uk.geocities.com/baccaratossplay/xcbze-zn/free-teaxas-holdem-poker-sites.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;free teaxas holdem poker sites&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://uk.geocities.com/baccaratossplay/xcbze-zn/free-teaxas-holdem-poker-sites.htm" >free teaxas holdem poker sites</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wmdxrmcfjh</title>
		<link>http://www.arizonasportsfans.com/2007/09/breaking-murphys-law/#comment-2260</link>
		<author>wmdxrmcfjh</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 13:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.arizonasportsfans.com/2007/09/breaking-murphys-law/#comment-2260</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://ca.geocities.com/can799casino/mttju-me/free-roulette-system.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;free roulette system&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ca.geocities.com/can799casino/mttju-me/free-roulette-system.htm" >free roulette system</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dvgpqpmxfh</title>
		<link>http://www.arizonasportsfans.com/2007/09/breaking-murphys-law/#comment-2219</link>
		<author>dvgpqpmxfh</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 01:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.arizonasportsfans.com/2007/09/breaking-murphys-law/#comment-2219</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://uk.geocities.com/nude554for/vgrmj-yn/porn-star-revealed.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;porn star revealed&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://uk.geocities.com/nude554for/vgrmj-yn/porn-star-revealed.htm" >porn star revealed</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.arizonasportsfans.com/2007/09/breaking-murphys-law/#comment-583</link>
		<author>Eric</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 21:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.arizonasportsfans.com/2007/09/breaking-murphys-law/#comment-583</guid>
		<description>And that's football field grass, not Ricky Williams type grass.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And that&#8217;s football field grass, not Ricky Williams type grass&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.arizonasportsfans.com/2007/09/breaking-murphys-law/#comment-582</link>
		<author>Eric</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 21:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.arizonasportsfans.com/2007/09/breaking-murphys-law/#comment-582</guid>
		<description>Rugbymuffin is right, you can't address every need you have in the offseason, especially when teams are paying $10 million/yr for a CB and $7 million a year for OL that haven't been to the probowl.  I'd be more pissed had the Cards thrown away their money at someone like that.  We'll get Faneca next year in FA and maybe another OL.

The FA pool was weak and I thought they got good players for a good price.   The only part of FA that sucked for the Cards was not being able to sign Reggie Kelly.  I think he didn't sign because the Cards were going to use him more for blocking than pass catching and he didn't like that.  I don't know for sure but that's what I think.

Buster Davis was supposed to be a good prospect but I didn't see one thing from him in preseason.  I love the fact that we got Moses.  Everyone on sports sites are saying they still can't believe the Raiders cut him.  Cards did a great job picking him up right away.

As for the OL, defenses haven't so much as touched Matt in the preseason, which tells me they are doing an excellent job of pass protecting.  I saw a lot of blitzes and the line picked up every single one of them.  The passing game will open up the run game.  I still don't buy Whisenhunt's 55% nonsense.  Maybe in the second half when we have a lead we'll run, but not in the first half, not when you have Q, F and J out there.  

It doesn't matter how good the team looks on paper, it's how good they look on grass.  Michigan looked good on paper at #5, now look at them.  I'll wait until midway through the season before I analyze how good they look.  It's all speculation at this point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rugbymuffin is right, you can&#8217;t address every need you have in the offseason, especially when teams are paying $10 million/yr for a CB and $7 million a year for OL that haven&#8217;t been to the probowl.  I&#8217;d be more pissed had the Cards thrown away their money at someone like that.  We&#8217;ll get Faneca next year in FA and maybe another OL.</p>
<p>The FA pool was weak and I thought they got good players for a good price.   The only part of FA that sucked for the Cards was not being able to sign Reggie Kelly.  I think he didn&#8217;t sign because the Cards were going to use him more for blocking than pass catching and he didn&#8217;t like that.  I don&#8217;t know for sure but that&#8217;s what I think.</p>
<p>Buster Davis was supposed to be a good prospect but I didn&#8217;t see one thing from him in preseason.  I love the fact that we got Moses.  Everyone on sports sites are saying they still can&#8217;t believe the Raiders cut him.  Cards did a great job picking him up right away.</p>
<p>As for the OL, defenses haven&#8217;t so much as touched Matt in the preseason, which tells me they are doing an excellent job of pass protecting.  I saw a lot of blitzes and the line picked up every single one of them.  The passing game will open up the run game.  I still don&#8217;t buy Whisenhunt&#8217;s 55% nonsense.  Maybe in the second half when we have a lead we&#8217;ll run, but not in the first half, not when you have Q, F and J out there.  </p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t matter how good the team looks on paper, it&#8217;s how good they look on grass.  Michigan looked good on paper at #5, now look at them.  I&#8217;ll wait until midway through the season before I analyze how good they look.  It&#8217;s all speculation at this point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.arizonasportsfans.com/2007/09/breaking-murphys-law/#comment-581</link>
		<author>Ryan</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 21:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.arizonasportsfans.com/2007/09/breaking-murphys-law/#comment-581</guid>
		<description>RUGBY MUFFIN!!!! You are point -set - match.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RUGBY MUFFIN!!!! You are point -set - match.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Gollin</title>
		<link>http://www.arizonasportsfans.com/2007/09/breaking-murphys-law/#comment-578</link>
		<author>Jeff Gollin</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.arizonasportsfans.com/2007/09/breaking-murphys-law/#comment-578</guid>
		<description>The tone of this piece seemed to reflect the mindset of "If I were GM, I'd do things differently and, because of that, the Cards are going to suck."

I think it's a bit  over-the-top to assume that every potential risk you're concerned with will become absolute fact. Some will, some won't. And there will probably be a few positive surprises as well.

Also - You can't go wrong when you point to lack of depth (especially at OT) being a potential Achilles Heel. But this doesn't mean this shortcoming will definitely come back to bite us. 

For these reasons, I don't feel it was a particularly objective article. Suggest you change your brand and type of morning coffee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The tone of this piece seemed to reflect the mindset of &#8220;If I were GM, I&#8217;d do things differently and, because of that, the Cards are going to suck.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s a bit  over-the-top to assume that every potential risk you&#8217;re concerned with will become absolute fact. Some will, some won&#8217;t. And there will probably be a few positive surprises as well.</p>
<p>Also - You can&#8217;t go wrong when you point to lack of depth (especially at OT) being a potential Achilles Heel. But this doesn&#8217;t mean this shortcoming will definitely come back to bite us. </p>
<p>For these reasons, I don&#8217;t feel it was a particularly objective article. Suggest you change your brand and type of morning coffee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: perivolaki</title>
		<link>http://www.arizonasportsfans.com/2007/09/breaking-murphys-law/#comment-565</link>
		<author>perivolaki</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 23:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.arizonasportsfans.com/2007/09/breaking-murphys-law/#comment-565</guid>
		<description>Boy, I hardly know where to start. First comparing Mike Gandy to Matt Joyce is not fair at all and tells me you don't intend to be fair in your article. Second, I thought Leckey should be the center but after watching Al Johnson this is a significant upgrade. 

I understand the feelings about Euhus but we don't even really know how Whiz is going to use his tight ends. It wouldn't surprise me to see he kept the three tight ends for a reason and has some surprises up his sleeve for the regular season.

I think you're way off on Watson. I watched some of the Cards games from late last season on the NFL Network and noticed that Watson was being double teamed a lot. You might not think much of him but it was obvious to me that opposing teams were worried about him.

Can you even name one play or game where Hank Milligan really had an affect on the outcome? I think Celestin looked quicker and made more plays on special teams this pre-season than Milligan, hence Milligans gone. To wax nostolgic about his cut is just crazy. 

I can't deny the defense has not looked good this pre-season but again we know they played pretty vanilla and wanted to see how various player stacked up and they did not scheme against any of the opponents. I think it might be wise to wait and see what happens once the real bullets start flying.

Finally I think Grimm has made a big difference and we will have to wait and see how Whiz' playcalling helps us improve on the offensive side of the ball. 

I think it's a little early to make many assumptions and way to early to panic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boy, I hardly know where to start. First comparing Mike Gandy to Matt Joyce is not fair at all and tells me you don&#8217;t intend to be fair in your article. Second, I thought Leckey should be the center but after watching Al Johnson this is a significant upgrade. </p>
<p>I understand the feelings about Euhus but we don&#8217;t even really know how Whiz is going to use his tight ends. It wouldn&#8217;t surprise me to see he kept the three tight ends for a reason and has some surprises up his sleeve for the regular season.</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;re way off on Watson. I watched some of the Cards games from late last season on the NFL Network and noticed that Watson was being double teamed a lot. You might not think much of him but it was obvious to me that opposing teams were worried about him.</p>
<p>Can you even name one play or game where Hank Milligan really had an affect on the outcome? I think Celestin looked quicker and made more plays on special teams this pre-season than Milligan, hence Milligans gone. To wax nostolgic about his cut is just crazy. </p>
<p>I can&#8217;t deny the defense has not looked good this pre-season but again we know they played pretty vanilla and wanted to see how various player stacked up and they did not scheme against any of the opponents. I think it might be wise to wait and see what happens once the real bullets start flying.</p>
<p>Finally I think Grimm has made a big difference and we will have to wait and see how Whiz&#8217; playcalling helps us improve on the offensive side of the ball. </p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s a little early to make many assumptions and way to early to panic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slanidrac16</title>
		<link>http://www.arizonasportsfans.com/2007/09/breaking-murphys-law/#comment-564</link>
		<author>slanidrac16</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 23:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.arizonasportsfans.com/2007/09/breaking-murphys-law/#comment-564</guid>
		<description>I've come to learn that when Harry speaks, I usually listen.  Most of the time he is dead on.
However, as I do every year, I would like to respectfully disagree on a couple of things.
I would like to bring to light that in spite of last year COACHING deficiencies, we were 2 plays a 3 fg's away from being 8-8, just like many teams that are "on the rise". Indeed we are a 5-11 team until proven otherwise but the line between bad, good and great is very thin.
That being said, I disagree about Watson and Branch. It takes time for "kids" to develop. I live in Chicago and believe me when I tell you I heard Many times how Tommie Harris looked like a bust after his rookie year. Thats not me talking. That was the word across the city. Can't say bust about him anymore.
Another thing that is being underestimated is how much better our play calling is going to be.
Our offensive line has been made over. We will NEVER have 5 pro bowl offensive linemen. It is how a unit plays together within the offensive scheme and philosophy. Preseason or not, the line has looked better than we thought it would  at this point. And guess what? This staff decided on our 5 starters BEFORE training camp started. REmember last year when our starting o-line was announced 3 days before the season started....and then changed every week after that for the next 7 weeks.
And finally, The fabulous foresome of Leinart, Edge, Fitz and the Mighty Q will undoubtedly take over a game....and they will only get better! 
As far as the defense.....egads! They scare the hell out of me. I believe we will be a boom or bust defense. We will be forced to gamble and when that happens either plays are blown up, along with turnovers and sacks.....when we guess right. When we don't guess right, I repeat....egads.
I don't know what our record will be , but this team will be more entertaining than any team we've had since 97'. I just hop we can outscore our opponents more than they outscore us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve come to learn that when Harry speaks, I usually listen.  Most of the time he is dead on.<br />
However, as I do every year, I would like to respectfully disagree on a couple of things.<br />
I would like to bring to light that in spite of last year COACHING deficiencies, we were 2 plays a 3 fg&#8217;s away from being 8-8, just like many teams that are &#8220;on the rise&#8221;. Indeed we are a 5-11 team until proven otherwise but the line between bad, good and great is very thin.<br />
That being said, I disagree about Watson and Branch. It takes time for &#8220;kids&#8221; to develop. I live in Chicago and believe me when I tell you I heard Many times how Tommie Harris looked like a bust after his rookie year. Thats not me talking. That was the word across the city. Can&#8217;t say bust about him anymore.<br />
Another thing that is being underestimated is how much better our play calling is going to be.<br />
Our offensive line has been made over. We will NEVER have 5 pro bowl offensive linemen. It is how a unit plays together within the offensive scheme and philosophy. Preseason or not, the line has looked better than we thought it would  at this point. And guess what? This staff decided on our 5 starters BEFORE training camp started. REmember last year when our starting o-line was announced 3 days before the season started&#8230;.and then changed every week after that for the next 7 weeks.<br />
And finally, The fabulous foresome of Leinart, Edge, Fitz and the Mighty Q will undoubtedly take over a game&#8230;.and they will only get better!<br />
As far as the defense&#8230;..egads! They scare the hell out of me. I believe we will be a boom or bust defense. We will be forced to gamble and when that happens either plays are blown up, along with turnovers and sacks&#8230;..when we guess right. When we don&#8217;t guess right, I repeat&#8230;.egads.<br />
I don&#8217;t know what our record will be , but this team will be more entertaining than any team we&#8217;ve had since 97&#8242;. I just hop we can outscore our opponents more than they outscore us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
