Cardinals’ Pre-Camp RB Analysis
July 8, 2007 by Walter Mitchell
The Cardinals open camp with four candidates at halfback in 32-Edgerrin James, 31-Marcel Shipp, 28-J.J. Arrington and 33-Steve Baylark. At fullback there is a crowd of prospects to challenge free agent acquisition 45-Terrelle Smith. Here’s a breakdown of this year’s talent in the backfield.
The incumbent starter at halfback is 32-Edgerrin James (6-0, 220, Miami), a nine year veteran. Last year, James turned in the Cardinals’ first 1,000 yard rushing season since Adrian Murrell’s in 1998. While surpassing 1,000 yards on the ground was a laudable feat, it wasn’t pretty, to say the least. For the first half of the season, the Cardinal running attack was almost completely out of sync, due mostly to an offensive line that lacked the talent and motivation to get a consistent push up front, and due slightly to a newly acquired star running back who wanted no part of pre-season action—-which certainly didn’t help the unit’s timing and cohesion. Once the real games started, the play calling was extraordinarily predictable, and Edgerrin James, the Cards’ prized big name free agent of 2006, looked tentative, overwhelmed and disgruntled.
The epitome of the Cardinals’ running game futility was the Monday Night Football performance versus the Chicago Bears, where the Cardinals elected to try to pound the ball play after play into the teetch of the Bears’ vaunted defense. It was like watching Edgerrin James running in a hamburger drill with no blockers and Brian Urlacher sitting right there between the five yard cones. The constant bludgeoning apparently caused James a leave of his senses, for he inexcusably fumbled the ball with five minutes left while trying to protect what should have been a relatively safe 13 point lead.
When changes were made in the offensive line for the second half of the season, the team’s fortunes running the football suddenly improved. Newly appointed offensive coordinator, Mike Kruczek, spent the bye week trying to convince Edgerrin James to hit the holes faster. James continued to run tentatively, however, often dancing around in search of a crease even when there was a hole. Even more surprising were James’ tentative efforts—on the rare occasions he found himself in the open field—where he would either run like he was treading water or drift right into the hind legs of one of his own blockers.
However, because James was so remarkably durable, physically strong and goal oriented, and because the Cardinals remained committed to the running game, as the offensive line improved, so did James’ numbers.
This year, James will be running for the first time in the NFL with a fullback leading the way. He will be asked to change his modus operandi as a runner…where once his game was tailor made for the Indianapolis zone stretch play (a play that takes time to develop and James could pick his own spots), now James will be asked to run downhill into holes created by quick traps and fullback kick-out and isolation blocks. The question is: Will Edgerrin James adjust nicely to this role?
One player who is likely to shine in this role is 31-Marcel Shipp (5-11, 230, 7th year, UMass). If it’s one thing Marcel Shipp doesn’t do, it’s dance around a hole. He’s a downhill, lower the shoulder on contact type of running back, who spins off contact and tries to eke out every last little inch he can. Shipp is not a homerun threat, but he’s the kind of back who can move the chains and help dictate the tempo of a game.
Another player to keep a close eye on is 3rd year scatback 28-J.J. Arrington (5-9, 214, California). As a change of pace back, Arrington will provide the speed and acceleration that James and Shipp lack. Arrington showed improved toughness at times in 2006, but he still has to demonstrate that he can break a tackle or two and get the extra yard. If Arrington does show that ability, his carries will grow from game to game.
Rookie 33-Steve Baylark (6-0, 225, UMass) is a tough, grind it out runner who is likely to endear the coaches with his courage and determination…enough to, at the very least, land him a spot on the practice squad.
At fullback, the Cardinals signed eight year veteran 45-Terrelle Smith (6-0, 246, Arizona St.) to lead the way for James and company. Smith has a track record of being the lead blocker for 1,000 yard backs in Cleveland, and will be counted on to do the same in Arizona. Smith is tough and precise. The question is: Because of the year in and year out pounding a FB takes in the NFL, has Smith’s best days passed him by?
If Smith falters in any way, the Cardinals stockplied three undrafted rookie free agent fullbacks in 46-Tim Castille (5-11, 234, Alabama), 34-Brandon Snow (6-0, 242, Penn. St.) and 36-Rashon Vercher (5-11, 245, Fresno St.). Of the three, Castille is the most versatile, as he was a touchdown machine near the goal line at Alabama as an inside runner, lead blocker and pass receiver. Snow and Vercher are proto-typical smashmouth fullbacks who consistently paved the way for 1,000 yard rushers at top flight programs.
In addition to Terrelle Smith and the three rookies, the Cardinals also have two other possible candidates at fullback in 44-A.J. Schable (6-3, 281, 2nd year, South Dakota) and 85-John Bronson (6-3, 275, 3rd year, Penn St.). Schable earned some time as a short yardage blocking fullback last year and did fairly well. Bronson was tried at fullback in the pre-season last year. He was an imposing force in his first game, missed some blocks in his second and was rarely seen in the role again. Both Schable and Bronson are two of the more phsycial and productive special teams players on the Cardinals’ roster. Because Schable tackles so well, it may make sense for the Cardinals to try him at inside linebacker, particularly now that the Cards are utilizing the 3-4. And, in Bronson’s case, the team desperately needs a blocking tight end, and if he can fit that bill the way Fred Wakefield did last year, then the odds of him making the roster are improved.
Grade: B. The Cardinals won’t be flashy, save some timely bursts from Arrington, but there’s a fair degree of toughness at both halfback and fullback, which certainly will satisfy Whiz’s smashmouth philosophy. The one question that may haunt the Cardinals for years to come…should they have drafted Adrian Peterson when they had the opportunity to?
Posted in
subscribe to our full feed!
content rss

2-3 years down the arizona media and people on this board will wonder why Peterson is playing in Minnesota instead of the desert. In my opinion backs like him come along 4-5 times in a lifetime. Did he have injury concerns? Yes, but that is what your team doctors are for. Will Levi Brown be a good NFL player? Probably, but will he be special? Only time will tell. If Brown helps the Cards turn the corner and they make the playoffs in a few seasons, win a Super Bowl and have continous trips to the playoffs, Peterson will be forgotten. If we fail and Peterson is the back I think he is get ready for the backlash on this board and the constant criticism that has plagued this team since the days of Nixon. By the way, I think Baylark has some serious potential, I saw him play a few games last season. The kid is a bell cow, he can carry the rock!!!
fair take on the RB situation, and Whis has praised Tim Castille for his effort in all the mini-camps, so he may be challenging for some definite playing time.
The one swing and miss that you mentioned is about a 1,000 yard effort being a “laudible feat”.
In this age of 1500-1800 yards backs in the “elite” echelon, 1159 yards behind even a crappy o-line is below average.
1,000 yards isnt what it used to be. An average of 72.44 YPG (1,159 yards) is certainly nothing to get excited about.
I do agree about Shipp, and he is much more of a Najeh Davenport/Verron Haynes/Duce Staley than anybody else on the team.
This is Shipp’s year, if he is ever going to have one. I would say he is finally 100% coming back from that brutal broken ankle / leg.
Your point about his style and the smash-mouth running game is the key for Shipp.
I fully expect Edge to be benched by mid-season, if not sooner.
Many worry about our offensive line but I believe RB is the weakest offensive position on this team.
Shipp will help a lot if Arrington can contribute enough to spell him regularly. A few years ago, when Shipp carried the ball a lot, he quickly wore down.
I would not have drafted Peterson, he’s too much of an injury risk and has been over-used by Stoops.
Baylark intrigues me. Hope Buckbird’s comments about him prove correct.
Nice article, Mitch, and good to see comments by people who don’t normally comment.
Camp is fast approaching. Interest is picking up. I’m ready!
It’s absolutely unbelievable that people here think that a guy who last averaged above 4.0 YPC in 2002 and averaged 2.4 YPC last season can be a back that leads this team anywhere.
I’m always amazed by the certitude with which we make our points about players and roster spots.
Was it the O-Line or Edge? Dunno. Probably the O-line.
Will Edge get used to running behind a FB? Dunno. Probably.
Do Shipp’s recent lackluster season stats prove he can’t get the job done? Dunno. The reason for the lackluster stats is that he’s been either injured or been asked to play a specific (short yardage) role of late. Before that, there were games awhile back during which a healthy Shipp ran with authority and pretty good speed.
Will Arrington continue to struggle? Or will he bloom under new coaching? Dunno. I do think he has the physical talent to be special if he can put it all together.
Will any UDFA’s flash anything? Dunno. Baylark appears to be well grounded in all aspects of playing RB (including catching and blitz pickup) and is an instinctive runner (though nothing really special; kind of a LeRoy Hoard type runner). With guys like that, there’s a threshhold above which you can get lucky and wind up with a Marcus Allen, but most of the time, you get a journeyman type player who fades away after a couple of years.
What about the O-line? Dunno. Lots of new faces at new positions; and therefore, lots of question-marks. (Lutui – in just his second year – is the only starting lineman lining up in the same spot).
Just as, in my opinion, we should think in terms of a many-tentacled “Passing Monster”, we should think in terms of a many-faceted “Running Monster” which consists of our RB’s (& their speed, moves, vision, explosion, toughness etc.), the O-line (& it’s toughness, explosion, mobility, smarts etc.) and the timing established between our RB’s and our O-line – including the TE.
It’s premature to pass judgment on our RB’s and O-line until we see them in action after July 27.
Edge running behind a FB just isnt an issue. He did it in college and he has already said it doesnt mind it now. Its a made up media story when we first signed him. He doesnt care if its a FB or even a punter running in front of him as long as they are opening up holes.
Shipp is not or will ever be a full time RB as evidence of him wearing down really fast in the season pre-injury. The only person that will take Edge spot of 18 or more carries a game is JJ. But Shipp will serve his role as a good change of pace.
As for JJ in OTA’s it seems like Wiz has a plan for him after all. JJ was the only back being used in the 2 minute drills, and was the most used RB in 3rd down situations.
Edge will get his 300 carries, Shipp will get his fair share, and JJ will have more receptions then both of them combined. Thats my prediction, all 3 will be used.
Edge has plenty of steam left. The lack of production last year was the fault of a poor OL. Edge fought for every yard. It is hard to be successful as a RB when a Defensive Lineman is meeting you at the QB. The success of this team rides on the OL. Shipp’s style of play leads to injuries. However, he is great for short yardage plays. JJ can be a good RB. However, he needs a good OL that will open holes and allow him to use his speed to out run the LB and DB. We have not seen an OL of that quality in 15 years, maybe longer.
gay leather toys