<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cardinals&#8217; Pre-Camp QB Analysis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.arizonasportsfans.com/2007/07/cardinals-pre-camp-qb-analysis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.arizonasportsfans.com/2007/07/cardinals-pre-camp-qb-analysis/</link>
	<description>The number one Arizona Sports fan site on the planet</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 02:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Gollin</title>
		<link>http://www.arizonasportsfans.com/2007/07/cardinals-pre-camp-qb-analysis/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Gollin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 15:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arizonasportsfans.com/2007/07/cardinals-pre-camp-qb-analysis/#comment-86</guid>
		<description>	&lt;p&gt;Walter and Jim &#8211; Nice points, counter-points and counter-counter points.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;One mistake I think we&#8217;re all prone to make is failing to consider the performance of a player at any position within the context of surrounding cast.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;When they get blocking, both Warner and Leinart will appear to &#8220;gain poise&#8221; and &#8220;make better decisions.&#8221; &lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;When both Fitz and Q are at the top of their games, both QB&#8217;s suddenly are &#8220;more adept at hitting the open man&#8221; (because &#8211; duh! &#8211; a man is open).&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;When the running attack is more dangerous, suddenly KW and ML seem &#8220;more mobile&#8221; (because fewer defenders are blowing in on them with reckless abandon).&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Therefore, rather than evaluating our QB&#8217;s in isolation, we might be better off thinking in terms of a many-tentacled Cardinal &#8220;passing monster&#8221; that has a throwing mechanism, several passing mechanisms and a complex protection mechanism.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;We should be asking ourselves: how effective is the Cardinal passing monster and why?&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Walter and Jim &#8211; Nice points, counter-points and counter-counter points.</p>
<p>One mistake I think we&#8217;re all prone to make is failing to consider the performance of a player at any position within the context of surrounding cast.</p>
<p>When they get blocking, both Warner and Leinart will appear to &#8220;gain poise&#8221; and &#8220;make better decisions.&#8221; </p>
<p>When both Fitz and Q are at the top of their games, both QB&#8217;s suddenly are &#8220;more adept at hitting the open man&#8221; (because &#8211; duh! &#8211; a man is open).</p>
<p>When the running attack is more dangerous, suddenly KW and ML seem &#8220;more mobile&#8221; (because fewer defenders are blowing in on them with reckless abandon).</p>
<p>Therefore, rather than evaluating our QB&#8217;s in isolation, we might be better off thinking in terms of a many-tentacled Cardinal &#8220;passing monster&#8221; that has a throwing mechanism, several passing mechanisms and a complex protection mechanism.</p>
<p>We should be asking ourselves: how effective is the Cardinal passing monster and why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walter Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://www.arizonasportsfans.com/2007/07/cardinals-pre-camp-qb-analysis/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>Walter Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 12:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arizonasportsfans.com/2007/07/cardinals-pre-camp-qb-analysis/#comment-85</guid>
		<description>	&lt;p&gt;I hope you are right about Warner, Garth. The fact is that in two seasons he&#8217;s gone 3-12 as the starter, while Josh McCown went 3-3 and rookie Matt Leinart went 4-7 (which would have been 6-5 had Neil Rackers not missed two game winning field goals). During Warner&#8217;s tenure he has proven to be more likely to fumble with the game on the line than throw a winning TD. His red zone woes have been significant. Perhaps with Whiz mentoring him, Warner will rise to the occasion this time. Regardless, one really has to question his $4M+ price tag.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope you are right about Warner, Garth. The fact is that in two seasons he&#8217;s gone 3-12 as the starter, while Josh McCown went 3-3 and rookie Matt Leinart went 4-7 (which would have been 6-5 had Neil Rackers not missed two game winning field goals). During Warner&#8217;s tenure he has proven to be more likely to fumble with the game on the line than throw a winning TD. His red zone woes have been significant. Perhaps with Whiz mentoring him, Warner will rise to the occasion this time. Regardless, one really has to question his $4M+ price tag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garthshort</title>
		<link>http://www.arizonasportsfans.com/2007/07/cardinals-pre-camp-qb-analysis/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Garthshort</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 11:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arizonasportsfans.com/2007/07/cardinals-pre-camp-qb-analysis/#comment-84</guid>
		<description>	&lt;p&gt;Walter, thank you. Ratings (B+) don&#8217;t mean much to me, but the verbiage that goes along with it, does. I think you&#8217;re being too hard on KW. For a few games, &lt;span class="caps"&gt;IMO&lt;/span&gt;, he could be a very effective backup, &lt;span class="caps"&gt;PROVIDED&lt;/span&gt; he has a good running game to work with. And the intangibles that he brings to the job enhances his value. I would think that upon retirement as a player that he would be scooped up as a coach by some team, college or pro. And didn&#8217;t gloves make a big difference in his play, last year?&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Walter, thank you. Ratings (B+) don&#8217;t mean much to me, but the verbiage that goes along with it, does. I think you&#8217;re being too hard on KW. For a few games, <span class="caps">IMO</span>, he could be a very effective backup, <span class="caps">PROVIDED</span> he has a good running game to work with. And the intangibles that he brings to the job enhances his value. I would think that upon retirement as a player that he would be scooped up as a coach by some team, college or pro. And didn&#8217;t gloves make a big difference in his play, last year?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walter Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://www.arizonasportsfans.com/2007/07/cardinals-pre-camp-qb-analysis/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Walter Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 02:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arizonasportsfans.com/2007/07/cardinals-pre-camp-qb-analysis/#comment-83</guid>
		<description>	&lt;p&gt;Agreed, David. I will be posting an o-line article similar to this one soon. I&#8217;ll be interested in your thoughts. I actually think if there was some way to trade for G Alan Faneca, I think he would galvanize this entire line and the Cards would be headed to the playoffs for the first time since 1998. Without Faneca, I am not sure if the Cardinals win seven games. Can one player make a huge difference? You bet. How about losing Pete Kendall in year one of Denny Ball&#8230;had the Cardinals won two more games, they would have won the &lt;span class="caps"&gt;NFC&lt;/span&gt; West&#8230;and the two games they could have easily won&#8212;if they could have run out the clock on the ground in both cases&#8212; were the two losses to the 49ers&#8230;the only two wins of their  2-14 season. Go figure.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed, David. I will be posting an o-line article similar to this one soon. I&#8217;ll be interested in your thoughts. I actually think if there was some way to trade for G Alan Faneca, I think he would galvanize this entire line and the Cards would be headed to the playoffs for the first time since 1998. Without Faneca, I am not sure if the Cardinals win seven games. Can one player make a huge difference? You bet. How about losing Pete Kendall in year one of Denny Ball&#8230;had the Cardinals won two more games, they would have won the <span class="caps">NFC</span> West&#8230;and the two games they could have easily won&#8212;if they could have run out the clock on the ground in both cases&#8212; were the two losses to the 49ers&#8230;the only two wins of their  2-14 season. Go figure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.arizonasportsfans.com/2007/07/cardinals-pre-camp-qb-analysis/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 23:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arizonasportsfans.com/2007/07/cardinals-pre-camp-qb-analysis/#comment-82</guid>
		<description>	&lt;p&gt;Mitch,&lt;br /&gt;
The biggest problem our QBs have is the OL. Every position on the OL has a question mark next to it. Its hard to be successful as a QB without at least a decent OL.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mitch,<br />
The biggest problem our QBs have is the OL. Every position on the OL has a question mark next to it. Its hard to be successful as a QB without at least a decent OL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walter Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://www.arizonasportsfans.com/2007/07/cardinals-pre-camp-qb-analysis/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>Walter Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 18:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arizonasportsfans.com/2007/07/cardinals-pre-camp-qb-analysis/#comment-79</guid>
		<description>	&lt;p&gt;I concur with everything you just wrote, Jim, although I still have vestiges of hope for Shane Boyd. I really liked the way he played against the Cardinals in pre-season last year. I thought he got some bad breaks in that game&#8212;-dropped passes at key times and one pass deflected for an interception&#8212;-but I really liked his arm strength and especially liked the way he bolted out of the pocket when he needed to. But, I would agree that unless he lights it up for the Cards this pre-season he may be true NFL&#8212;&#8220;not for long.&#8221; &lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I concur with everything you just wrote, Jim, although I still have vestiges of hope for Shane Boyd. I really liked the way he played against the Cardinals in pre-season last year. I thought he got some bad breaks in that game&#8212;-dropped passes at key times and one pass deflected for an interception&#8212;-but I really liked his arm strength and especially liked the way he bolted out of the pocket when he needed to. But, I would agree that unless he lights it up for the Cards this pre-season he may be true NFL&#8212;&#8220;not for long.&#8221; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Skane</title>
		<link>http://www.arizonasportsfans.com/2007/07/cardinals-pre-camp-qb-analysis/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Skane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 18:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arizonasportsfans.com/2007/07/cardinals-pre-camp-qb-analysis/#comment-78</guid>
		<description>	&lt;p&gt;Walter, I think you are being generous with your pre-camp rating of B+.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;I want to see evidence of Leinart&#8217;s supposed full recovery from his shoulder injuries before I start getting excited.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;However, I agree with you on Brian St. Pierre.  Always liked him.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;My guess is Boyd is toast but Korrodi stays (I hope)&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Overall, nice take.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;I think we live or die, this year and next, on Leinart&#8217;s health.  He is the best QB talent, by far, on this roster.  If anybody else has to play, we are dead meat and will have to draft another QB next year.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Walter, I think you are being generous with your pre-camp rating of B+.</p>
<p>I want to see evidence of Leinart&#8217;s supposed full recovery from his shoulder injuries before I start getting excited.</p>
<p>However, I agree with you on Brian St. Pierre.  Always liked him.</p>
<p>My guess is Boyd is toast but Korrodi stays (I hope)</p>
<p>Overall, nice take.</p>
<p>I think we live or die, this year and next, on Leinart&#8217;s health.  He is the best QB talent, by far, on this roster.  If anybody else has to play, we are dead meat and will have to draft another QB next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
